Page 33 of 79

Posted: Mon Jun 24, 2013 4:28 pm
by Psyche
This just keeps getting better and better. ^_^

Okay, so Varsoon is fine. Not because of his claim, but despite it.
Let's focus on TIP-Zoidberg.

Posted: Mon Jun 24, 2013 4:29 pm
by Psyche
unvote


I should note for posterity that I still think NS is scum.

Posted: Mon Jun 24, 2013 4:29 pm
by Zoidberg
In post 792, TheIrishPope wrote:Tracer Bullet, Calvin's alter-ego
Yeah, I fakeclaimed. I'm actually Calvin as a Tiger.

I knew TIP was Tracer Bullet when he made his "we lynch zoidberg NOW" post. I tried to get him to hush once I realized what was going on:
In post 576, Zoidberg wrote:
In post 572, TheIrishPope wrote:We lynch Zoidberg
NOW
Hold that thought for a sec. Just hush. I know what I'm doing.
In post 578, Zoidberg wrote:
In post 572, TheIrishPope wrote:We lynch Zoidberg
NOW
I know what you are going to say. Just wait.
I also tried to get TIP not to fakeclaim, but I couldn't do it directly without outing TIP since I'd have to announce to scum that TIP was a power role:
In post 680, Zoidberg wrote:
In post 679, Zoidberg wrote:Are you also claiming to be Tracer Bullet, Professional Snoop?
Because if you're going to do that, think about this:
Scum always are given safe fakeclaims. If I was fakeclaiming scum, I would have been given (and thus would have claimed) a role that doesn't collide with anyone.


So I want you to think very carefully about how you plan on weaseling out of this one.
Obviously my plan was flawed. Sorry TIP.

At this point, though, I'm ready to call TIP pretty much conftown based on his reaction D1. I very much doubt that Tracer Bullet is 3rd party.

Posted: Mon Jun 24, 2013 4:30 pm
by Zoidberg
In post 802, Zoidberg wrote:I also tried to get TIP not to
fakeclaim
Sorry, this ought to read "counterclaim"

Posted: Mon Jun 24, 2013 4:31 pm
by TheIrishPope
I noticed. That's why I kept quiet. Hmm.

Posted: Mon Jun 24, 2013 4:31 pm
by Desperado
are you fucking serious

Posted: Mon Jun 24, 2013 4:31 pm
by Psyche
So...I need you to explain why you did that, and then fullclaim again.

Posted: Mon Jun 24, 2013 4:31 pm
by Desperado
In post 806, Psyche wrote:So...I need you to explain why you did that, and then fullclaim again.

Posted: Mon Jun 24, 2013 4:32 pm
by Mr E Roll
Irish if you knew Zoidberg fake claimed why didnt you track him?

Posted: Mon Jun 24, 2013 4:33 pm
by Rubicon
Varsoon, could you link me to some of your scum games?

@ Desperado -
Varsoon targets Skull, but is redirected to Radioactive Wolf. For all other game mechanic purposes, it should appear as though Varsoon targeted Radioactive Wolf. Therefore we should not be surprised that TIP says Varsoon targeted Radioactive Wolf.

Posted: Mon Jun 24, 2013 4:34 pm
by TheIrishPope
I didn't know he fakeclaimed; there might be duplicates in this game
Varsoon was much better

Posted: Mon Jun 24, 2013 4:34 pm
by Zoidberg
In post 751, Psyche wrote:
In post 750, TheIrishPope wrote:Nono; it's not that you used a night action, it's that you visited Radioactive. If you originally visited someone else, it would have said their name, not Radioactive's.
false
Mod: hypothetically, if there was a tracker, and the tracker's target was redirected from A to B, would the tracker's result show the target visiting A or B?

Posted: Mon Jun 24, 2013 4:34 pm
by Rubicon
In post 808, Mr E Roll wrote:Irish if you knew Zoidberg fake claimed why didnt you track him?
^ this

Posted: Mon Jun 24, 2013 4:34 pm
by Desperado
Yes I'm aware of how game mechanics work.

Now explain how this doesn't implicate Varsoon as Radioactive's killer.

Posted: Mon Jun 24, 2013 4:34 pm
by Skullduggery
Yeah, maybe I'm just being dense, Zoidberg (and if I am, I fully expect you to give me the snarkiest of replies), but why fakeclaim Tracer Bullet in the first place? What was the problem with saying your real flavor name?

Posted: Mon Jun 24, 2013 4:35 pm
by Psyche
In post 810, TheIrishPope wrote:I didn't know he fakeclaimed; there might be duplicates in this game
Varsoon was much better
Duplicates? Now that would be funny.

