Page 33 of 257

Posted: Sat Jun 25, 2016 1:35 pm
by Varsoon
Get used to being wrong a majority of the time, then?

Posted: Sat Jun 25, 2016 1:37 pm
by Mirhawk
In post 795, Wake1 wrote:What's your current take on Zach? He posts frequently.
My general impression is that I find his demeanor antitown. He also says a lot of things that I just don't see town saying.

I don't like his reads much (though my own opinion of Dunn has gotten much worse over the last few pages), and he flails at everyone who attacks him.

Posted: Sat Jun 25, 2016 1:37 pm
by Mirhawk
What do you think of him?

Posted: Sat Jun 25, 2016 1:38 pm
by Mirhawk
In post 795, Wake1 wrote:Anyone have meta on Titus doing Mason gambits?
No but I'd put my level of trust in that being a legit claim somewhere around fifteen percent.

Posted: Sat Jun 25, 2016 1:41 pm
by Titus
In post 797, Dunnstral wrote:Titus are you serious why
In post 798, Dunnstral wrote::facepalm: Wasn't going to let you get lynched
In post 799, Dunnstral wrote:I never read you as town varsoon
The intelligence level in this thread gave me no choice. :(

Posted: Sat Jun 25, 2016 1:43 pm
by Dunnstral
In post 794, Wake1 wrote:
In post 789, Dunnstral wrote:
In post 785, Wake1 wrote:
In post 780, Dunnstral wrote: Titus is obviously town here
Knowing we're only in Day 1, you can't know that. It's not obvious. I assume you know a skilled played can emulate her play.

I said I'd give detailed reasons tonight, but i liked how you implied I wasn't skilled and wouldn't catch on to whatever Titus would try pulling
:roll:
Sorry.

I didn't hear you.

Was that a response?

Posted: Sat Jun 25, 2016 1:46 pm
by Dunnstral
Wake, can I get your opinion on Varsoon?

Posted: Sat Jun 25, 2016 1:50 pm
by implosion
Haven't really felt like following this game with the pace it's going at. Especially with so many large swathes of posts in a row by people I'm already townreading.

I'll probably do some more work tomorrow or something but I really don't need another 3 pages of Dunn and Zach saying things.

I somewhat question Varsoon's asking how anyone could possibly see Dunn's play as town; I think even if you see his play as scummy it should be pretty easy to see why people townread him.

Posted: Sat Jun 25, 2016 1:55 pm
by Zachstralkita
Was that a serious mason claim...

Posted: Sat Jun 25, 2016 1:56 pm
by Dunnstral
For post 805:


I said I'd give detailed reasons tonight, but i liked how you implied I wasn't skilled and wouldn't catch on to whatever Titus would try pulling

Posted: Sat Jun 25, 2016 1:57 pm
by Dunnstral
In post 808, Zachstralkita wrote:Was that a serious mason claim...
Unfortunately. I obviously wasn't going to let her get lynched but whatever now

Posted: Sat Jun 25, 2016 1:59 pm
by Zachstralkita
In post 803, Mirhawk wrote:
In post 795, Wake1 wrote:Anyone have meta on Titus doing Mason gambits?
No but I'd put my level of trust in that being a legit claim somewhere around fifteen percent.
Dunnstral wrote:
In post 808, Zachstralkita wrote:Was that a serious mason claim...
Unfortunately. I obviously wasn't going to let her get lynched but whatever now
Sorry I'm more inclined to believe it's a level 92 scum gambit

Posted: Sat Jun 25, 2016 2:00 pm
by Wake1
In post 806, Dunnstral wrote:Wake, can I get your opinion on Varsoon?
He's aloof as ever. Meaning, in spite of the tiniest things, I can't tell

Skilled player: should be prompted to participate further.

His brevity makes reading him difficult.

Varsoon, give me more exposition on who you think is Town/Scum and why.

Posted: Sat Jun 25, 2016 2:03 pm
by Zachstralkita
In post 801, Mirhawk wrote:
In post 795, