Mafiascum.net

Reconciliation can be a more subtle type of defense basically rather than the overt “why”, dunno... Reading back I guess I would have expected a different kind of engagement on the points.

In post 769, skitter30 wrote:Oh fun, ok i have a lot to say on that, but give me a few hours

this rxn makes me think ur wrong Datisi regardless of her alignment

which makes me think weakly town

VOTE: SirCakez

Getting the same feelings as I did in Final Fantasy.

Anyone know if there's a user-made extension to convert entire threads to PDF?

I'm swamped with end-of-year stuff at work but am hoping to read on my flight later. I'm not eager to download each page individually, but if I have to I will.

In post 774, Mare wrote:you admitted to wanting to shut down someone saying “oh you agree you’re scum”.

yes? to me the "oh, so you agree you're scum?" is a kindergarden-level gotcha that i would've guessed someone like iv would love to say because he thinks he's funny and i wanted to not waste time there.

why should i ~care~ about things nsg said about me? like, i know she's wrong on my alignment, i'm not gonna be wasting time trying to convince her she's wrong there because i do think i'll be able to show it as the game goes on, but i *will* use the opportunity to try to read her.

@iv, if i'm wrong, i'll figure it out. i wanna see her response.

In post 779, Faker wrote:Anyone know if there's a user-made extension to convert entire threads to PDF?

I'm swamped with end-of-year stuff at work but am hoping to read on my flight later. I'm not eager to download each page individually, but if I have to I will.

you can add "&ppp=200" to make each page have 200 posts instead of 25, though i know that's not exactly the solution you asked for.

In post 780, Datisi wrote:

In post 774, Mare wrote:you admitted to wanting to shut down someone saying “oh you agree you’re scum”.

yes? to me the "oh, so you agree you're scum?" is a kindergarden-level gotcha that i would've guessed someone like iv would love to say because he thinks he's funny and i wanted to not waste time there.

why should i ~care~ about things nsg said about me? like, i know she's wrong on my alignment, i'm not gonna be wasting time trying to convince her she's wrong there because i do think i'll be able to show it as the game goes on, but i *will* use the opportunity to try to read her.

@iv, if i'm wrong, i'll figure it out. i wanna see her response.

I guess the vulnerability in that is not wanting to deal with it at all and stomping it out, I guess I get it though.

And if you wanted to read her... it felt like a relatively neutral springboard to use? Despite the scumread on you she was mild and I think it could’ve been good discussion to figure out where she was coming from and thus motivation and thus alignment, etc.

Definitely helps make the task more feasible, thanks Datisi

Mare, glad you realized it was "springboard"

Is that not the right use of the word. ._.

No, that is the correct phrase and usage, I was just commenting that before you used a different phrase instead that made your alts easily identifiable.

In post 782, Mare wrote:And if you wanted to read her... it felt like a relatively neutral springboard to use? Despite the scumread on you she was mild and I think it could’ve been good discussion to figure out where she was coming from and thus motivation and thus alignment, etc.

i didn't specifically set out to have a read on nsg, i just saw something that made sense to me from town!nsg's point of view, and considering it's relatively early and i'm currently prioritizing quantity over quality, it felt fine. also it was like 1am.

do you find me scummy for it? is this conversation helping you read me?

In post 785, Faker wrote:No, that is the correct phrase and usage, I was just commenting that before you used a different phrase instead that made your alts easily identifiable.

The joke is all of my alts are easily identifiable. And I... actually have no idea what else I would have said.

In post 786, Datisi wrote:

In post 782, Mare wrote:And if you wanted to read her... it felt like a relatively neutral springboard to use? Despite the scumread on you she was mild and I think it could’ve been good discussion to figure out where she was coming from and thus motivation and thus alignment, etc.

i didn't specifically set out to have a read on nsg, i just saw something that made sense to me from town!nsg's point of view, and considering it's relatively early and i'm currently prioritizing quantity over quality, it felt fine. also it was like 1am.

do you find me scummy for it? is this conversation helping you read me?

Huh. To me, if someone comes out of the gate thinking I’m scum on entrance I think I’d personally want to know why like... immediately. And then discern from there.

I think it’s a little strange. Not the most but a little, but yes this conversation is helping me more than just reading everyone else’s conversation.

You used to say "jumping board", which is how I nailed Vulture.

LOOK.

When I was growing up I lived in a super rural place and we didn’t have a pool but there was a lake and the neighbor kids made a diving board out of some loose planks. One of them jumped onto a catfish and had to be hospitalized.

And clearly this was not a DIVING BOARD that we called it but a jumping one.

In post 787, Mare wrote:Huh. To me, if someone comes out of the gate thinking I’m scum on entrance I think I’d personally want to know why like... immediately. And then discern from there.

if i had thought the scumread is uncalled for, i'd have called her out and demanded explanation.

what is this conversation telling you?

In post 791, Datisi wrote:

In post 787, Mare wrote:Huh. To me, if someone comes out of the gate thinking I’m scum on entrance I think I’d personally want to know why like... immediately. And then discern from there.

if i had thought the scumread is uncalled for, i'd have called her out and demanded explanation.

what is this conversation telling you?

That I think your way of thinking is different to mine, I find it strange, and that I’m going to read closer into you as the game goes but for right now it’s *enough*.

In post 752, skitter30 wrote:really Bad Vote (and so was catboi's tbh)

I disagree fwiw, it's not a Good Vote but I have been uncharacteristically quiet for someone who normally loves fast-paced games.

so, like... you gonna offer some Fresh Takes, or...?

idk maybe

I probably owe the game a full reread because I read it all but was only half-focused for a lot of it.

Though I do feel like rereading rapidly posted sections is harder in general, which is, like, the whole game.

In post 121, Andante wrote:mmmm nah not yet, just gonna let time go by and see if I tr/sr you

wat

ummm I'm running into a major thing in my reads here... Datisi/Innocentvillager, do yall always interact like this when yall play together? like, I guess I'm asking like, do you 2 have a lot of history? cause there's this thing I'm noticing, and I think Innocentvillager is either scum trying to pocket datisi, or this is just how you 2 play in games together..
So if Datisi/innocentvillager could help me out here, I'd appreciate it, cause yeah, I start to question my reads when I start having a million scum points for people

In post 797, Something_Smart wrote:

In post 121, Andante wrote:mmmm nah not yet, just gonna let time go by and see if I tr/sr you

wat

wat?