Mafiascum.net

In post 7747, Alisae wrote:FUCK YOU

In post 1596, Bitmap wrote:I can't read Hectic so someone fill me in.

The only game I played with him was when I was on my alt for Undertale and I just really wanted to lynch him for the weird things he did as town.

In post 7744, gobbledygook wrote:The trackers apparently can actually catch scum or provide information to the town. Esp’s role was functionally useless from the beginning.

In post 7749, Sherlock and Watson wrote:

In post 7745, Hectic wrote:i appreciate it lol but saying "he's mason" isn't gonna change anyone's minds i don't think

giving reasons/showing posts would be helpful

reasons don't help with boon

have you read his posts or played with him

you either shut him down full stop or you don't

making productive arguments just makes him stomp his feet and shout louder

-S

In post 7750, Sherlock and Watson wrote:

In post 7747, Alisae wrote:FUCK YOU

who is this even directed at

In post 7753, Hectic wrote:i've never been on the receiving end and it is i guess not so surprisingly frustrating
the annoying thing is that he's convinced half the town

In post 7753, Hectic wrote:

In post 7749, Sherlock and Watson wrote:

In post 7745, Hectic wrote:i appreciate it lol but saying "he's mason" isn't gonna change anyone's minds i don't think

giving reasons/showing posts would be helpful

reasons don't help with boon

have you read his posts or played with him

you either shut him down full stop or you don't

making productive arguments just makes him stomp his feet and shout louder

-S

i've never been on the receiving end and it is i guess not so surprisingly frustrating
the annoying thing is that he's convinced half the town

In post 7756, Sherlock and Watson wrote:

In post 7753, Hectic wrote:i've never been on the receiving end and it is i guess not so surprisingly frustrating
the annoying thing is that he's convinced half the town

well town lacks direction because Titus has been MIA

we probably should have just pushed through one out of AF/Cerb a while ago and moved on with the day before town got bored and started forgetting their reads

-S

In post 7755, Sherlock and Watson wrote:Yeah 1596 spews Hectic town, good reminder

-S

In post 1601, Sherlock and Watson wrote:

In post 383, Hectic wrote:

this is a crumb which no one will see until i point it out later
i am a mason with Sherlock but not Watson

This is town af

-s

In post 1602, Sherlock and Watson wrote:

In post 431, Hectic wrote:we're in the moment though
imagine catching up to this

In post 627, Hectic wrote:

In post 609, Bitmap wrote:@Titus: WHY ARE YOU STILL TALKING ABOUT MASONS????????

Titus stop.

over reaction
she was explaining how drafting works without listing any names
please enter the FoS (Field of Suspects)

In post 646, Hectic wrote:

Spoiler: enjoy

In post 174, AaronFrost wrote:What up

town

In post 438, AaronFrost wrote:Anything important happen in these last 18 pages, because that'll effect how closely I read it.

pretty town

In post 442, AaronFrost wrote:

In post 439, Titus wrote:

In post 438, AaronFrost wrote:Anything important happen in these last 18 pages, because that'll effect how closely I read it.

We have 3+ ascetics. So, at least skim.

Claim whether you're ascetic as well please.

I am not ascetic

kinda town

In post 481, AaronFrost wrote:

In post 439, Titus wrote:

In post 438, AaronFrost wrote:Anything important happen in these last 18 pages, because that'll effect how closely I read it.

We have 3+ ascetics. So, at least skim.

Claim whether you're ascetic as well please.

K so going back to this, I trust Pine's claim which, if true, likely means one of the other two ascetic claims is scum.

town

In post 484, AaronFrost wrote:It would not surprise me at all if at least one of the people shitposting with Ali is scum. It's making the game a chore to read but I guess I shouldn't be surprised either.

PEDIT: Is that a serious question TSE?

extremely town

In post 497, AaronFrost wrote:

In post 487, TrueSoulEnergy wrote:

In post 484, AaronFrost wrote:It would not surprise me at all if at least one of the people shitposting with Ali is scum. It's making the game a chore to read but I guess I shouldn't be surprised either.

PEDIT: Is that a serious question TSE?

I tend to not read long walls of posts.

Ok but it's been a pretty big talking point in this game so far so I don't know how that's relevant?

https://wiki.mafiascum.net/index.php?title=Ascetic

very town

In post 504, AaronFrost wrote:

In post 501, Bitmap wrote:@TSE: I don't understand your vote on FL.

He spun a wheel... apparently

town

In post 509, AaronFrost wrote:

In post 508, TrueSoulEnergy wrote:

In post 507, Titus wrote:

In post 500, TrueSoulEnergy wrote:So you don’t know my role? Actually?

Unless you're a mason, no.

Oh fuck, my role fits me so well.

Oh shit I didn't know there was a jester in this game?

town

In post 524, AaronFrost wrote:

In post 515, Espeonage wrote:Could be literally being coached through every post. Which tbh I would believe Ali would set up. So you know what.

Vote: TSE

Are you saying that TSE is being coached? Because his posting says otherwise

kinda town

In post 530, AaronFrost wrote:

In post 528, Alisae wrote:Alright lock the thread
no more scumhunting

You can't tell me what to do. I'll scumhunt as much as I please.

scum
thought he didn't want to encourage Ali shitposting

In post 588, AaronFrost wrote:

In post 534, Espeonage wrote:

In post 524, AaronFrost wrote:

In post 515, Espeonage wrote:Could be literally being coached through every post. Which tbh I would believe Ali would set up. So you know what.

