Posted: Fri Jan 31, 2014 4:24 am
Let's not harass poor Flandre just yet.
I was waiting to see which one of you two gave me a scum read(if either?), and you just came knocking on my doorstepIn post 798, Venmar wrote:I was trying to find out which one of you two was likely to be scum (if either?), you just made it easy for me.In post 764, Metal Sonic wrote:And your first votes were on both your neighbors? Why happened to love thy neighbor? Apparently you don't have the generous spirit, so I'm being proactive in kicking you out.
I agree with this statementIn post 805, Angry Frat BROs wrote:Oh right, zMuffin is still hillariously scum. Anyone want to quicklynch that?
Is it a coincidence that you admit this only after two people call you scummy for it?In post 806, Metal Sonic wrote:Honestly I have no case on Venmar except lots of OMGUS
Admitting that right now >.>
Mind telling me about pie for a sec? I'm not very good at reading him, and I don't see how the supposed RQ makes him town.In post 744, sangres wrote:goddamnit.
Ok. moving you to leaning town.
but I think you're wrong about pieguyn.
Hm. Am I not taking this as seriously as I should be? Because I'm not feeling scummy intent behind Skull's questioning of Orci.In post 752, Aegor wrote:Anyway, I was going to post that I really hope this moronic rolefishing discussion is over. @Skull: Claiming any sort of negative utility passive role (Hated, Miller, etc.) is standard. This permits the town to decide whether a policy lynch would be appropriate and simply makes the town aware of critical info. You pushed for MORE information than was provided. We were told that Orc is hated. That is all. You were fishing for more info about the role, when Orc told us only what we needed to know. He made the right play; you rolefished needlessly. If Orc had actually told us everything about his role, there would have been no need for you to ask any questions about it. The fact that answers to your questions would have required that more information be provided by definition means you were rolefishing.
Hi, Varsoon. Feeling better?In post 757, Varsoon wrote:Man, I'm glad that I don't matter.
Wish I could emulate this in my scum-games.
Wow. I feel a really defensive OMGUSy tone coming from you. Awkward.In post 760, Metal Sonic wrote:Clearly Venmar likes bullshitting his neighborhoods. These are his first four posts in ISO. Obviously not random votes.
A step above Moonlogic.
Better than nothing, though. When you have to drive a nail, do you use your fists in place of a brick because it's no substitute for a proper hammer?In post 773, mastin2 wrote:Two factors, basically. First being laziness, the second being that I question the usefulness of doing so in the first place--second-hand meta is no substitute for first-hand experience.
Why would scum fakeclaim a role expected to die before endgame?In post 773, mastin2 wrote:(*No, not really a scum bodyguard, as interesting a role as that'd be. Pie is likely scum fakeclaiming bodyguard.)
Everything in this game is saying otherwise.In post 811, Varsoon wrote:I think we should focus on other players, he's too easy a wagon for scum to be on regardless of his alignment.
Could you maybe do something a little more substantial than proclaim alignments in one-liner posts?In post 787, Angry Frat BROs wrote:Ffery. stop being useless. Its making you hard to read.
This is our first game together, right?In post 819, Aegor wrote:Both mastin and muffin get added to my desired-vig list. I think mastin is scummier than zmuffin, which surprised me when I re-read. The attitude present in his earlier posts (before he started making unfounded assertions about alignment) in particular gave me good vibes. None of mastin's posts have been helpful in any way, nor is there any clear scumhunting intent behind them.
That MafiaSSK has managed to lurk this much is distressing. I am awaiting a kick-ass post after the prod.
Kaze's posts were really bad upon re-read. We are treated to walls like 262 and 363, which have tons of fluff and specious questions ("Why are you self-voting, Brian?"). None of the questions -- even the decent ones -- appear to lead to concrete reads or cases; the answers provided almost seem irrelevant to anything Kaze posts next. Then we have 298, which correctly calls mastin out, then a series of superficially townish yet insubstantial and useless rhetorical questions wavering. Hammy and forced, especially given the succinct nature of most of his other posts. Voting record is also spotty -- early Brian vote is fine, but then he votes mastin. Then he switches to pie with this terrible and useless post. No real explanation. I have no problem with wagon-hopping, but town players at least accompany or justify it with some sort of information acquisition from those wagons. That really has not happened, and Kaze has not scumhunted anywhere else either.
VOTE: Kaze
Because there was zero trajectory on the vote.In post 235, MafiaSSK wrote:Aegor, why do you have zero trajectory on that Kaze vote.