Page 32 of 84

Posted: Thu Sep 30, 2021 6:55 am
by Bingle
In post 771, Something_Smart wrote:
In post 768, Bingle wrote:Given context, have you come to conclusions?
Not really? It seems like he's mostly just missed/ignored questions, not dodged them.
He’s missed/ignored EVERY question. To the extent that it’s harder to find examples of duck answering a question than skipping it.

And it’s definitely intentional: one of the questions I quoted was him quoting a question he ignored. He later ignored questions about that post. And I spent a literal day phase calling him out on this which resulted in him OMGUS-ing me but voting Wisdom.

If there’s anything Moore obviously described as dodging I haven’t seen it. Duck has been open wolfing.

Posted: Thu Sep 30, 2021 7:10 am
by Bingle
Once is accident. Twice is coincidence. Three times is enemy action.

25 pages worth is just the worst.

Posted: Thu Sep 30, 2021 7:45 am
by Something_Smart
In post 772, Morning Tweet wrote:Confusing and irritating as in I was intentionally ignoring Wisdom in order to elim him easier or whatever reason, or simply confusing and irritating with no further conclusion
The latter.

Posted: Thu Sep 30, 2021 7:59 am
by Morning Tweet
Ok let's recap

well we now know that I didn't think to ask Wisdom to elaborate on his worst read yesterday, but today I'm interested in it

Is it because I was too busy thinking Wisdom was scum yesterday and more or less didn't think about worst, but now I'm thinking about worst today... or..

is it because I didn't actually care to sort Wisdom or worst and today I'm trying to judge how easily I can miselim worst, or am asking useless questions, or whatever scum oriented motivation you can imagine

If I had to read myself, I think it's probably NAI since I legitimately didn't really engage with worst at all yesterday or mention him at all. As town I was just not thinking about duck and tunneled on Wisdom, but as scum I could have done the same thing not thinking about duck

Should I have been more methodical, probably, maybe things would have been different. Is it confusing, not really, I think it's fairly cut and dry

Posted: Thu Sep 30, 2021 8:26 am
by Something_Smart
Sure I mean I'm not that confused by it anymore, it seems like you just decided you'd read Wisdom and didn't care to keep thinking about it, which I guess is a thing that can happen. But I'm still irritated.

Posted: Thu Sep 30, 2021 8:44 am
by Morning Tweet
So do you think further scrutinizing of worstie today is warranted?

Posted: Thu Sep 30, 2021 8:49 am
by Something_Smart
Yeah, I mean, he should answer the questions that were posed to him.

Posted: Thu Sep 30, 2021 10:03 am
by Bingle
Spoiler: Every post ducks has answered a question in
In post 243, the worst wrote:
In post 209, Taly wrote:
In post 186, the worst wrote:
In post 183, Taly wrote:
In post 179, Bingle wrote:
In post 177, the worst wrote:
In post 146, Bingle wrote:
In post 144, Wisdom wrote:
In post 127, Taly wrote:The reason I point this out is because I read the bolded as though you knew I was 8ball. A potential slip. That's what I want clarified.
No, you misread. Imaginality was talking about the possibility of you being scum and 8ball, and that's what I was responding to
Just gonna cut this off at the knees: That was 100% not a scum slip. When discussing the hypothetical that you are the eightball, the presumption that you would flip 8 ball is natural.

Hopefully we don't have a week long argument about whether the obviously NAI post is a scumslip every game I'm scum in.
now
this
is a scumslip
Image
But like, it reads like a potential slip to me too. Djdoxjsklsjshs
i'd be interested in you expanding, i've had growing concerns about bingle.
Just the
"every game I'm scum in"
sounds like an admission since it seemed
Bingle
presumed that the
Wisdom
post was a red herring. Why would the first part of that sentence be true but the next be false?

Like, I can't be misreading again can I?

And why hold off on those concerns ducky, you waiting for me to be your shield? :P
i'm wondering why you're making up opinions. lol.
In post 321, the worst wrote:because i want someone else to do it first so i can sheep them and pretend it was my idea all along
In post 506, the worst wrote:
In post 504, House wrote:
In post 502, the worst wrote:Mom's talymaginality solve is towny
Didn't seem so on a skim.

