Mafiascum.net

↑ Aronis wrote:Correct me if I'm wrong.

I wasn't scum bc nobody was providing a legit case about me. You're doing the exact same thing now?

What are your reads Aronis?

↑ Aronis wrote:Correct me if I'm wrong.

I wasn't scum bc nobody was providing a legit case about me. You're doing the exact same thing now?

I already provided a legit case about PB day 1, day 2 he replaces out and the replacement is doing the exact same thing PLUS, PLUS the replacement had to iso themselves which is a big no no. PLUS, you're just going to have to trust me. Or not, your loss.

I suggest you try and read better before accusing me of not having reasons or making a case.

Beck, can I have your reads as well please?

↑ BlueBloodedToffee wrote:Beck, can I have your reads as well please?

I can't believe you are asking me this when I have given my reads multiple times already

what are your reads? You had aronis and PC earlier and you unvoted aronis but haven't voted PC yet. So who are your top 3 scum reads and why

Hmm, if you say so. I'm only really interested in one read anyway.

Do you still believe PC scum-slipped?

yes I do

reads/reasons please

I plan on re-reading you/Shos/Desp when I get home a little later today due to Aronis being confirmed town.

Right now my top 3 scum are PC, Nati and Ace.

↑ Beck wrote:People should really be voting PC/gerain/nat

and yes I do say so...

obviously my read on gerain comes off because they claimed masons but I still don't like his play this game so I don't fully buy the claim.

PC because of low content/lurking.

Ace for his vote-sheeping.

Nati because low content/lurking/awkward confirmation post.

I was expecting your reads to have changed due to the new information.

Geraint is still in your top 3 for scum then?

If aronis is telling the truth, odds are there is at least 1 scum in the group of (Shos/Desp/Ace/You) cause no way the same 4 people are all town trying to lynch aronis who wasn't really that scummy.

p.edit -

↑ Beck wrote:obviously my read on gerain comes off because they claimed masons but I still don't like his play this game so I don't fully buy the claim.

That quote doesn't answer my question.

That quote says 'Geraint might be town if the claim is true but I don't really buy the claim so he might be scum'.

I want you to clarify.

Also, the point you're making about the Aronis wagon is a valid one. Which is why today's lynch should be someone from the Pants wagon because it's highly unlikely that wagon was all town and we have two confirmed townies on that wagon already.

That someone from the Pants wagon should be;

VOTE: PC

Your votes on Aronis look bad because you never really give any reason, despite claiming you did. When I ask you for a link to those reasons you point to your VCA which really isn't a reason.

Shos I am leery of but him not really sticking with an aronis lynch when that looked to be a viable one, makes me lean town on him.

Ace - I don't agree with him in post 308 where he says the "voting until something happens is scummy" because it really isn't imo. I also don't agree with him about his vote on DT being opportunistic.

Desperado - doesn't give any reasons at all for his votes. No wpost 590 is interesting because when responding to Aronis returning the accusation back to desperado about frustrated drawing scum, desperado says he isn't frustrated, he doesn't say that he isn't scum... That's not enough to lynch obviously but with his lack of content and bad votes, i could move him to the leaning scum pile.

i'd still prefer nat or pc get rope today though.

p.edit - Well I don't fully believe the claim so I don't have gerain as a town read. He's in my null/scummy read area until we get a mason flip. Because I also have seen/heard of scum claiming masons together. I also don't think masons make sense in a gambling theme game but that is playing the out guess the mod game so I won't go there.

why isn't it scummy beck? it's like a the perfectest way to look like you're scumhunting, and get a vote on the easiest wagon.

but voting different people is scum hunting, sometimes you have to vote people to make them uncomfortable. Very few scum actually vote hop from my experience and the people who usually attack vote hoppers more times than not turn out to be scum. Unpredictable people scare scum

↑ Beck wrote:Your votes on Aronis look bad because you never really give any reason, despite claiming you did. When I ask you for a link to those reasons you point to your VCA which really isn't a reason.

See 333, 367 and 370.

yeah i know. but he wasn't pressuring those people. he was just throwing votes. Throwing the vote and then hoping someone creates a reason to start a wagon, then hide on the wagon. Easiest scum strat ever

voting without reason is the best way to generate discussion. it forces people to interact with you if they choose to.

↑ BlueBloodedToffee wrote:

↑ Beck wrote:Your votes on Aronis look bad because you never really give any reason, despite claiming you did. When I ask you for a link to those reasons you point to your VCA which really isn't a reason.

See 333, 367 and 370.

thanks, i'll look these over later

Will post tonight.

Ger and Aronis, have either of you drawn Mason before?

↑ Desperado wrote:Ger and Aronis, have either of you drawn Mason before?

Vote: Perfect Chaos

No. And before you say I was stupid to claim so early. It wasn't my idea. I was happy to wait. It's just kinda hard to wait in my situation.

Ace - what is your read on Desperado?