Posted: Sat Apr 02, 2022 9:42 am
Yeah, if anything I'm known for death tunneling a townie at least once per game as townIn post 7770, DeasVail wrote:I don’t have the same expectation of FL/Boon being right in reads that you do
![Laughing :lol:](./images/smilies/icon_lol2.gif)
Yeah, if anything I'm known for death tunneling a townie at least once per game as townIn post 7770, DeasVail wrote:I don’t have the same expectation of FL/Boon being right in reads that you do
Yeah, I feel Frogster's in the space where he's trying to actively say as little as possible to not have any hard ties to them.In post 7795, tenebrousluminary wrote:I do quite think it is frog. He has done no solving and posted nothing town from day 2 on. But we can do eyes first and talk about it tomorrow.
The idea is that we build up assumptions to make the world seem less abstract and we avoid challenging those assumptions because it's effortful and induces psychic pain. When we're faced with incontrovertible evidence our assumptions are wrong (like being betrayed by someone close) our ego collapses and we experience psychic pain and everything seems more abstract. Jung suggested most of us actively avoid experiencing ego death because it's highly unpleasant. Jung also suggested going through it is important for the development of insight.In post 7794, tenebrousluminary wrote:Not really. I feel pretty confident there is going to be no point to this question.In post 7783, Frogsterking wrote:In post 7656, tenebrousluminary wrote:Prediction: If this flips town, Math will live and somehow find a way to blame me for it.Luminary,In post 7673, tenebrousluminary wrote:I am quite likely the only uncleared player who is not scum. I expect this game to end when Math decides to mislim me despite how painfully obvious my alignment should be because I did not strike his ego enough and dared to be right about a wide variety of topics, and I am preemptively mad about it.
VOTE: Frog
Are you familiar with the Jungian concept of ego death?
I have been playing a lot of Diplomacy on webdip, hopefully it's a sign of some positive change with my approach to social games.In post 7801, April Ludgate wrote:That vote on Eyes is one of the few pieces of action they've taken for a while, and it seems like a specifically chosen political vote, if that makes sense.
Thank youIn post 7786, DeasVail wrote:Frogster that reasoning seems… very early-game for this stage of the game.
I wonder how long before someone shouts distancing and decide to team me with Frog (whom I've been calling scum all game, btw. Ever since he asked that weird question about quantum mechanics and universe origins on day one)In post 7785, Frogsterking wrote:I'm thinking Eyes and Galron have really low activity counts so start pressuring there and see what they do VOTE: Eyes
Would it make the game status better if I went berserk? Is there anything I can say or do that would make my claim more believable to you/anyone else? I guess we both know the answer to these two questions so what's the point?In post 7808, DeasVail wrote:Eyes, it’s interesting to me that you haven’t responded to people clearly doubting your claim. You’ve had a lot to say about a lot of things, and based on your play here I would have expected you to be more outraged that your claim isn’t believed
As I said I picked the people to follow based on my own expectation of them making it long into the game. It would have been useless from my PoV to follow someone who was likely to get chopped soon anyway and that should also explain why I never followed you because I suspected you and expected you to go down sometime earlier.In post 7810, Frogsterking wrote:I have a couple questions for you.
Why did you select these players to follow when you did:
N1 STD (No Action)
N3 Deas (No Action)
And second, if you scum read me all game why did you never follow me?
Why did you expect D1 STD to survive for a long time and why did you expect D3 Dease to survive for a long time?In post 7811, Eyes without a face wrote:As I said I picked the people to follow based on my own expectation of them making it long into the game. It would have been useless from my PoV to follow someone who was likely to get chopped soon anyway and that should also explain why I never followed you because I suspected you and expected you to go down sometime earlier.In post 7810, Frogsterking wrote:I have a couple questions for you.
Why did you select these players to follow when you did:
N1 STD (No Action)
N3 Deas (No Action)
And second, if you scum read me all game why did you never follow me?
Yeet, April, Titus, DeaseIn post 7813, Eyes without a face wrote:STD presence wasn't much on D1 yet nobody was looking at him and it looked like there were at least 7 players that were being evaluated before anyone would even notice him. Deas was almost the same by D3. By D3 the game status looked like giving him a pass for a long time.
Who would you have picked to follow if you were me?
I don’t remember I am too lazy and feeling sick and you’re probably scum so??In post 7807, Eyes without a face wrote:@Math: You do realize that you have been shielding Frog for as long as you have been playing in this game, right? May I request you remind us of HEM's read on Frog in the masons thread?
You would have considered the guy that claimed ASCETIC???In post 7815, Frogsterking wrote:I would've seriously considered VP as well
What does this have to do with my question? And then people complain I am not participating enough! Sheesh!In post 7816, MathBlade wrote:I don’t remember I am too lazy and feeling sick and you’re probably scum so??In post 7807, Eyes without a face wrote:@Math: You do realize that you have been shielding Frog for as long as you have been playing in this game, right? May I request you remind us of HEM's read on Frog in the masons thread?
It means I lack the spoons and wim to answer it.In post 7818, Eyes without a face wrote:What does this have to do with my question? And then people complain I am not participating enough! Sheesh!In post 7816, MathBlade wrote:I don’t remember I am too lazy and feeling sick and you’re probably scum so??In post 7807, Eyes without a face wrote:@Math: You do realize that you have been shielding Frog for as long as you have been playing in this game, right? May I request you remind us of HEM's read on Frog in the masons thread?
I don’t think so.In post 7820, Eyes without a face wrote:Would you have been willing to do the effort if someone that was "probably not scum" asked instead of me?
Because I have to provide a read for a valid prod dodgeIn post 7822, Eyes without a face wrote:Then why did you add that specific bit when you could have stopped at mentioning lazy and sick??