I agree lynching Kitoari is stupid. Which is why I'm not voting him. But if he were to disappear, I would not be disappointed.
I'm having doubts about anti. I think Shroom might be a shiny scapegoat but I'm not sure yet.
ah yes, sorry i forgot about this. Since anti and SSK were both on the Shroomish wagon with me and Ika its really unlikely that both are scum. From what Ika has told me, Anti is known to bus, so if Shroomish flips scum I'd go for town SSK and scum Anti. Additionally, since SSK is sheeping its less likely he'd sheep onto a fellow scum then to have Anti bus.
1) Haven looked at recent vote count.In post 800, Snork wrote:1)Iamvoting SSK, ika...
I agree lynching Kitoari is stupid. Which is why I'm not voting him. But if he were to disappear, I would not be disappointed.
2) I'm having doubts about anti. I think Shroom might be a shiny scapegoat but I'm not sure yet.
I dont think i recall me saying anti busses? Maybe it was titus and her scum how she DOESNT bus and instead distances best as possible.In post 801, Dr Pants wrote:ah yes, sorry i forgot about this. Since anti and SSK were both on the Shroomish wagon with me and Ika its really unlikely that both are scum. From what Ika has told me, Anti is known to bus, so if Shroomish flips scum I'd go for town SSK and scum Anti. Additionally, since SSK is sheeping its less likely he'd sheep onto a fellow scum then to have Anti bus.
1) Haven looked at recent vote count.In post 800, Snork wrote:1)Iamvoting SSK, ika...
I agree lynching Kitoari is stupid. Which is why I'm not voting him. But if he were to disappear, I would not be disappointed.
2) I'm having doubts about anti. I think Shroom might be a shiny scapegoat but I'm not sure yet.
I dont think i recall me saying anti busses? Maybe it was titus and her scum how she DOESNT bus and instead distances best as possible.In post 801, Dr Pants wrote:ah yes, sorry i forgot about this. Since anti and SSK were both on the Shroomish wagon with me and Ika its really unlikely that both are scum. From what Ika has told me, Anti is known to bus, so if Shroomish flips scum I'd go for town SSK and scum Anti. Additionally, since SSK is sheeping its less likely he'd sheep onto a fellow scum then to have Anti bus.
because i give up on this game.In post 795, Snork wrote:Anti I'd actually like to hear your reasoning for claiming when and how you did. Can you explain please?
lolwat?In post 801, Dr Pants wrote:ah yes, sorry i forgot about this. Since anti and SSK were both on the Shroomish wagon with me and Ika its really unlikely that both are scum. From what Ika has told me, Anti is known to bus, so if Shroomish flips scum I'd go for town SSK and scum Anti. Additionally, since SSK is sheeping its less likely he'd sheep onto a fellow scum then to have Anti bus.
This is what I was thinking of, but its not as strong as "Anit busses", so I guess scrap that part of the argument. It doesn't change the reads thoughIn post 630, ika wrote:IMO, yes i could see anti trying to do that overall some of his "SSK is being SSK but snork is not" (or someone he mentioned) is what makes me think SSK is town is anti is scum. This is also why I want to see where this leads to. I'm willing to move over to anti before day is over (we have 6 days), i just want to see how far anti is going to push thisIn post 627, Dr Pants wrote:would anti bus HS though?
im going back and forth on titus and anti. personally i think the best thing right now might be to get that sorted out today or tomorrow. if shroomish does flip scum, then we would have to wonder whether or not anti would be willing to bus someone out when their are other easy targets (like myself) in play.
this contridcits what you said to me about your claim eariler....In post 804, Antihero wrote:because i give up on this game.In post 795, Snork wrote:Anti I'd actually like to hear your reasoning for claiming when and how you did. Can you explain please?
i knew the claim would either get me lynched or nightkilled tonight.
here FMPOV it sounds like you claimed out of just sheer anger and maybe being tiredIn post 683, Antihero wrote:well, i claimed at around 5:00 this morning and most playersIn post 678, Dr Pants wrote:Something else that's telling: given how much you v Titus there has been today, why hasn't a wagon formed before now? and now that a wagon has formed, why isn't scum jumping at the chance to get you, who claimed a town PR, out?SIMPLY HAVEN'T FUCKING BEEN ON
your fail logic is more telling than anything
...that's contradictory.... how?also, i'm just over this game.
though.
done.
that's why i claimed.
