Page 33 of 41

Posted: Thu Apr 23, 2009 4:54 pm
by Albert B. Rampage
ZEEnon wrote:
Hmm.. well that is true Albert B. Rampage. Despite that, I will not change from Gorrad.
I am determined in his lynch, although I am not against a GLaDOS' lynch.
Swear to me that you will lynch Glados tomorrow and I will vote for Gorrad on the spot. I want your oath signed in blood though.

Posted: Thu Apr 23, 2009 4:54 pm
by Mastin
FULL CLAIM:

As I said, I'm Kiego Asano. I'm very active and a bit paranoid (possible hints at latent abilities involving running/investigation) student. I'm vaguely spiritually aware (further possible hint at latent abilities involving investigation).

My win condition is the town, obviously. I wasn't even told what Kiego's role was, although it wasn't hard to guess it was vanilla townie.

[/claim]
So, thusfar, correct me if I am wrong:

Claims:
Mastin---Kiego, Minor C., Townie.
Jebus---Mizuiro, Minor C., Townie.
Albert---Karin, Minor C., ?
Green---A spirit kid, Minor C., passive ability.
X---Don, Minor C., Enabler.
Korlash---Different spirit kid, Minor C., Enabler.
ZEE---Yuzu, Minor C., Nurse.

Glados---Chad, Major C., One-shot bulletproof.
Gorrad---Rukia, Major C., Jailer.

Gorrad's claim seems bs.
1: Rukia couldn't cast BASIC kido at the time. Six Rods is 50. She couldn't do that until the Hueco Mundo arc.
2: Six rods imprisons, alright, but how on earth, soul society, Hueco Mundo, or whatever, do they protect?
3: Jailkeeper would overpower the town,
4: He was only one of two major character claims.
Did I miss anything? Gorrad, you've got one chance to defend yourself before you earn my vote.

Posted: Thu Apr 23, 2009 4:56 pm
by Albert B. Rampage
I'm okay with lynching Gorrad but WE HAVE TO LYNCH GLADOS tomorrow.

Posted: Thu Apr 23, 2009 4:57 pm
by Mastin
Albert wrote:Swear to me that you will lynch Glados tomorrow and I will vote for Gorrad on the spot. I want your oath signed in blood though.
If Gorrad flips scum, there's not a chance that I'd NOT vote Glados. If he's town, then my theory is flawed.

Posted: Thu Apr 23, 2009 4:58 pm
by Albert B. Rampage
Vote Gorrad


Ya better be scum, mate.

Posted: Thu Apr 23, 2009 4:59 pm
by GLaDOS
... Processing ...

Definitely suggest that nobody hammers Gorrad right now. We have a week until deadline hits, and Albert B. Rampage is
still
not claiming his role.

Posted: Thu Apr 23, 2009 5:00 pm
by ZEEnon
I know i'm going to regret this, but fine.
I promise you that even if she is proven innocent, I will vote her down tomorrow.

Image

Posted: Thu Apr 23, 2009 5:00 pm
by Albert B. Rampage
Unvote


Wait a second, I have just figured out how to explain to you guys that Glados is scum.

Posted: Thu Apr 23, 2009 5:04 pm
by ZEEnon
Please explain Albert B. Rampage.
Also, seeing as the end of the day draws near:

- Xtoxm, please target Albert B. Rampage tonight.
- Korlash, please target me tonight.

Reasons for the targets:

I think Albert B. Rampage has a latent ability.
(If you disagree ABR, please say so)
Also, I trust Xtoxm's claim more.
I'd rather have ABR'S ability unlocked rather than my own.

Posted: Thu Apr 23, 2009 5:06 pm
by Albert B. Rampage
ZEEnon wrote:
Please explain Albert B. Rampage.
Also, seeing as the end of the day draws near:

- Xtoxm, please target Albert B. Rampage tonight.
- Korlash, please target me tonight.

Reasons for the targets:

I think Albert B. Rampage has a latent ability.
(If you disagree ABR, please say so)
Also, I trust Xtoxm's claim more.
I'd rather have ABR'S ability unlocked rather than my own.
You're right on the money.

All right fine.

Vote: Gorrad

Posted: Thu Apr 23, 2009 5:07 pm
by Albert B. Rampage
ZEEnon is either confirmed town with a similar role to me, or is mafia that somehow knows my role.

Posted: Thu Apr 23, 2009 5:11 pm
by Gorrad
I have no defense. I did not write the setup. I cannot tell you why I have the role I do. Lynch me if you want, but get ZEEnon tomorrow.

Posted: Thu Apr 23, 2009 5:13 pm
by ZEEnon
Hmm . . . *always gets swayed by appeals to emotion*

Posted: Thu Apr 23, 2009 5:14 pm
by Green Crayons
DOS wrote:...and a more complete claim from Green Crayons.
Meaning?

