Mafiascum.net

well how do you propose we decide on who to lynch? Everyone has their own opinion.

I didn't say that they were town. I just said that they weren't acting wolfy. There can be Indies in this game. You never know until the game is over.

In post 798, MonkeyMan576 wrote:

In post 796, Svenskt Stål wrote:its a good thing? How?

Why not Malcolm?

Why would it be a bad thing that we know who is scummy?

I would be fine with malcolm but we need to lynch the scummiest.

Maybe we should get everyone NOT on the shit list to list everyone their top 5 shitty players, and figure out some sort of points system to figure out who to lynch.

What? it creates a whole lot of shitfest when "who is scummy" is everyone except 4 or 5 people!

The downside is that we lynch someone working on the game that just is reaching wierd conclusions.

Lynch is decided by majority. But its early, its day 1, so we loose ALOT of value if we are wrong about an active player, especially in a game where alot of people aint trying.

I feel like I am okay with alot of names, I just want to ensure that our lynch isnt negative. Lets get a safe lynch, see what scum do an go from there.

STAHP LURKING!!!!!!!1!!

In post 802, Svenskt Stål wrote:

In post 798, MonkeyMan576 wrote:

In post 796, Svenskt Stål wrote:its a good thing? How?

Why not Malcolm?

Why would it be a bad thing that we know who is scummy?

I would be fine with malcolm but we need to lynch the scummiest.

Maybe we should get everyone NOT on the shit list to list everyone their top 5 shitty players, and figure out some sort of points system to figure out who to lynch.

What? it creates a whole lot of shitfest when "who is scummy" is everyone except 4 or 5 people!

The downside is that we lynch someone working on the game that just is reaching wierd conclusions.

Lynch is decided by majority. But its early, its day 1, so we loose ALOT of value if we are wrong about an active player, especially in a game where alot of people aint trying.

I feel like I am okay with alot of names, I just want to ensure that our lynch isnt negative. Lets get a safe lynch, see what scum do an go from there.

Let's see how far we can get with an ArcAngel wagon. I bet she shows up in a couple seconds.

VOTE: arcangel

would have liked a malcolm wagon more thou. nacho is supposed to be a good player.

Angel would be an excellent utility lynch but so would Jebus and squid.

true, but angel apparantly can post.

She apparently does this a lot though but I wouldn't cry to see her gone.

she is posting in other places.

nacho lurking.

She tends to post more regularly as town.

Darthe, what color is your role?

In post 794, Svenskt Stål wrote:sup nacho, gonna be productive?

I'm lynching scum at the moment, no need to be more productive than I already am.

fantastic, easier for me to kill you.

Sven, why are you voting Arc?

for a lurker you dont keep up to date.

Okay Im back dudes

As in Vifam is back wasup

In post 800, MonkeyMan576 wrote:well how do you propose we decide on who to lynch? Everyone has their own opinion.

By developing an excellent scum read, establishing a bulletproof case proving that read, and convincing the other players to follow you. That was a silly question, and being in support of a system that essentially removes accountability from the equation is scum motivated.

Damm Im not trying to read this

so what are you gonna do?

Usually I'd play it by ear but since SGR is here I'll wait for him to summarize it


Why are we voting ArcAngel

In post 819, Desperado wrote:

In post 800, MonkeyMan576 wrote:

Vote: ArcAngel9

dat vote!!!

why should we waste time explaining things to someone who comes and goes as he pleases