Posted: Thu Dec 05, 2013 8:20 am
I mean people tend to townread big walls.
Page 33 of 145
Posted: Thu Dec 05, 2013 8:21 am
You joke about it but it's totally something that happens.
Posted: Thu Dec 05, 2013 8:23 am
Yeah, I know, I did it. I've done it. But I never actuallyIn post 801, Nachomamma8 wrote:You joke about it but it's totally something that happens.
read
them when my scumreads do them. Wisdom liked it because of the content. I liked it because it happened.Posted: Thu Dec 05, 2013 8:24 am
Also, you're just offering him an out right now
Posted: Thu Dec 05, 2013 8:26 am
@wisdom, it's okay, I can scumhunt more than one person at a time 
you just got me too focused on you with our superlong 1v1.
if you link me to a game where I can see that, preferably where whiskers was participating, that might help me reconsider you(and make my whiskers read stronger).
till then, well, I'm kinda sold for the weekend.
@Nacho:
re:wagons - because that implies that he dosen't care which lynch goes through, as long as one does. should he flip scum, those he voted automatically get townpoints.
re:his way of scumhunting - I'll see that when he provides a link.
re:style -we'll see. re:calling the entire scumteam - never on minis. at best, 9p micros, at worst, <9p. re:early townreads: matt. possibly moar, don't remember.
re:style = lol third time same post xD
re:buddying - because it assumes too much based on too little, and that's practically gambling, which is not pro-town.
I'm off to shower and to
good night fellas. posting that wall really got me tired.
pedit: will respond tomorrow.
you just got me too focused on you with our superlong 1v1.if you link me to a game where I can see that, preferably where whiskers was participating, that might help me reconsider you(and make my whiskers read stronger).
till then, well, I'm kinda sold for the weekend.
@Nacho:
re:wagons - because that implies that he dosen't care which lynch goes through, as long as one does. should he flip scum, those he voted automatically get townpoints.
re:his way of scumhunting - I'll see that when he provides a link.
re:style -we'll see. re:calling the entire scumteam - never on minis. at best, 9p micros, at worst, <9p. re:early townreads: matt. possibly moar, don't remember.
re:style = lol third time same post xD
re:buddying - because it assumes too much based on too little, and that's practically gambling, which is not pro-town.
I'm off to shower and to
my girlfriend
GG lol.good night fellas. posting that wall really got me tired.
pedit: will respond tomorrow.
Posted: Thu Dec 05, 2013 8:29 am
I have not played with Whiskers before. Like you, he was annoyed by my playstyle for the same reason; he doesn't know me.
Chain of Command
Probably the best example, but if you pick almost any towngame from my wiki you'll still find it.
Chain of Command
Probably the best example, but if you pick almost any towngame from my wiki you'll still find it.
Posted: Thu Dec 05, 2013 8:29 am
wisdom why are you ignoring matt?
Posted: Thu Dec 05, 2013 8:30 am
mason buddy going paranoid on you is the type of thing that seems pretty worthy of a response.
Posted: Thu Dec 05, 2013 8:31 am
Upon ISO'ing mollie:In post 539, Nachomamma8 wrote:What do you think of her push on Whiskers?In post 535, Grimgroove wrote:mollie feels too nice and too fluffy. Either she's ovulating or she's scum.
Too emotional to sheep, but genuine enough not to scumread her for it.
I prefer her push on Whiskers over yours on shos actually.
Posted: Thu Dec 05, 2013 8:31 am
Yeah, I'm frankly shocked it's gone so long without a response. If I were Wisdom in this situation I would have IMMEDIATELY responded and done serious damage control
Posted: Thu Dec 05, 2013 8:32 am
Do you think shos is town?In post 808, Grimgroove wrote:I prefer her push on Whiskers over yours on shos actually.
Posted: Thu Dec 05, 2013 8:34 am
What's this? A scummy snipe?In post 797, Nachomamma8 wrote:not even a little bit surprised.In post 791, Grimgroove wrote:I also liked shos' last wall. Minus the girlfriend-bit (:mad: Who is she?)