Posted: Thu Apr 23, 2009 5:16 pm
by ZEEnon
Scratch that
, nevermind.
He is voting GLaDOS, yet tells the town to lynch me tomorrow.


Do we have a hammer?

Image

Posted: Thu Apr 23, 2009 5:19 pm
by GLaDOS
... Processing ...
Green Crayons wrote:I have a passive ability that I do not want to claim at the moment.

Posted: Thu Apr 23, 2009 5:19 pm
by OhGodMyLife
Vote Count:
5 to lynch

Gorrad: 4 (Xtoxm, ZEEnon, Green Crayons, Albert B. Rampage)
GLaDOS: 1 (Gorrad)

Not Voting: 4 (GLaDOS, Mastin, Jebus, Korlash)

Posted: Thu Apr 23, 2009 5:19 pm
by Albert B. Rampage
Hammer please.

Korlash enable ZEEnon so he can be a full doctor.

Xtoxm enable me so I can be a cop.

ZEE, protect me.

Posted: Thu Apr 23, 2009 5:21 pm
by GLaDOS
... Processing ...

Albert B. Rampage makes a rather bad argument that because I have claimed that I survive the first nightkill on me, that I am scum. Allow me to quickly demonstrate how this is incorrect.

1.)
When I claimed my role, the Serial Killer was already dead, and there have been no indicators that there are any killing roles beyond that of a Serial Killer. Albert B. Rampage essentially implying that not only could the mafia redirect the Serial Killer kills, but that a member of the mafia could also survive at least one Serial Killer kill.

2.)
Even the most cursory of glances at past OhGodMyLife games show that our mod has a penchant for including partial nightkill-immune roles in various ways.

->
a.)
In Medieval Mafia there were members of the town who were immune only to kills from particular members of the mafia.
->
b.)
In SPQR Mafia the mafia had to keep a particular member of the mafia alive in order to nightkill at all.
->
c.)
In Satin Doll Showdown, there were no such restrictions on nightkills. However, the game did include the presence of a Jailkeeper as well as a Governor (who could prevent lynches).
->
d.)
In New Age Mafia there were no such roles that I can see, although the role PMs were not posted to my knowledge. The only protective role was a “weak doctor” (the mechanics of which I do not know), but the town also had a Vigilante to compete with the two scum groups. Note that the game also had two town Trackers, and based on this I do not think it is unreasonable to have two town Spirit Enablers in this game who use different flavor.

Obviously not all of the games share a common theme, but this actually supports me in this case. None of the set-ups from OhGodMyLife have been
too
similar, but they all had reasonable ways to counteract the scum’s nightkills (with immunity to certain killers; restrictions on which members the mafia can kill with; a jailkeeper and a governor; and a weak doctor with a Vigilante).

3.)
Assume for the sake of argument that Gorrad is scum. This means that – with the claims as they are currently – only one person in the game had any semblance of protection on Night One, and that person would be me. This would necessitate that the mafia no-killed on Night One.

That theory is ridiculous in that this would keep the game at 11 players rather than reducing the game to 10 players. This effectively gives the town a free lynch. Any ‘advantage’ that might be gained by trying to use the lack of nightkill to bolster a claim is immediately counterbalanced by the fact that such a claim would have to survive an additional day and night of scrutiny.

~

I would like to hear his theory on how he can "prove" that I am scum. He also needs to fully claim his role. What do you mean by becoming a "full" Cop? Do you have any results?

Posted: Thu Apr 23, 2009 5:21 pm
by Green Crayons
DOS wrote:... Processing ...
Oh, then no. You have enough already. (And, wow. Lots of people on tonight. Thread grew really quickly.)

Posted: Thu Apr 23, 2009 5:25 pm
by GLaDOS
... Processing ...

Advising again that a hammer vote is not preferable here, even if Gorrad is scum. We just had a lot of information thrown at us and it needs to be properly processed. We literally have seven more days before deadline hits, and I see no benefit in ending today as quickly as Albert B. Rampage is trying to do.

Posted: Thu Apr 23, 2009 5:25 pm
by Gorrad
Xtoxm, ZEEnon, GLaDOS...they're all scummy.

Posted: Thu Apr 23, 2009 5:25 pm
by Albert B. Rampage
Glados' incessant rolefishing is noted.

Posted: Thu Apr 23, 2009 5:26 pm
by Mastin
Gorrad wrote:I have no defense. I did not write the setup. I cannot tell you why I have the role I do. Lynch me if you want, but get ZEEnon tomorrow.
Kthnxdienao.

I am satisfied that we have enough info for today. Albert's claim was satisfactory (contrary to what Glados says), in my eyes (also, Zee seems to confirm Albert), and Gorrad blew his chance to defend himself.
More than enough for me.
Anyone object to a hammer? (BESIDES Glados)

Posted: Thu Apr 23, 2009 5:26 pm
by Albert B. Rampage
Why would Glados try to rolefish on a player (me) she thinks is town?? Because she's scum, that's why.