Page 33 of 37
Posted: Sat Sep 15, 2007 4:53 am
by Aimee
JordanA24 wrote:Confused to claim?
(Though he hasn't posted in-game, or indeed on-site, for 5 days)
She said she would have some limited access.
Posted: Sat Sep 15, 2007 1:58 pm
by Dusk
Does anybody want to tell me I'm guilty, again?
Posted: Sat Sep 15, 2007 2:08 pm
by Dusk
If not I'm going to get this ball rolling and
Vote: Albert
Our RB can block whoever he feels is guilty in the Night. There is probably just one Mafia member left. By process of elimination (trusting Aimee and Jordan to be power pro-town roles, Skruff being cleared, knowing I'm innocent, going with Albert's confession) the last Vok must be Confused. I liked Confused though. It was Primoris who was so suspicious with his bandwagoning of ryan despite saying he liked Ryan and thought ryan was innocent prior to the bandwagon (84). Thus, there being no one else to vote for, I really have no argument for lynching her. So I'd rather go with the obvious choice toDay, lynch Confused once she comes back the next Day, and we block a kill toNight hopefully.
Posted: Sat Sep 15, 2007 10:23 pm
by JordanA24
I'd be fine with lynching Albert, and I RB one of Dusk and Confused and Aimee investigates the other. But only after Confused claims, I think Aimee should investigate who we decide to be most suspicious of Dusk/Confused.
Posted: Sun Sep 16, 2007 3:12 am
by Albert B. Rampage
Its Dusk, obviously.
Posted: Sun Sep 16, 2007 3:17 am
by JordanA24
EDWOP: If Albert is SK, I RB the most suspicious, if Albert is not SK, well, it doesn't matter who gets investigated/RBed out of Dusk/Confused as long as everyone else is telling the truth about their role.
Posted: Sun Sep 16, 2007 3:46 am
by Skruffs
Actually, jordan, you should block the most likely scum, and aimee should investigate the other. We want aimee to be alive tomorrow, to confirm her result, and so we want to keep the most likely scum from killing.
Posted: Sun Sep 16, 2007 6:20 am
by Albert B. Rampage
The end...is this what it looks like ?
Posted: Sun Sep 16, 2007 2:21 pm
by Skruffs
Definitely both power roles should claim who they are targetting to ensure total success.
Posted: Sun Sep 16, 2007 2:22 pm
by Albert B. Rampage
I'm not the SK, btw. Woulda been cool, though.
Posted: Mon Sep 17, 2007 5:18 am
by JordanA24
So you're a jester?
Posted: Mon Sep 17, 2007 6:11 am
by Albert B. Rampage
No...vanilla.
Posted: Mon Sep 17, 2007 6:52 am
by JordanA24
Then why claim SK for no good reason?
Posted: Mon Sep 17, 2007 6:59 am
by Albert B. Rampage
I wanted to draw the real one out. Didn't work.
Posted: Mon Sep 17, 2007 7:14 am
by JordanA24
Why would the real SK claim?
Posted: Mon Sep 17, 2007 7:18 am
by Lowell
My mason buddy voted =confused= before he died. So that's good enough for me. He's one of the three choices we have left.
vote =confused=
. Why not.
Posted: Mon Sep 17, 2007 9:54 am
by Skruffs
Whatsucks is that lowell isn't cleared.
Posted: Mon Sep 17, 2007 9:56 am
by JordanA24
Has anyone counterclaimed mason?
Posted: Mon Sep 17, 2007 10:17 am
by Dusk
I'm sorry. Albert has recently been yelling that it's so obvious that I'm scum.
But Albert you claimed SK to draw out the real SK? I find this hard to believe. The real SK wouldn't come forward because you claim it. IF you weren't the Sk and you did such a thing the town would mistakenly lynch you and the Sk would be safe another day.
Are you being purposely stupid?
Posted: Mon Sep 17, 2007 2:34 pm
by Albert B. Rampage
I am willing to give myself up for the cause. Even if I'm lynched, there's only two other players of unknown alignment and I'll win anyway...I guess its my way of being overconfident.
Posted: Mon Sep 17, 2007 9:55 pm
by Aimee
I say we lynch either Albert or Dusk.
Posted: Tue Sep 18, 2007 5:11 am
by Lowell
Wait, you seriously doubt I'm the mason?
Dear god, people, look at ALL the posts from STD and I.
Who brought that up, anyway. I should lynch you.
Posted: Tue Sep 18, 2007 5:13 am
by Lowell
Also, you're suggesting the REAL mason is just sitting back.... so that... what, exactly?
I don't even know how to begin to tell you how dumb that is.
Posted: Tue Sep 18, 2007 12:09 pm
by Skruffs
No, I'm suggestign that it sucks that neither you or STD breadcrumbed that your aprtner's innocence was guaranteed. I'm not doubting your masonismness, merely your alignment. But I am not going to check it out until other avenues are checked out, first.
Posted: Wed Sep 19, 2007 5:54 am
by Skruffs