...exactly... the point of the claim was to commit suicide.........In post 808, ika wrote:here FMPOV it sounds like you claimed out of just sheer anger and maybe being tired
in terms of whose votes would deter me, it would be burning earth and shroomish (but burning earth has been revving the chainsaws for shroomish for a while now, so....)In post 804, Antihero wrote:townreads would include Snork. leaning town on bubbajack and goodmorning (though, i think someone should check one or both of these out). SSK is... well... SSK. scumreads are burningearth and shroomish.
I did explain. I'm not interested in continuing a conversation with you if you aren't interested in backing up your opinion with evidence.In post 788, Snork wrote:Supporting evidence in the thread.........
Were you referring to someone's VCA in particular? I didn't see any. But if you think it sucks you should explain why. VCA by itself, as a method, doesn't suck...
Meh, i do what i can with what info i got, it may not always be optimal but it is what it is.In post 814, goodmorning wrote:I did explain. I'm not interested in continuing a conversation with you if you aren't interested in backing up your opinion with evidence.In post 788, Snork wrote:Supporting evidence in the thread.........
Were you referring to someone's VCA in particular? I didn't see any. But if you think it sucks you should explain why. VCA by itself, as a method, doesn't suck...
I wasn't, though if you want to go there ika's was particularly awful.
Intresting...In post 818, Antihero wrote:knowing SC, me you and Pants are very likely the only non-vanillas in this game
ok.In post 816, ika wrote:Anti: the thing is im looking at it from other perspectives as well The fact you are saying "titus vs you cant be TvS" is fallacy is not really unless if you know titus is town or you are both scums.
Is it possible for you to both be town? yes
is it possible for one of you to be scum? yes
this is why me and pants are trying to solve it and your basic defeatism is not helping. If anything its a basic attempt at ATE, yes it could technacly be your playstlye that casued all this. But at same time we have to take other views (like flips and wagons and several other things that im taking into consideration).
Anti: the thing is im looking at it from other perspectives as well The fact you are saying "titus vs you cant be TvS" is fallacy is not really unless if you know titus is town or you are both scums.Is it possible for you to both be town? yesis it possible for one of you to be scum? yesthis is why me and pants are trying to solve it and your basic defeatism is not helping. If anything its a basic attempt at ATE, yes it could technacly be your playstlye that casued all this. But at same time we have to take other views (like flips and wagons and several other things that im taking into consideration).
mmmmmmmmIn post 820, Dr Pants wrote:we've only had 1 night. its possible that there is a third party (probably a SK) and that scum has a doc. or, town has a doc and scum has a strongman. or, perhaps scum has a role cop. there's a lot of different things it could be.
Thats why im waiting on sevral thingsIn post 820, Dr Pants wrote:
If RB is scum, then there probably aren't other scum PR's, but there has to be other town PR's, since RB against masons is meaningless.
Then its an agree to disagree overall.In post 821, Antihero wrote:
ok.
prime example of what i'm talking about in terms of playstyle difference.
i don't look at fights and then label them TvT or TvS. with the exception of special circumstances (white flag and other situations where it's obviously not strategically sound for scum to bus), ineverdo that.
the reason is because you can't really tell just from how the fight's going if it's TvT or TvS.especiallyif the fight gets heated. really the best indicator in that those scenarios is to read what's going onaroundthe fight (how are other people reacting? are they trying to fuel the flames? how are the two adversaries readingeveryone elsein the game?)
i read the players as individuals and with respect to players who have already flipped. flippantly declaring a scuffle to be "TvT" or "TvS" is counterproductive and (in my opinion) kind of scummy.
In post 822, Antihero wrote:mmmmmmmmIn post 820, Dr Pants wrote:we've only had 1 night. its possible that there is a third party (probably a SK) and that scum has a doc. or, town has a doc and scum has a strongman. or, perhaps scum has a role cop. there's a lot of different things it could be.
i've played SC games and i think he tries to keep them as close to mountainous as possible.
i kind of don't he would use target-side counters.