Page 33 of 96
Posted: Sun Aug 31, 2014 7:03 am
by MattP
Csareo, nothing you're saying even forwards the conversation, you're just sitting on the sidelines and saying asides. The reason we're discussing is to not be two idiotic rival blocs, and you coming in and forwarding that mentality is anti-town and scummy, or unintelligent at best
Posted: Sun Aug 31, 2014 7:03 am
by MattP
Unless you seriously believe that on Day 1 of the game all of the scum would create a bloc and vote and speak together, which would never happen ever
Posted: Sun Aug 31, 2014 7:04 am
by Csareo
↑ MattP wrote: ↑ Csareo wrote:And the two blocs form. I am confident in my vezok lynch, but am being open minded here. I see these opposing fronts coming into action, and I really want to break one of them apart.
One of these blocs has several scum reads, so can we start there??
Can you literally just close down your browser and walk away
Okay, now here is why I keep scum reading you.
Hostility is the first maxim of a scum player.
When thou can not debunk, insult
Posted: Sun Aug 31, 2014 7:06 am
by Csareo
Mattp, what is wrong with my post? Nothing I said is controversial.
Legitimacy sniping is anti-town.
Posted: Sun Aug 31, 2014 7:06 am
by xRECKONERx
↑ MattP wrote:Ok, the only thing that seems bizarre is that you were intellectually able to observe Myko's content and praise it for being thoughtful and articulate but simultaneously did not realize that the content wasn't at all geared towards a case on me
I usually play while at work. Phonecalls, e-mails, people walking in my office, etc often interrupt my flow of thought. I remembered liking his content. The name associated with that case in my head was "Matt", so when I typed it up and wanted to respond to the
content
of the case, I just said I didn't want to lynch Matt because I thought that was who the case was on.
I wish I could explain it more. I didn't quote the case and was responding in a reply screen so I didn't have it in front of me. I also don't think, as bizarre as it may be (and as much as me trying to get everyone to understand how my severely damaged brain works seems confusing), it's at all alignment indicative. Like, there's no way to construe this as anything other than a fuck up, and fuck ups are inherently null (unless it's a scum slip, which this was not).
Posted: Sun Aug 31, 2014 7:06 am
by Csareo
Mattp, what is wrong with my post? Nothing I said is controversial.
Legitimacy sniping is anti-town.
Posted: Sun Aug 31, 2014 7:06 am
by xRECKONERx
↑ Csareo wrote:Hostility is the first maxim of a scum player.
Hostility is the first maxim of someone who is too old for this bullshit.
Posted: Sun Aug 31, 2014 7:07 am
by MattP
↑ Csareo wrote:Okay, now here is why I keep scum reading you.
Hostility is the first maxim of a scum player.
When thou can not debunk, insult
Let's get this straight, farside is antagonizing my current reads in the game and I've not insulted her (besides her syntax because sometimes I literally cannot understand what she's saying)
You're the ONLY person I'm antagonizing because you're like a little yappie dog that isn't contributing anything useful to the conversation
Posted: Sun Aug 31, 2014 7:08 am
by Csareo
↑ MattP wrote:Unless you seriously believe that on Day 1 of the game all of the scum would create a bloc and vote and speak together, which would never happen ever
Blocs form day one. It has happened every time throughout mafia history.
I never said the other bloc was solely scum either, as their are 4 people on it.
Posted: Sun Aug 31, 2014 7:09 am
by Csareo
Why antagonize at all? Hostility is scummy, get that straight.
Posted: Sun Aug 31, 2014 7:09 am
by MattP
↑ Csareo wrote: ↑ MattP wrote:Unless you seriously believe that on Day 1 of the game all of the scum would create a bloc and vote and speak together, which would never happen ever
Blocs form day one.
It has happened every time throughout mafia history.
I never said the other bloc was solely scum either, as their are 4 people on it.
That's not true at all. And even if you believed it was true, it doesn't mean we should be ok with them considering you seem to think some people in each bloc are town and therefore are probably being manipulated by scum and we should put everyone on the right track??
