Mafiascum.net

you missed out #618, which links to #619. again, try actually reading the whole thread like someone who was TOWN would do, rather than just search for your name lazily like someone who is SCUM would do

Votecount 2.01

With 12 alive, it takes 7 to lynch.

bubbajack8 – Sakura Hana
Mario4 – Nachomamma8, Marquis
BoroPhil – Dry-Fit
Sakura Hana – bubbajack8
Marquis – Mario4, Ms Marangal
Neonizer – BoroPhil

Not Voting – Marcrell, startfromtheheart, notscience, Neonizer

Deadline is in (expired on 2013-11-24 02:33:08)

Ms Marangal is V/LA through Tuesday

In post 796, Sakura Hana wrote:

In post 795, bubbajack8 wrote:

In post 782, Sakura Hana wrote:

In post 780, bubbajack8 wrote:The fact you posted this 3 people seems VERY forced.

Actually I didn't realize you were voting ns since before. Tbf ns forced a no lynch by voting SoS and then leaving like "screw deadline"

Which makes it seem more forced. You thought that me, sos, and not were "forcing a nl" When in reality you failed to check. NS I understand. Me and SOS were on wagons that actually could have gone somewhere.

If anything YOUR statements feel like they are following some sort of scum agenda, you yourself said yesterday that it was better to no lynch than lynch town, which means you wanted to force a no lynch on purpose. According to this post:

In post 738, bubbajack8 wrote:A nl is better then a ml and 2 townies dead.

And then after deadline had expired, you post something like this because you messed up and wanted to look more town:

In post 747, bubbajack8 wrote:I believe we can still hammer even though deadline expired.

Which is funny how you telegraphed your own scum agenda with your RVS Vote:

In post 8, bubbajack8 wrote:VOTE: Sakura Hana The club can't even handle me.

Unvote
Vote: bubba

A nl is better then a ml. I stand by that, and I can see how you got confused there, but you still failed to double check on me, and SOS. You just knew what I had said and that you could scrape by with it.
I did say you could still hammer after deadline. Who was avaliable for hammering? Oh NS. And oh would you look at that? I was voting him. Those 2 comments DONT contradict themselves. Good try though.
LOL like RVS has anything to do with anything. And some great BS to go with that OMGUS. (:

In post 773, BoroPhil wrote:does anyone want to think about why SoS was the target? That is good information we have to use. Was it because they were obviously town? Or on to something? Or a double-bluff? Thoughts, please.

There seems to be a cliché that Night kill analysis is WIFOM-y. Do you agree with that cliché?

In post 780, bubbajack8 wrote: VOTE: Sakura

Eh. Have you played with Sakura before?

In post 798, Neonizer wrote:So maybe you are saying stuff in your head and thinking you've explained it.

That's what I have been thinking. The passion is there though with his attacks, they just aren't...organized

In post 788, Ms Marangal wrote:

In post 732, Marquis wrote:Mara if you're town you should be able to read the meta here and if you're scum then here's your chance to bus for towncred.

this is shitty, and a really weird appeal

VOTE: Marquis

Con Mafia Marquis who you townread correctly and won a sigbet through (NACHO WAS THE LOSER HA *don't tell him I said that and look at his avatar *) vs. Open 534 Marquis

Discuss!

In post 797, BoroPhil wrote:not sure what Dry's game is, and whilst I think I admitted I was a bit surprised by the deadline arrival, I actually tried to get a lynch on someone I wasn't convinced on (notscience) to try and stop a no lynch. So, your vote is frankly baffling.

Whatever. I was thinking of Neonizer. Doesn't change the fact that you're scum.

I'm pretty sure Marquis is getting lynched today, so my vote on you is just to show where my suspicions lie.

don't worry, I won't take that personally. I'll keep you right.

start - isn't most things in this game WIFOM-y? Are you suggesting we just act as if the NK didn't happen?

In post 618, BoroPhil wrote:Mario is just an easy vote. No way of knowing whatsoever if he is scum/town. but I do imagine scum would be keen to get on it.

In post 619, BoroPhil wrote:and of the people on it, I'd say neonizer is the most likely scum. there is time for a counter wagon.

UNVOTE:
VOTE: neonizer

Hahahaha phil no. I didnt miss out 618 that's what I meant when I said your closest is explanation is most likely scum. That's not an explanation as to why out of all those people on that easy vote I am most likely scum. So you are calling me lazy. While you still haven't actually come up for a reason why I am scum. You've come up with a theory of a group if people contains scum and I am most likely.

