Mafiascum.net

In post 750, froggodoggo wrote:not getting much else from d1 other than somnus & enchant both have weird votes that were off-wagon and that BBT mightve said the thing abt the docs to guarantee a kill on ausuka

Didn’t goldfish claim an inno on him?

In post 751, Not_Mafia wrote:

In post 697, Fun Times wrote:

In post 693, Not_Mafia wrote:

In post 659, Fun Times wrote:

In post 568, Fun Times wrote:

In post 566, NorwegianboyEE wrote:

In post 561, Fun Times wrote:

In post 556, NorwegianboyEE wrote:

In post 552, Gamma Emerald wrote:the confidence in the scumflip?

That isn’t townie so i do not townclear them for this.

You actually SR me here? I mean, I'm not asking to be town cleared for limming a town, I just believe there a lot better people to focus on here

How right you were.

What's the question here? I was like one of the only people who actually gave a reason for that vote. Froggo voted too, so I find it interesting froggo is coming at us, like, I wrote yall a paragraph of my full thoughts on that situation, no one had questions at the time, yall just ran with it.

- Real talk, we need to hear from goldfish, I don't like the idea of just playing this game as if goldfish isn't here

-Andante

Yeah good point. I don’t tr them either.

Okay pal here's the thing, I don't need ro want your inner hydra dialogue in the main thread, this post belongs in your PT

Ask me if I care? Nope.

You don't care about town co-operating or communicating effectively

Don’t agree with you wrt hydra etiquette.

In post 752, Bellaphant wrote:

In post 747, froggodoggo wrote:

In post 217, Bellaphant wrote:I think sonmus is town

expand on this read pls?

I have already, like twice. Maybe bother andante less and read more?

Tbf it's really surprised me they were a check, they were my strongest tr day one.

Same for us.

In post 767, froggodoggo wrote:

In post 753, Fun Times wrote:

In post 700, froggodoggo wrote:

In post 644, Not_Mafia wrote:Now I'll throw the question back to you, cause you want to blame me for that lim, why were you even on it in the first place?

because a lot of their posts pinged me as scum and i wanted to pressure them to see if they could change my mind. quickhammering them does not accomplish that and in no way does my vote include anything abt wanting to kill them d1

why did you abusively pressure alianna? what was that supposed to accomplish? what sort of reaction were you looking for?

Really really dislike this post, for a fuckton of reasons.

list them

Well the most obvious was we didn’t quickhammer so Idk why you’re even mentioning that wrt to us. I already explained “abusive” and won’t elaborate further than its extremely offensive. It just really doesn’t sit right with me that for someone who was on her wagon and did nothing whatsoever to stop it, you have this ridiculously over the top reaction and are trying to pin it all on us.

In post 769, froggodoggo wrote:

In post 754, Fun Times wrote:

In post 703, froggodoggo wrote:

In post 654, Fun Times wrote:Andante actually said to me in our discord that she thinks mafia would fear kill us. I told her I don’t see why sunce we were wrong.

this is so lamist. there is no reason to post this other than to grab at town cred lol

The difference is we’re actually town and you probably aren’t.

how does that relate to literally anything????

Why are you pretending to play dumb here?

@frog, finding the use of language a little bit emotional: there must be better words than abusive And gaslit. Can we tone it down a little? Like, I'm not even parsing the conversation and these touch paper words aren't helpful

In post 772, froggodoggo wrote:

In post 759, Fun Times wrote:

In post 704, froggodoggo wrote:probably missed some stuff but reading through fun times play end of day 1 made me furious. i see the reasons for them being town but i want to personally be convinced.

So “furious” you still managed to overcome your so-called “rage” and help get her miselimed.

Have you ever heard the famous Shakespeare quote, “the lady doth protest too much”? That’s exactly what your posts read like to me.

?????????
am i being gaslit?????
the vote was practically quickhammered.
i wasnt THERE to prevent anything.

Yet another word, I’m taking issue with. Seriously just stop,

You don’t look particularly great wrt your vote on her wagon, so I just don’t buy all of this sturm and drang from you about how extremely upset you are and you directing it all at us. Had you been trying to actively stop the wagon at any point, I would probably tr you for this.

In post 780, Bellaphant wrote:@frog, finding the use of language a little bit emotional: there must be better words than abusive And gaslit. Can we tone it down a little? Like, I'm not even parsing the conversation and these touch paper words aren't helpful

+1

Thank you.

In post 776, Fun Times wrote:

In post 751, Not_Mafia wrote:

In post 697, Fun Times wrote:

In post 693, Not_Mafia wrote:

In post 659, Fun Times wrote:

In post 568, Fun Times wrote:

In post 566, NorwegianboyEE wrote:

In post 561, Fun Times wrote:

In post 556, NorwegianboyEE wrote:

In post 552, Gamma Emerald wrote:the confidence in the scumflip?

That isn’t townie so i do not townclear them for this.

You actually SR me here? I mean, I'm not asking to be town cleared for limming a town, I just believe there a lot better people to focus on here

How right you were.

What's the question here? I was like one of the only people who actually gave a reason for that vote. Froggo voted too, so I find it interesting froggo is coming at us, like, I wrote yall a paragraph of my full thoughts on that situation, no one had questions at the time, yall just ran with it.

- Real talk, we need to hear from goldfish, I don't like the idea of just playing this game as if goldfish isn't here

-Andante

Yeah good point. I don’t tr them either.

Okay pal here's the thing, I don't need ro want your inner hydra dialogue in the main thread, this post belongs in your PT

Ask me if I care? Nope.

You don't care about town co-operating or communicating effectively

Don’t agree with you wrt hydra etiquette.

