Posted: Sat Jun 25, 2016 1:35 pm
Get used to being wrong a majority of the time, then?
https://forum.mafiascum-staging.net/
My general impression is that I find his demeanor antitown. He also says a lot of things that I just don't see town saying.In post 795, Wake1 wrote:What's your current take on Zach? He posts frequently.
No but I'd put my level of trust in that being a legit claim somewhere around fifteen percent.In post 795, Wake1 wrote:Anyone have meta on Titus doing Mason gambits?
In post 797, Dunnstral wrote:Titus are you serious why
In post 798, Dunnstral wrote: Wasn't going to let you get lynched
The intelligence level in this thread gave me no choice.In post 799, Dunnstral wrote:I never read you as town varsoon
In post 794, Wake1 wrote:Sorry.In post 789, Dunnstral wrote:In post 785, Wake1 wrote:Knowing we're only in Day 1, you can't know that. It's not obvious. I assume you know a skilled played can emulate her play.In post 780, Dunnstral wrote: Titus is obviously town here
I said I'd give detailed reasons tonight, but i liked how you implied I wasn't skilled and wouldn't catch on to whatever Titus would try pulling
I didn't hear you.
Was that a response?
Unfortunately. I obviously wasn't going to let her get lynched but whatever nowIn post 808, Zachstralkita wrote:Was that a serious mason claim...
In post 803, Mirhawk wrote:No but I'd put my level of trust in that being a legit claim somewhere around fifteen percent.In post 795, Wake1 wrote:Anyone have meta on Titus doing Mason gambits?
Sorry I'm more inclined to believe it's a level 92 scum gambitDunnstral wrote:Unfortunately. I obviously wasn't going to let her get lynched but whatever nowIn post 808, Zachstralkita wrote:Was that a serious mason claim...
He's aloof as ever. Meaning, in spite of the tiniest things, I can't tellIn post 806, Dunnstral wrote:Wake, can I get your opinion on Varsoon?
In post 801, Mirhawk wrote:My general impression is that I find his demeanor antitown. He also says a lot of things that I just don't see town saying.In post 795, Wake1 wrote:What's your current take on Zach? He posts frequently.
I don't like his reads much (though my own opinion of Dunn has gotten much worse over the last few pages), and he flails at everyone who attacks him.
You'd be more inclined to believe that lizards run the the government.In post 811, Zachstralkita wrote:In post 803, Mirhawk wrote:No but I'd put my level of trust in that being a legit claim somewhere around fifteen percent.In post 795, Wake1 wrote:Anyone have meta on Titus doing Mason gambits?Sorry I'm more inclined to believe it's a level 92 scum gambitDunnstral wrote:Unfortunately. I obviously wasn't going to let her get lynched but whatever nowIn post 808, Zachstralkita wrote:Was that a serious mason claim...
In post 814, Titus wrote:They do. In suits and false pretenses.In post 811, Zachstralkita wrote:In post 803, Mirhawk wrote:No but I'd put my level of trust in that being a legit claim somewhere around fifteen percent.In post 795, Wake1 wrote:Anyone have meta on Titus doing Mason gambits?Sorry I'm more inclined to believe it's a level 92 scum gambitDunnstral wrote:Unfortunately. I obviously wasn't going to let her get lynched but whatever nowIn post 808, Zachstralkita wrote:Was that a serious mason claim...
You'd be more inclined to believe that lizards run the the government.
In post 805, Dunnstral wrote:In post 794, Wake1 wrote:Sorry.In post 789, Dunnstral wrote:In post 785, Wake1 wrote:Knowing we're only in Day 1, you can't know that. It's not obvious. I assume you know a skilled played can emulate her play.In post 780, Dunnstral wrote: Titus is obviously town here
I said I'd give detailed reasons tonight, but i liked how you implied I wasn't skilled and wouldn't catch on to whatever Titus would try pulling
I didn't hear you.
Was that a response?
Ah. You had messed up your response earlier.In post 809, Dunnstral wrote:For post 805:
I said I'd give detailed reasons tonight, but i liked how you implied I wasn't skilled and wouldn't catch on to whatever Titus would try pulling
I find you flail-y in general.In post 813, Zachstralkita wrote:In post 801, Mirhawk wrote:My general impression is that I find his demeanor antitown. He also says a lot of things that I just don't see town saying.In post 795, Wake1 wrote:What's your current take on Zach? He posts frequently.
I don't like his reads much (though my own opinion of Dunn has gotten much worse over the last few pages), and he flails at everyone who attacks him.
You're attacking me, I'm not exactly flailing at you.
In post 821, Zachstralkita wrote:Does no one else find odd that 4 of Titus' scumreads are on her wagon? Like really? We're going out of our way just for little old you? I assume scum would NK rather than making a really loud fucking wagon on you.
It's not about the opinion about the logic in support. When people can't see look at me I'm so town posting, I start doubting the intelligence of the thread. Same when people fail to understand AtE and other basic terms.In post 820, Zachstralkita wrote:Titus, by your rationale would the rest of the thread scumreading me make it more intelligent?