Oh I should of mentioned those reads are in order. You moved down to scum number two.
Posted: Sun Oct 13, 2013 2:44 pm
by notscience
With deadline coming up you better
1) Get on a better wagon
2) Provide a decent case/actually push your scumreads
js
Posted: Sun Oct 13, 2013 2:54 pm
by Peabody
In post 800, Garmr wrote:Oh I should of mentioned those reads are in order. You moved down to scum number two.
I don't understand this. You unvoted me because you were waiting for my reads. Then you switched to ns.
Posted: Sun Oct 13, 2013 3:22 pm
by Garmr
I always had a scum read on NS, also I had scum read on kaze slot as well and I wanted to see if you would change that so far you haven' but you knocked it down a bit. It's hard to get rid of that feeling kaze was scum and read you fresh.
Posted: Sun Oct 13, 2013 3:44 pm
by Peabody
If I didn't change your mind so far, why did ns jump to the top of your list?
Posted: Sun Oct 13, 2013 3:55 pm
by Garmr
When you replaced kaze I went back and looked at NS and he still hasn't done anything till post meaningful till post 784. I was just wondering why the change in play style. What made that point in time the time to change.
Posted: Sun Oct 13, 2013 4:00 pm
by notscience
I just finished the premiere of my new style, rofl
Posted: Sun Oct 13, 2013 5:56 pm
by pitoli
Posted: Sun Oct 13, 2013 6:09 pm
by SpyreX
SpyreX, do you think your playstyle has changed since Artemis Fowl?
What about since Through a Puppy's Eyes?
My playstyle is very capricious. I'm definitely playing 'different' (re worse) then in the golden ages but Through a Puppy's Eyes was a terrible game and really made me realize it was time for a break. I'm still not into any groove and even when I'm in a groove that groove is really different depending on the game.
Like this - the fire under my belly helped, but it is restalling. The replacementitis KILLS me amazingly fast and throws me all out of wack, almost every time. And that clearly hasn't changed from rereading.
Aside from hating the formatting I do like NS's post. I'm not sold on it 100%, but.
I dont know what to think about SO WILD AND CRAZY Grimgroove - the river of thought feels more town than not.
If we dont see activity, I am not in favor of an extension.
Posted: Sun Oct 13, 2013 6:16 pm
by SleepyKrew
I ask because in Artemis, your first post was a replacement catch-up post full of reads and you voted your top scumread
In Puppy you hammered with your first post
But no vote early from you in this game
And I just don't know how to take this
Can you talk me through why you didn't vote Aero please?
Or just quote if you've said it before
Posted: Sun Oct 13, 2013 6:30 pm
by SpyreX
Because I didn't want a page 5 lolwagon to accidently hammer.
To you, ffery, CDB:
One bullet. Who dies.
Posted: Sun Oct 13, 2013 6:32 pm
by SleepyKrew
Brian
Posted: Sun Oct 13, 2013 6:34 pm
by SleepyKrew
lolwagon?
Are you saying the Aero wagon wasn't serious?
Posted: Sun Oct 13, 2013 6:35 pm
by SpyreX
Pffft
Boring answer from boring town.
I still dont see that being scum.
---
No, I mean more I didn't want the day to end that fast. I should watch my wording I suppose in my old age
In post 455, ChannelDelibird wrote:Chewing on it. This is either my first time playing with him or my first time in a long, long time. Empire's post was well argued but I saw enough in Spyrex's response not to jump on it yet. By reputation, I don't want us to mislynch Spyrex on Day 1 if we can avoid it so I'm probably more likely to see reasons to keep him alive than I am to lynch him, I suppose.
Could you expand on this? What is his reputation? Does he get mislynched early with some frequency?
I don't know how often Spyrex gets mislynched but AFAIK he has a reputation of being an excellent scumhunter. I just read this post in MD which reinforced that feeling in a timely manner.
Spyrex- Calls me town, no reasoning. I feel like "oh if he's town he's a deadly scumhunter" is a bad reason to keep someone alive js.
is a baldfaced lie.
So, I finally figured out what you meant by notscience lying. Is there a reason why notscience had to be lying instead of having a misunderstanding of the game?
Posted: Sun Oct 13, 2013 8:07 pm
by SpyreX
There's no misunderstanding. We're not confirmed. However, no matter what you want to call it, saying I had no reasoning is a baldfaced lie.