Seriously, Zoidberg. Explanation and fullclaim.

Posted: Mon Jun 24, 2013 4:35 pm
by Mr E Roll
If you thought there were duplicates why did you want to lynch him immediately?

Posted: Mon Jun 24, 2013 4:36 pm
by Dante
Still looks scummy from here...but if he didn't...does he bring that much to the hunt that we want to keep a miller?

Posted: Mon Jun 24, 2013 4:36 pm
by Varsoon
@Zoid: I'm glad you're continuing to ignore when I explain things. Something you should probably not ignore is TIP's belated counter-claim.

@Skull: You are awesome, which is why I wanted to neighbor you. Also, as was explained before, it'd be pretty dumb for a scum-varsoon to try carrying out the NK for his team, given the heat on me at the end of D1. It's a lot more plausible that one of the scum-teams that made the radio-wolf NK also had my actions redirected to radio, so that in the case of a tracker following me, the case could be levied against me for a mislynch. I've also opened to the idea that TIP and I are both town and that there's definitely town motivation behind tracking me, and that it makes sense for town-TIP to also raise a case against me given the return on his track. Regardless, given that TIP has counter-claimed Zoidberg, I really don't see how we can't lynch at least one of the two today, given there's got to be scum between them.

P-EDIT:

@Zoidberg: You're absolutely lying. You've been caught again and now you're squirming very hard. I don't buy it for a minute. Why would town lie about their role? What do you have to gain? Also, how could you possibly know there was another tracer bullet in the game before you claimed?


@Desperado: I already explained why a trace on me would turn up that way. I did before traces were even mentioned. I did not know I was traced until TIP said he traced me.

@Rubicon: Coming up, gimme a sec.

Posted: Mon Jun 24, 2013 4:37 pm
by TheIrishPope
Because it makes sense NOW, after I tracked Varsoon

Posted: Mon Jun 24, 2013 4:38 pm
by MonkeyMan576
Any hypothetically redirected night action would show the redirected result.

Posted: Mon Jun 24, 2013 4:39 pm
by Psyche
also found this on wiki

Mom-Lady has a "mind scrambling eyeball ray" that wills the victim to "do her nefarious bidding," and Baby Sitter Girl has a similar power of using a "psycho beam" which weakens "Stupendous Man's stupendous will"

so i speculate that Mom's the redirector and Baby Sitter's a RBer.

And that this game is packed with PRs.

Posted: Mon Jun 24, 2013 4:39 pm
by Desperado
In post 818, Varsoon wrote:@Desperado: I already explained why a trace on me would turn up that way. I did before traces were even mentioned. I did not know I was traced until TIP said he traced me.
That's great, but as scum you have no choice BUT to explain why the track would turn up that way. If you hadn't been redirected, and Skull had died instead, and TIP still tracked you, you'd just be saying the same thing.

"I tried to neighborize Skull but he's dead now so if you tracked me to him that's why, and btw if you got a guilty on me it's because I'm a miller."

And claiming scum and then later saying that that was a breadcrumb to you being a miller is just...it's out there, man.

Posted: Mon Jun 24, 2013 4:41 pm
by Rubicon
In post 822, Desperado wrote:
In post 818, Varsoon wrote:@Desperado: I already explained why a trace on me would turn up that way. I did before traces were even mentioned. I did not know I was traced until TIP said he traced me.
That's great, but as scum you have no choice BUT to explain why the track would turn up that way. If you hadn't been redirected, and Skull had died instead, and TIP still tracked you, you'd just be saying the same thing.

"I tried to neighborize Skull but he's dead now so if you tracked me to him that's why, and btw if you got a guilty on me it's because I'm a miller."

And claiming scum and then later saying that that was a breadcrumb to you being a miller is just...it's out there, man.
Why would Varsoon assume he'd been tracked? If he thought he was going to be tracked, why would he have done the kill in the first place?

Posted: Mon Jun 24, 2013 4:42 pm
by Zoidberg
In post 757, Psyche wrote:Question to everyone reading:

Are Varsoon's posts, absent his claims, scummy?
Yes. Lying is scummy. I asked multiple times, and finally asked: Yes or no, concrete proof that I am scum? to which he replied yes.

That is a lie, because I am town and therefore no such proof can possibly exist unless this game is bastard.

Breadcrumbing a role means 2 things: jack and shit. Anyone can breadcrumb a role: See State Farm Mafia where AP breadcrumbed 2 different fakeclaims in the same game.