Posted: Mon Dec 13, 2021 2:05 pm
Page top fool!
Please kill Pooky, Sircakez.
He’s trying to escape the evil ghost cage through AtE.
-Bell
imagine claiming that burying your opponent's content posts with one liner spam posts is actually town indicative.In post 7953, Milobird wrote:The real tell that shows I'm town this game is that I'm having fun and can't stop posting btw.
Just fyi.
-Bell
In post 7923, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:This is my full reply to the "mechcase" in which Notty claims it is suboptimal for them to double-tap TIL because they already used Perish Song on Her.
(1) The missed nightkill did not actually do anything to affect the game state - we ended up on evens and had to no-elim anyway to get back on odds.
(2) Drawing out the roleblocker early with a fake guilty is pretty useful when your team is low on players. A hidden roleblocker versus a solo scum is like equivalent to a cop in power level as every successful kill creates a "cleared" player who did not make the kill. The POE was already tight for you so you need to draw the roleblocker out as your team is in danger of being yeeted.
(3) There is also the added benefit of creating a fake guilty that can be pushed, perhaps saving Imaginality for another day. If the fake guilty had landed on somebody else, I think they probably just die that day and Imaginality escapes death on D3.
(4) If you actually win this game on this fake guilty, then the missed kill will have been well worth it.
These are all fairly important strategic benefits for there to be a missing kill on Night Three. It's actually quite possible you decided just to no kill on that night rather than shoot TIL.
I don't know what you did because I'm not mafia. You are, you have the benefit of knowing what went on. I do not.
You continue to claim it is suboptimal play to shoot TIL on N3, except as I've outlined above - there are significant advantages to a no-kill on that night. So much so that I think maybe you could've just no-killed intentionally.
Furthermore,
It's quite clear from when you put out this hitcase on me that you knew Dwlee was a delayed poisoner while I was under the impression he was a delayed nightkiller - meaning you are far more familiar with his role than me. Which makes sense because I'm not on his team and you are. I would know what Dwlee is if I was actually on a team with him.
Also if you actually believed in the validity of your case and think it's a slam dunk, you would not resort to flooding the thread with ate posts to drown out my defense against it. You would simply let the case rest on its own merits. Your very desperation shows that you don't actually believe in your mechcase. You simply repeat it over and over again.
Furthermore,
The game state you have been hyping all along. Which is that Pooky, Deepwolf Extraordinaire repped into this game, vigged his backup Godfather, and then tried to bus his actual Godfather, to go hyper deep wolf, directly contradicts your point about Pooky making the nightkill in the first place.
If the gameplan is for Scum!Pooky to vig his teammate for credit and then bus his other teammates, then there is literally no reason for Pooky to be committing the nightkill whatsoever.
At that point in the game I had not yet claimed to be a vig, I was certainly plausible as a block candidate. There is literally no reason for Deepwolf Pooky to make the nightkill. Losing your deepwolf to a tracker/blocker/watcher etc after you invest one dead scum to make him super strong makes basically 0 sense. Esp since Imaginality is not going to go deep since he was barely even playing the game at that point.
Lastly.
If you actually believed this pile of horseshit you call a case, you would've used it on Day 5, Day 6, Day 7, Day 8... You would not be waiting until the very last day of the game to pull it out of your ass and try to kill me with it. This is just cobbled together nonsense you have recycled from 6 game days ago because none of the other shit you were flinging at the wall was doing any good. SC moderately kind of thought this was plausible so you've decided to spam it over and over again hoping the more you type it the less it stinks.
The entire approach you have towards trying to case me today is just desperation spam attack in volume. Using shitlogic, AtE, random lies, and garbage. Your strategy is to bury this thread in so much filth and spam that nobody wants to read it and people just throw up their hands and give up because there's just so much shit being thrown.
Uh. It takes more than one person to vote a player to do that. Which even with the hard push I was fighting back and survived for awhile. I agree Hectic secured it, but there were ways for me to get out of it, that I just couldn't manage.In post 7944, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:I am so town I am practically glowing.In post 7941, Milobird wrote:No, you aren’t.
You’re a malevolent scum spirit.
Also, no Mastina straight up said she would kill me if didn’t give her something.
Hectic never claimed his result.
-Bell
Hectic didn't need to claim his result.
He literally put his entire rep on the line to claim you are scum
You died because Hectic hard pushed you to death.
It was day 2 of a large theme game where you were guilted by a cop who was highly influential and dominant in thread control.In post 7957, Milobird wrote:Uh. It takes more than one person to vote a player to do that. Which even with the hard push I was fighting back and survived for awhile. I agree Hectic secured it, but there were ways for me to get out of it, that I just couldn't manage.
-Bell
In post 7958, Milobird wrote:1. "Alls well that ends well"
2. No, just no. That doesn't make any sense to me, but maybe I'm just terrible at mechanics. Sircakez would be better at this. But I dunno why we would bother when we already have similar role in Gamma to shoot.
3. Alls well that ends well part deux. With soft benefits being weighed equally with hard benefits. Which yeah. I just don't deal in soft benefits.
4. All well that ends well part TREUX. Oh my god. WHy. Just why are you making this terrible argument Pooky. Like it's absurd on its face.
Just because things worked out that way does not in anyway mean scum planned it. Like, you just look bad based on the available evidence. Because you're scum and SCUM LOOK BAD WHEN THEY GET ROLE BLOCKED AND THERE ARE NO ALTERNATIVE EXPLANATIONS THAT MAKE SENSE.
I have refuted your nonsense. How's it feel?
-Bell
It's because I'm town and I have no reason to ask about how a dead player's role works because that player is deadIn post 7961, Milobird wrote:Also in regards to pretending you don't know how your partner's role works. I can think of one reason you might pretend not to know how your partner's role works!
It's a pretty good one.
-Bell
In post 7958, Milobird wrote:1. "Alls well that ends well"
2. No, just no. That doesn't make any sense to me, but maybe I'm just terrible at mechanics. Sircakez would be better at this. But I dunno why we would bother when we already have similar role in Gamma to shoot.
3. Alls well that ends well part deux. With soft benefits being weighed equally with hard benefits. Which yeah. I just don't deal in soft benefits.
4. All well that ends well part TREUX. Oh my god. WHy. Just why are you making this terrible argument Pooky. Like it's absurd on its face.
Just because things worked out that way does not in anyway mean scum planned it. Like, you just look bad based on the available evidence. Because you're scum and SCUM LOOK BAD WHEN THEY GET ROLE BLOCKED AND THERE ARE NO ALTERNATIVE EXPLANATIONS THAT MAKE SENSE.
I have refuted your nonsense. How's it feel?
-Bell
In post 7964, Milobird wrote:Yeah, you keep saying it's nonsense when your argument is based on the premise that because something ended up a certain way the scum must've planned it. As if scum don't try to play optimally. Get real. These are unoptimal solutions you're proposing to a problem that has simple answers.
-Bell
In post 7966, Milobird wrote:Those aren't strategies you literally are pointing out that it makes you look bad!
It's a failure to apply Okham's razor!
It's horrible!
-Bel
this is just spamIn post 7971, Milobird wrote:An interesting position to take Pooky the magical Bear. *nods sagely*
You think we're scum in elo while we're voting each other and Sircakez hasn't voted either of us do you?
What brashness, what youth!
-Bell