Posted: Sun Aug 31, 2014 7:10 am
by Csareo
You strawmanned me saying "scum bloc". There are two blocs. Not an opinion, but a fact.
Posted: Sun Aug 31, 2014 7:11 am
by Csareo
Acting like a dick,makes you a dick.
Good day dick.
Posted: Sun Aug 31, 2014 7:12 am
by MattP
↑ Csareo wrote:You strawmanned me saying "scum bloc". There are two blocs. Not an opinion, but a fact.
You said that vezok, reck, and probably me are scum. You think you and farside is town. Those are the loudest people on each bloc. You clearly believe that the major proponent of one bloc is the entire scumteam. Am I missing something here?
Posted: Sun Aug 31, 2014 7:13 am
by Csareo
You are not attacking farside, because she has earned legitimacy for herself. If you are hostile to her, it will backfire (assuring you're scum)
I am looked at as a noob player. A scum player see's that, and will continue to make baseless, and over exaggerated insults to destroy any credibility that noob player has.
Smart townies would see that.
Posted: Sun Aug 31, 2014 7:13 am
by Csareo
↑ MattP wrote: ↑ Csareo wrote:You strawmanned me saying "scum bloc". There are two blocs. Not an opinion, but a fact.
You said that vezok, reck, and probably me are scum. You think you and farside is town. Those are the loudest people on each bloc. You clearly believe that the major proponent of one bloc is the entire scumteam. Am I missing something here?
Another straw man. I scum read you. That does not mean any of you are scum.
Please read before you start spewing this garbage at me.
Posted: Sun Aug 31, 2014 7:14 am
by Csareo
Now calm the fuck down and stop getting so over excited about a two sentence post.
Posted: Sun Aug 31, 2014 7:14 am
by T S O
Csareo could not possibly be this bad and antagonistic as scum.
Posted: Sun Aug 31, 2014 7:14 am
by MattP
↑ Csareo wrote:You are not attacking farside, because she has earned legitimacy for herself. If you are hostile to her, it will backfire (assuring you're scum)
I am looked at as a noob player. A scum player see's that, and will continue to make baseless, and over exaggerated insults to destroy any credibility that noob player has.
Smart townies would see that.
Funny, because Vezok and Reck are attacking farside and the only people it's "backfired" with are you and farside. So that's not true.
You are looked at as a noob player because of your actions. Ego buffering etc etc
Posted: Sun Aug 31, 2014 7:16 am
by Csareo
I haven't played bad, because I haven't had a chance to play yet.
Half my posts have been prod dodges, as I try to reread this game again and again.
Posted: Sun Aug 31, 2014 7:16 am
by MattP
↑ Csareo wrote:That does not mean any of you are scum.
That doesn't at all change my argument?
Posted: Sun Aug 31, 2014 7:16 am
by Csareo
↑ MattP wrote: ↑ Csareo wrote:You are not attacking farside, because she has earned legitimacy for herself. If you are hostile to her, it will backfire (assuring you're scum)
I am looked at as a noob player. A scum player see's that, and will continue to make baseless, and over exaggerated insults to destroy any credibility that noob player has.
Smart townies would see that.
Funny, because Vezok and Reck are attacking farside and the only people it's "backfired" with are you and farside. So that's not true.
You are looked at as a noob player because of your actions. Ego buffering etc etc
How did it backfire?
Posted: Sun Aug 31, 2014 7:17 am
by T S O
You posting is anti-town, Csareo, though, so maybe 2 posts/day.
Posted: Sun Aug 31, 2014 7:17 am
by Csareo
↑ MattP wrote: ↑ Csareo wrote:That does not mean any of you are scum.
That doesn't at all change my argument?
You made a straw man that the other bloc was scum.
Your argument was based on a false premise.
Posted: Sun Aug 31, 2014 7:17 am
by xRECKONERx
↑ Csareo wrote:Another straw man. I scum read you. That does not mean any of you are scum.