In post 769, Irrelephant11 wrote:...............................................................................................can'ttellifthat'sajoke
I think I'm in a much more serious playerlist than I thought I was, overall, actually. Like that one time I was really funny and fire got so mad because I didn't immediately answer his question. also now
am I the only one having fun??
i wasn't mad, you not answering just didn't really do anything to make me think you were town
In post 771, Irrelephant11 wrote:anyway this is interesting. Honestly like 50-70% of my townread on datisi was that you and skitter both townread him (if one/two of you is town you're hopefully right, if you're both scummy mafs, well then by pure maths he's still town). I don't really wanntttt to reconsider my townread on datisi but good to know that I shouldn't assume NK15's potential scum partner is in the nullread pile he made
um you probably shouldn't rely on my townread of dats very much because I am very biased and I don't think I ever scumread him ~__~
like he's just so handsome how can you scumread that face with that smile.
> regularly self-regulating to avoid flooding the thread/being too loud with uncertain takes
> open to new ideas while still coming into the thread with her own
> not really using popular thought in a way I can see as manipulative, like how you/me/std having similar reads or datisi/fire having similar reads could include scum copying bad reads to amplify them
> offering to stay out of the coalition and the only scummy player she's submitting into the coalition is nk15 which like WOW if their scum plan is "scumread each other hard and then argue about putting the other in the coalition and then immediately lim one and the other doesn't even look that clear"
> I can't really see ari as anyone's partner except like datisi I guess sorta kinda maybe?
> towny in tone
all of these points are valid
but she has a scary scumgame and the paranoia is difficult
and i'm not convinced she's out of her range
pedit u did misread him in that game where me/dats were convinced u were our traitor
I find this interesting. I'm curious for fire to actually pick who he would remove from the coalition, and if it would be me like his previous reads would suggest. Seems risky to bet the game on NK15 being town, though. Like his potential partner could still be.... skitter, or menalque, or datisi, or even maybe std, really. And almost nothing rules him out as scum
from this one? i guess so, yeah. we're not betting the game on it tho, we're just betting not winning the d1 game. and if youre saying he can be partners with skitt/mena/datisi then leaving him out isn't like a lock anyway
Posted: Wed May 11, 2022 3:58 pm
by Aristeia
but like if NK15 flipped scum I would definitely want to flip Dats as heartbreaking as that would be :[
I find this interesting. I'm curious for fire to actually pick who he would remove from the coalition, and if it would be me like his previous reads would suggest. Seems risky to bet the game on NK15 being town, though. Like his potential partner could still be.... skitter, or menalque, or datisi, or even maybe std, really. And almost nothing rules him out as scum
from this one? i guess so, yeah. we're not betting the game on it tho, we're just betting not winning the d1 game. and if youre saying he can be partners with skitt/mena/datisi then leaving him out isn't like a lock anyway
well if we're lockscumming mala for not playing then he can't really be partners with anyone but mala?
In post 771, Irrelephant11 wrote:anyway this is interesting. Honestly like 50-70% of my townread on datisi was that you and skitter both townread him (if one/two of you is town you're hopefully right, if you're both scummy mafs, well then by pure maths he's still town). I don't really wanntttt to reconsider my townread on datisi but good to know that I shouldn't assume NK15's potential scum partner is in the nullread pile he made
um you probably shouldn't rely on my townread of dats very much because I am very biased and I don't think I ever scumread him ~__~
like he's just so handsome how can you scumread that face with that smile.
indeed
i do find your scum-nk15 -> dats convincing tho
Posted: Wed May 11, 2022 3:59 pm
by fireisredsir
In post 787, Aristeia wrote:well if we're lockscumming mala for not playing then he can't really be partners with anyone but mala?
idk if we are but that does seem to be one of the most likely pairings fmpov
Posted: Wed May 11, 2022 4:01 pm
by skitter30
but yeah i guess i'll go through the thought experiment:
ari agreeing to be left out of a coalition of me/irrel/mena/std/dats
means it doesn't make sense for her to be scum with fire/mala/nk15
tbh i don't see anything impossible for ari + any of irrel/mena/std/dats
Posted: Wed May 11, 2022 4:03 pm
by Aristeia
I can give you a tip for reading me if you want skitter
Posted: Wed May 11, 2022 4:07 pm
by skitter30
I'd be interested!
Posted: Wed May 11, 2022 4:09 pm
by fireisredsir
i have ari/irrel marked as unlikely in my logic puzzle grid but i was too dumb to write any notes of justification for it so i don't remember why (:
Posted: Wed May 11, 2022 4:10 pm
by Aristeia
Spoiler: sekrit ari reading tip just for skitter no peeking elephantman
Of my 11 games that I've played on this site I've never randed scum at start even once. [the only time I've actually played as mafia is when I rep'd into a game to flirt with Dats and that sucked a lot]
This game makes #12.
I can't be mafia because I am an angel
Posted: Wed May 11, 2022 4:11 pm
by Aristeia
In post 794, fireisredsir wrote:i have ari/irrel marked as unlikely in my logic puzzle grid but i was too dumb to write any notes of justification for it so i don't remember why (:
it must be my very smooth interactions with our favorite elephant and I don't bother to pocket my partners in thread usually.
Posted: Wed May 11, 2022 4:11 pm
by fireisredsir
ha i already knew that fact cause i went looking earlier
In post 794, fireisredsir wrote:i have ari/irrel marked as unlikely in my logic puzzle grid but i was too dumb to write any notes of justification for it so i don't remember why (:
it must be my very smooth interactions with our favorite elephant and I don't bother to pocket my partners in thread usually.
it probably was interactions-based yea
most of them were about who wanted who in their coalitions but there were a few other reasonings
Posted: Wed May 11, 2022 4:19 pm
by Malakittens
by page 3 i have a townread on skitter for engaging with ari.
![:]](./images/smilies/icon_smiling.png "Cheerful Smile"){kind=icon}