VOTE: borophil

In post 802, notscience wrote:VOTE: Mario4

Nice vote and reasoning there chief

In post 804, startfromtheheart wrote:

In post 773, BoroPhil wrote:does anyone want to think about why SoS was the target? That is good information we have to use. Was it because they were obviously town? Or on to something? Or a double-bluff? Thoughts, please.

There seems to be a cliché that Night kill analysis is WIFOM-y. Do you agree with that cliché?

In post 780, bubbajack8 wrote: VOTE: Sakura

Eh. Have you played with Sakura before?

She replaced out of a game I was in.

Why everytime someone thinks I'm scum, someone that has played plenty of times with me says the exact same thing.

Can you find another game we played in?

In post 812, bubbajack8 wrote:Can you find another game we played in?

My previous post was wrt Bert's question. It's seriously getting old and apparently im obvtown every game without even trying.

Sak you are easy to get

In post 814, Neonizer wrote:Sak you are easy to get

What does that even mean.

when scum you are obvious on day 3

In post 808, Neonizer wrote:

In post 618, BoroPhil wrote:Mario is just an easy vote. No way of knowing whatsoever if he is scum/town. but I do imagine scum would be keen to get on it.

In post 619, BoroPhil wrote:and of the people on it, I'd say neonizer is the most likely scum. there is time for a counter wagon.

UNVOTE:
VOTE: neonizer

Hahahaha phil no. I didnt miss out 618 that's what I meant when I said your closest is explanation is most likely scum. That's not an explanation as to why out of all those people on that easy vote I am most likely scum. So you are calling me lazy. While you still haven't actually come up for a reason why I am scum. You've come up with a theory of a group if people contains scum and I am most likely.

VOTE: borophil

being on that vote is good enough reason for me. you are trying and failing to turn this into a battle of semantics which is classic scum misrepping behaviour. thanks though for reassuring me that my vote is in the right place.

btw neo, you never answered start's admittedly useful question at 751.

notscience, you are very quiet today considering you were the main player yesterday along with SoS and almost got lynched. why mario?

Hahahaha misrepping. I am asking you give an explanation of me being scum. Yes being on that vote may be good enough reason for me. But you must have a reason why I over the others is more viable. Or are your partners a part of that group?

All you are doing is attaching yourself to me.

You are playing to your scum meta and I like it

and this scum meta is? Please enlighten us.

In post 538, Neonizer wrote:

In post 536, BoroPhil wrote:well wtf happened here

Quoting someone who smells werewolfy.

Loads of pages not enouhg substance.

Don't like mara atm which is weird to say

I like ETLs replace out because before that I have sneaky suspicion him and NS were scum.

Now I think Hi two townies.

and I think this was the reason you seemed the scummiest of those on that particular wagon. It was a bizarre post which you never fully explained.

What on earth did the 4th and 5th lines mean?

and here are the people on that wagon (in reverse order unfortunately)

In post 604, Sakura Hana wrote:

In post 602, Sound of Silence wrote:There was a deadline? O.o
>Totally forgot that deadline exists

For some reason I totally forgot about the deadline as well

Don't think Im gonna get any more reactions out of my vote on Bert so...

Unvote
Vote: Mario

In post 601, Dry-fit wrote:Would have preferred Marquis or Boro though.

This is interesting I thought you'd have preferred me considering how much you had been questioning me on my sheeping.

In post 601, Dry-fit wrote:Well Mario is pretty much the ideal compromise deadline lynch. Would have preferred Marquis or Boro though.

Unvote.
Vote: Mario4.

Marcrell wrote:I don't have a serious suspicion. I'll
UNVOTE: Dry-Fit
But I'm still working on developing reads and the fact that I am rather limited on time right now is keeping me from rereading and doing it right now.

We're in deadline lynch mode here. It's not about making cases at this point but choosing the lynch of those that are possible that you prefer. In this case I don't know if there are any feasible lynches besides Mario. Maybe Marquis.

I also want to remind everyone at this point that BROseidon requires votes to be on their own line. Everyone's vote needs to be counting right now.

In post 600, Sound of Silence wrote:

UNVOTE

VOTE: Mario4

In post 595, Neonizer wrote:BAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA

go nacho

VOTE: mario4

cos I love nacho and he loves me

In post 585, Nachomamma8 wrote:

Vote: Mario4

omfg this read is gold gold gold

you talk about people attaching themselves, but what exactly are you doing here? it's such blatant bandwagoning it's untrue.

and if my buddies are on this wagon, who would you be referring to?

hi there i could have easily jumped on the mario wagon as an easy and the biggest alternative to mine but i didn't because i'm town ok bye

boro > neo in terms of towniness rn btw

UNVOTE:

reminding myself why i townread mario initially despite that one bad post smh nacho and your mind control