Posted: Wed Nov 10, 2021 12:05 pm
Unvote
My vote's still symbolically on Val; consider his selfvote to be my vote. I don't want igor to hammer just yet though.
Page 32 of 52
My vote's still symbolically on Val; consider his selfvote to be my vote. I don't want igor to hammer just yet though.
Posted: Wed Nov 10, 2021 12:07 pm
Well, if that's a thing, my vote is still 'symbolically' on catboi.
Posted: Wed Nov 10, 2021 12:19 pm
But unsymbolically it is on yourself.In post 776, Val89 wrote:Well, if that's a thing, my vote is still 'symbolically' on catboi.
Implosion clearly withdrew because they’re alarmed by whatever you’re doing.
What point are you trying to make?
Posted: Wed Nov 10, 2021 12:24 pm
Igor, I know you are town. Vote me, please.
Posted: Wed Nov 10, 2021 12:28 pm
Posted: Wed Nov 10, 2021 2:03 pm
Shrug, that feels like a bluff from Val although I'm super biased
Posted: Wed Nov 10, 2021 2:06 pm
Someone might try to compare that to my read on Greeting but I think context is king
Posted: Wed Nov 10, 2021 2:11 pm
Prior to the recent activity I had planned on trying to analyze the interactions between frogsfrogs and val to see if they were compatible, because I want to put out everything I can into the thread and see if team makes sense, I think there's stuff there
I know I was warning against pre-flip associatives because it made me do dumb things on day 1 but I have strong scumreads on both of them due to individually scummy behavior and POE, this would be a last step of "does this solve make sense?"
I know I was warning against pre-flip associatives because it made me do dumb things on day 1 but I have strong scumreads on both of them due to individually scummy behavior and POE, this would be a last step of "does this solve make sense?"
Posted: Wed Nov 10, 2021 2:14 pm
Yeah, okay, this post is super off and I'll explain why:In post 768, Val89 wrote:VOTE: Val89
Which one of you scumbags are going to hammer me then, eh, or are both of you already on this wagon?
Val churns out these massive walls on the regular in his posting, trying to gin up arguments with everyone, even when someone is trying to break it off and makes it clear they don't see a point in arguing with him
Then, suddenly, when the tide turns against him, he just immediately says nothing else, no arguing with his supposed townread, no attempts to leave behind a legacy?
it's not a believable display at all
Posted: Wed Nov 10, 2021 2:17 pm
The whole purpose there is just intimidation to try to scare people off
Posted: Wed Nov 10, 2021 2:19 pm
he was super-confident in having the solve of me/greeting earlier but suddenly he's talking about "flushing out the partner"
he wants to scare people into not voting him by making them afraid they'll get scumread for doing so
he wants to scare people into not voting him by making them afraid they'll get scumread for doing so
Posted: Wed Nov 10, 2021 2:22 pm
You + Greeting or MafMen.
Get it right.
Get it right.
Posted: Wed Nov 10, 2021 2:43 pm
mmmmkay
Posted: Wed Nov 10, 2021 11:57 pm
@frogsfrogs if you are town, vote for val
VOTE: frogsfrogs
VOTE: frogsfrogs
Posted: Thu Nov 11, 2021 1:41 am
In post 784, catboi wrote:The whole purpose there is just intimidation to try to scare people off
It seems that my post 777 is not worthy of an answer by Val89. Therefore, you are right, this is an intimidation tactic.In post 785, catboi wrote:he was super-confident in having the solve of me/greeting earlier but suddenly he's talking about "flushing out the partner"
he wants to scare people into not voting him by making them afraid they'll get scumread for doing so
Vote Val89, y’all.
Posted: Thu Nov 11, 2021 3:36 am
Why is that what you gravitate to instead of asking the question again?In post 789, Greeting wrote:In post 784, catboi wrote:The whole purpose there is just intimidation to try to scare people offIt seems that my post 777 is not worthy of an answer by Val89. Therefore, you are right, this is an intimidation tactic.In post 785, catboi wrote:he was super-confident in having the solve of me/greeting earlier but suddenly he's talking about "flushing out the partner"
he wants to scare people into not voting him by making them afraid they'll get scumread for doing so
Vote Val89, y’all.
Posted: Thu Nov 11, 2021 3:40 am
I’ve already asked it twice, in 773 and 777. Without any doubt, he’s seen it. I’m not going to nag him as lack of an answer to a question that he couldn’t have missed is also an answer.In post 790, StrangeMatter wrote:Why is that what you gravitate to instead of asking the question again?In post 789, Greeting wrote:In post 784, catboi wrote:The whole purpose there is just intimidation to try to scare people offIt seems that my post 777 is not worthy of an answer by Val89. Therefore, you are right, this is an intimidation tactic.In post 785, catboi wrote:he was super-confident in having the solve of me/greeting earlier but suddenly he's talking about "flushing out the partner"
he wants to scare people into not voting him by making them afraid they'll get scumread for doing so
Vote Val89, y’all.
Posted: Thu Nov 11, 2021 3:44 am
While we're here, can you give a case as to why you think Val89 is scum here?
Posted: Thu Nov 11, 2021 3:52 am
Who, specifically, are you alledging I am trying to 'intimidate', here?
Posted: Thu Nov 11, 2021 3:57 am
At the moment, no. But I will compile a post when I get back home today evening.In post 792, StrangeMatter wrote:While we're here, can you give a case as to why you think Val89 is scum here?
Posted: Thu Nov 11, 2021 4:00 am
Could you answer my question? A couple of names shouldn't be too hard to whack out, should it. There is a very limited pool of them.
Posted: Thu Nov 11, 2021 6:11 am
Oh my god what,
no.
I'm seeing Val doing this as a way to force opinions of greeting (see who thinks this self vote is still scummy vs thinking greeting self hammer threat town & why) and see if there's a hammer after his two scum reads are already voting him. He's town. He doesn't do this right now, making himself
actually
in danger of a lim, unlike greeting, if he's about to flip red and I think this kind of extreme play is in line with who he's been so far!!VOTE: Greeting
It's two of greeting / catboi / mafmen, and this train makes it look a lot like the first two :I
Posted: Thu Nov 11, 2021 6:13 am
This is townie by implosionIn post 775, implosion wrote:Unvote
My vote's still symbolically on Val; consider his selfvote to be my vote. I don't want igor to hammer just yet though.
Posted: Thu Nov 11, 2021 6:57 am
Sure! If you answer mine first.In post 795, Val89 wrote:Could you answer my question? A couple of names shouldn't be too hard to whack out, should it. There is a very limited pool of them.
Posted: Thu Nov 11, 2021 6:58 am
I do how you're writing this as an explanationIn post 796, frogsfrogs wrote:I'm seeing Val doing this as a way to force opinions of greeting (see who thinks this self vote is still scummy vs thinking greeting self hammer threat town & why) and see if there's a hammer after his two scum reads are already voting him. He's town. He doesn't do this right now, making himself actually in danger of a lim, unlike greeting, if he's about to flip red and I think this kind of extreme play is in line with who he's been so far!!
VOTE: Greeting
It's two of greeting / catboi / mafmen, and this train makes it look a lot like the first two :I
for
Val, like you're his lawyer or something.