Expand on this please. Why were you not surprised?
Posted: Thu Dec 05, 2013 8:36 am
Actually, can we talk about your read on shos? You were reading him as scummy (initially), then townie (no reason for switch), then scummy because he said he loved you in all caps (what? this was the entire basis for the read on him when you ISOed him. one sentence, all caps is your entire read on SHOS, which is pretty fucking horrible), and now town because wall. Why did you like his wall?
Posted: Thu Dec 05, 2013 8:36 am
I don't know what you want a response to, Matt.
Posted: Thu Dec 05, 2013 8:37 am
In post 799, MattP wrote:In post 788, MattP wrote:yeah thats what really set me off, especially because I knew my reason was silly and he buddied right away. I just think it's very statistically crazy that he would just so happen to townread you for legit reason the moment I did for a completely different, silly reason
Posted: Thu Dec 05, 2013 8:37 am
That's disappointing.In post 813, Wisdom wrote:I don't know what you want a response to, Matt.
Posted: Thu Dec 05, 2013 8:38 am
In post 810, Nachomamma8 wrote:Do you think shos is town?In post 808, Grimgroove wrote:I prefer her push on Whiskers over yours on shos actually.
I think my read on shos right now is pretty obvious without having to ask this question. I liked his wall and said I did. Have you ever seen an instance where a likeable wall did not result in a townread?
Posted: Thu Dec 05, 2013 8:39 am
Didn't surprise me because a couple of people said they liked shos because wall and your shos read seems to follow general consensus pretty consistently.In post 811, Grimgroove wrote:What's this? A scummy snipe?In post 797, Nachomamma8 wrote:not even a little bit surprised.In post 791, Grimgroove wrote:I also liked shos' last wall. Minus the girlfriend-bit (:mad: Who is she?
Expand on this please. Why were you not surprised?
Posted: Thu Dec 05, 2013 8:43 am
Wisdom?
Posted: Thu Dec 05, 2013 8:43 am
?
Posted: Thu Dec 05, 2013 8:44 am
Why did you like shos's wall?
Posted: Thu Dec 05, 2013 8:46 am
And why do you have no response to MattP's townread on you dying a very very quick death?
Especially when you just got done saying things like this:
Especially when you just got done saying things like this:
In post 794, Wisdom wrote:Now this game has lots of people who know me, so you won't be getting any support. Maybe one or two will get paranoid for a while, but that's it. So your choices are either to accept that you are wrong and I am town, and move on to actually scumhunt instead of whining about how you don't like my play, or keep whining and getting scumread in the process.
Posted: Thu Dec 05, 2013 8:47 am
Because this sort of scumread on me comes from people who don't know me and think that my antitown playstyle equals scum. I explained that already.
pedit: Because I won't defend a townread on me. I don't care. Matt is smart enough to snap out of his little paranoia.
pedit: Because I won't defend a townread on me. I don't care. Matt is smart enough to snap out of his little paranoia.
Posted: Thu Dec 05, 2013 8:48 am
I know, I was hoping you'd go a little more in depth. Attacking antitown things is also one of the easiest things you can possibly do as scum and I think shos knows better.In post 822, Wisdom wrote:Because this sort of scumread on me comes from people who don't know me and think that my antitown playstyle equals scum. I explained that already.
What?In post 822, Wisdom wrote:Because I won't defend a townread on me.
Posted: Thu Dec 05, 2013 8:50 am
Nachomamma has been whiteknighting Malakittens.
Discuss.
Nachomamma has been the most subtle in trying to move votes to the shos wagon.
Discuss.
VOTE: Nachomamma
Discuss.
@Nachomamma: I liked shos' wall because everything in it made sense.
Why are you acting surprised about people liking it?
Discuss.
Nachomamma has been the most subtle in trying to move votes to the shos wagon.
Discuss.
VOTE: Nachomamma
Discuss.
@Nachomamma: I liked shos' wall because everything in it made sense.
Why are you acting surprised about people liking it?