In post 774, froggodoggo wrote:

In post 766, Not_Mafia wrote:

In post 748, froggodoggo wrote:

In post 234, Not_Mafia wrote:It's a bit early to be forming definitive opinions don't you think

when is this happening?

Wut

i'm asking you to give reads and push stuff instead of constantly shading me and making snarky comments. i saw one post from you with actual reads on people and i want more. with the amount of things you comment on ur clearly reading this game so what gives?

Is what you call shading not merely me articulating my suspicions on you

ok so... 2 things,
1) all those unsigned posts are from nancy

2) can we literally drop the conversation.. I commented on it to the extent it needed to be, and yall continuing it is just killing the gamestate. thanks, like, yall can still discuss reads. the matter between froggo and me has been taken care of, and I was reading those nancy posts like, if froggo thinks they're coming from me.... yeah no..

please drop it. thanks.

Yall, what are your thoughts on Goldfish "YO IM A N1 COP!!!! I wish yall didn't end day early" and then nothing else.... nothing...

-Andante (I have signed every single one of my posts)

In post 749, froggodoggo wrote:

In post 330, Somnus wrote:

In post 324, NorwegianboyEE wrote:I want you to be town, but like… it’s like you feel 2 townie 2 b town.
How do you think people should read you? Do you think you behave an certain way as scum?

Are you normally this skeptical of people you're hard town-reading? I see "too scummy to be scum" thrown around on this site way too much, but I don't think I've ever heard of "too townie to be town".

what were u looking for from this post? you vote norwee soon after anyways without them responding to it

I didn't have a pre-conceived answer I was looking for. I've had weird vibes from that slot since the start of the game, and it has nothing to do with RP'ing a character. Whether I got an immediate answer from it or not had no bearing on whether I felt it was appropriate to put out an early-game vote on a slot that I wasn't (and still aren't) town-reading.

In post 750, froggodoggo wrote:not getting much else from d1 other than somnus & enchant both have weird votes that were off-wagon and that BBT mightve said the thing abt the docs to guarantee a kill on ausuka

What makes it a weird vote? The fact that it wasn't automatically on the leading wagon that ended up flipping town barely 24 hours into the game?

Any thoughts on Somnus/Goldfish or no? Seems like only a couple of people have either even noticed or acknowledged Goldfish' entrance into the game.

In post 774, froggodoggo wrote:

In post 766, Not_Mafia wrote:

In post 748, froggodoggo wrote:

In post 234, Not_Mafia wrote:It's a bit early to be forming definitive opinions don't you think

when is this happening?

Wut

i'm asking you to give reads and push stuff instead of constantly shading me and making snarky comments. i saw one post from you with actual reads on people and i want more. with the amount of things you comment on ur clearly reading this game so what gives?

I do kind of agree with this though. Not_Mafia has been active and is clearly making observations, but virtually all of it just feels like casting 1-liners/shade and then moving on to the next person. Just kind of circling around to everyone (except maybe myself?), rinse, and repeat.

@fun times, you forgot 'i copped one of the few obv!town'.

Like....I can understand copping a person you were unsure on/wouldn't be able to read but that would be enchant/not mad/even penguin power for me, just because of playstyle.

I did want to give Goldfish some time to catch up and give some thoughts on other players in the game as well. I've played with her a couple of times before, and there's a pretty drastic timezone difference between her and I.

In post 788, Bellaphant wrote:@fun times, you forgot 'i copped one of the few obv!town'.

Like....I can understand copping a person you were unsure on/wouldn't be able to read but that would be enchant/not mad/even penguin power for me, just because of playstyle.

Oh? Link/quote? I don’t recall?

~Nancy btw

In post 772, froggodoggo wrote:

In post 759, Fun Times wrote:

In post 704, froggodoggo wrote:probably missed some stuff but reading through fun times play end of day 1 made me furious. i see the reasons for them being town but i want to personally be convinced.

So “furious” you still managed to overcome your so-called “rage” and help get her miselimed.

Have you ever heard the famous Shakespeare quote, “the lady doth protest too much”? That’s exactly what your posts read like to me.

?????????
am i being gaslit?????
the vote was practically quickhammered.
i wasnt THERE to prevent anything.

by Alianna. So why are you acting like it’s all Fun Times’ fault when Alianna’s response to reasonable sustained pressure was to nope out of the game?
Also, definitely not a fan of your continuing conduct in this game.

In post 780, Bellaphant wrote:@frog, finding the use of language a little bit emotional: there must be better words than abusive And gaslit. Can we tone it down a little? Like, I'm not even parsing the conversation and these touch paper words aren't helpful

“Touch paper”?
I probably understand the meaning of this less due to the existence of the phrase “touch grass”

Also did another cop claim happen today beyond Goldfish or did I dream that up?

In post 793, Gamma Emerald wrote:Also did another cop claim happen today beyond Goldfish or did I dream that up?

yeah cop that has you as maf.
gg gottem!!

-Andante

In post 793, Gamma Emerald wrote:Also did another cop claim happen today beyond Goldfish or did I dream that up?

Just Goldfish today and Enchant at the start of the game.

In post 794, Fun Times wrote:

In post 793, Gamma Emerald wrote:Also did another cop claim happen today beyond Goldfish or did I dream that up?

yeah cop that has you as maf.
gg gottem!!

-Andante

Do you actually suspect me or are you just making a tasteless joke?

So 2 dead cops and 2 claimed cops. Curious to see where this goes.

mmm wonder if it’s not ideal to hold a popcorn-style, no-night mass claim…

Probably not. Scum know the numbers.