I'll review it later.
In the spur of the moment I didn't believe in it but could totally see why someone would
In post 627, the worst wrote:
In post 623, Bingle wrote:
In post 588, the worst wrote:
In post 562, Taly wrote:But I also wonder why Bingle feels compelled to defend Wisdom.
i feel like bingle is
- missing a vibe read
- working on a consistent trajectory

he feels forced
Lol. Pull the other one. When have I ever been a tonal read? Better, what fucking trajectory? I’ve been treading water the entire game trying to get reads and the whole reason I cottoned on to you is because you have been actively working against that.
this isn't a tonal read lol


1. Duck engaging over Taly taking him misquoting me on purpose seriously.
2. Duck answering an obvious question he set bait out for.
3. Duck incidentally answering Taly’s question while talking to house.
4. Duck answering exactly half of the questions posed to him in a post. He later feigned not knowing he’d ignored me asking what scum trajectory I was supposed to have.

Posted: Thu Sep 30, 2021 10:27 am
by Morning Tweet
It's probably worth noting worst has had the opportunity to engage with Bingle a bunch and recently -- it just that it was about bread, trips to Australia, and the golden state bridge

wellll time to wait for now i guess

Image

Posted: Thu Sep 30, 2021 11:53 am
by Bingle
It's not just me. He was also notably absent when Taly attempted to engage with him, and he had a townread on Taly, so it's not explained by "Oh, I think Bingle's scum so I shouldn't bother engaging with him about the game."

Posted: Thu Sep 30, 2021 11:56 am
by the worst
i don't really need to engage with scum lol
VOTE: bingle

Posted: Thu Sep 30, 2021 12:04 pm
by the worst
i'd contest that bingle is like, very clearly driving an agenda-driven lim. i had a busy week and spent my time finding scum, rather than answering questions which didn't interest me much. not sorry.

Posted: Thu Sep 30, 2021 12:24 pm
by Morning Tweet
So you figure you've got the 8-ball worst?

Posted: Thu Sep 30, 2021 12:42 pm
by the worst
all i'm gonna say is when u elim me and scum get another kill, remember.

Posted: Thu Sep 30, 2021 12:42 pm
by the worst
wait. that would be endgame.

yes. i strongly suspect i am the 8-ball.

Posted: Thu Sep 30, 2021 12:44 pm
by Something_Smart
:X

Posted: Thu Sep 30, 2021 12:45 pm
by the worst
:(

Posted: Thu Sep 30, 2021 12:45 pm
by Something_Smart
Definitely you are the 8-ball and not the counterwagon to town who also lolhammered the 8-ball.

Posted: Thu Sep 30, 2021 12:46 pm
by the worst
actually realistically regardless of bingle's alignment, the 8-ball is probably one of bingle or myself (whichever one scum thinks is more likely to lose a 1v1 which admittedly might just be bingle)

pedit: concede that

Posted: Thu Sep 30, 2021 12:47 pm
by Something_Smart
Yeah, that's kinda my point. You shouldn't be voting him.

Posted: Thu Sep 30, 2021 12:51 pm
by the worst
i remember ending the day thinking and mom and taly were kinda towny
i think i liked imaginality?
probably going to start by looking for 2 in MT, House, Bingle.

VOTE: House as a starting point.

Posted: Thu Sep 30, 2021 12:54 pm
by the worst
honestly still just think bingle is scum and i'd rather a scum flip and staying in stressful ELo than elim someone kinda meh
i'll do some more reading when i'm not at work

Posted: Thu Sep 30, 2021 12:55 pm
by Morning Tweet
I agree Bingle is the 8-ball

I was curious why you feel his push on you is transparently agenda-driven and if the 8-ball played into that

Posted: Thu Sep 30, 2021 12:58 pm
by Morning Tweet
Hot take I think both scum are on this page

Posted: Thu Sep 30, 2021 1:01 pm
by Morning Tweet
Am i going to substantiate that

Maybe