Vote: TSE

Are you saying that TSE is being coached? Because his posting says otherwise

You saying that you really believe that Ali wouldn't pick a shitposter then coach a shitposter on how to most effectively shitpost?

Because I 100% believe Ali is capable of that.

I don't think TSE needs coaching on how to shitpost but fair point

townish

In post 591, AaronFrost wrote:

In post 564, Maki and Kaito wrote:

In post 481, AaronFrost wrote:

In post 439, Titus wrote:

In post 438, AaronFrost wrote:Anything important happen in these last 18 pages, because that'll effect how closely I read it.

We have 3+ ascetics. So, at least skim.

Claim whether you're ascetic as well please.

K so going back to this, I trust Pine's claim which, if true, likely means one of the other two ascetic claims is scum.

Uh, he's not claiming ascetic though, and this is worded like you believe he is claiming ascetic - he's claiming ascetic enabler. If you're not paying close attention to his claim, how can you say you believe it?

I know what he claimed. My wording was off, as it usually is, but basically my thought was that if he's a town ascetic enabler, then one of Amrun/RR (the ascetic claims) is likely scum.

I should probably put my vote somewhere huh

VOTE: RR

scum
bad vote

In post 594, AaronFrost wrote:

In post 571, gobbledygook wrote:Can someone Tl;dr the game for me.

Amrun and RR both claimed ascetic, Pine claimed ascetic enabler, and bunch of people are shitposting.

That's about it

town

In post 595, AaronFrost wrote:

In post 589, Bitmap wrote:

In post 586, Spiffeh wrote:I would like more votes on Sherlock and Watson

Idk how many there are currently but I still want more

Sure, I don't like their lack of content and mason fishing.

VOTE: Sherlock and Watson

Where were they mason fishing? I skimmed a lot and probably missed some posts.

Most people haven't had a lot of useful content to be fair.

towny

In post 630, AaronFrost wrote:

In post 596, Reasonably Rational wrote:AF's argument has poor reasoning.

Most of my arguments do to be fair

The reason I think this is because ascetic is a helpful utility for scum and Pine also implied that he's some kind of PR in addition to being an ascetic enabler. I'm just setup speccing here, but that would give scum an interesting dilemma to deal with if that ever comes out and one of them was ascetic.

Scum could withhold their ascetic claim, but then they're likely to get caught in the lie whereas claiming it right away might give them townpoints.

towning

In post 632, AaronFrost wrote:Is there a list of who has claimed ascetic/not ascetic yet? If not I'll compile one in a bit

townary

In post 636, AaronFrost wrote:

In post 629, OkaPoka wrote:VOTE: aaronfrost

Using mech reasons to vote this early is kinda dodgy

I don't have solid enough reads to vote based off of non-mechanical reasons. I don't trust my D1 reads anyways.

AI in towniness

In post 638, AaronFrost wrote:

In post 633, Alisae wrote:Ah yes, D1 set up spec off of nothing
loving it!

I wouldn't call it nothing considering there's been lots of discussion around the ascetic claims. But you're scum so of course you have to discredit my arguments

scum

In post 640, AaronFrost wrote:Pine - Ascetic Enabler
Amrun - Ascetic
RR - Ascetic
Chemist - not ascetic
oka - not ascetic
bitmap - not ascetic
ank - not ascetic
hectic motherfucking hectic - not ascetic
spiff - not ascetic
espeonage - not ascetic
sherlock - not ascetic
maki - not ascetic
AF - not ascetic
FA - has not claimed
gobbles - has not claimed
Fl - has not claimed
TSE - has not claimed

If I missed any or got anything wrong let me know and I'll fix it

town AFF

Also looks pretty town

-s

In post 7762, Sherlock and Watson wrote:Oh yeah and Ank runs away whenever I try to talk to her so that's fun too

GG wanted AF until you skewed her read on Hectic which is probably going to turn this dayphase into an unreadable mess and useless for us tomorrow

-S

In post 7759, Flavor Leaf wrote:How so?

It seems like Bitmap chose to make hard stances on townies rather than the other way around. What part of this is townie for you with that in mind?

In post 7752, Sherlock and Watson wrote:

In post 7744, gobbledygook wrote:The trackers apparently can actually catch scum or provide information to the town. Esp’s role was functionally useless from the beginning.

disloyal fruit vendor is how boon was caught in EICN

it can get one guilty and a number of soft innos

-S

In post 7767, Sherlock and Watson wrote:

In post 7759, Flavor Leaf wrote:How so?

It seems like Bitmap chose to make hard stances on townies rather than the other way around. What part of this is townie for you with that in mind?

bitmap hard defended M&K so this is the opposite of reality

-S

In post 7766, Flavor Leaf wrote:Exactly like the last time I made a big lynch push right? When I got Maki lynched.

In post 7768, gobbledygook wrote:Yes. If scum do not know about it. Which Ali did know about it. Hence it was useless.

In post 7769, Flavor Leaf wrote:Also, Krazy is acting like the thread becoming a mess is a bad thing, but you can tell from the way he’s posting that it’s exactly what he wants because it muddies the waters with ScumHectic casing.

In post 1645, Sherlock and Watson wrote:Like if hectic is scum I do need to know it but I am not seeing it from the issues you pointed to right now, I see a lot of town thought process there, or at the very least a compelling emulation of town thought processes

the aaron towncase was a meme but it also felt really good to me because I felt like

we were seeing a lot of the same things in aaron.

I think it would be surprising for scum to be mind-melding with me about the same posts in at the same time for a lot of the same reasons

-S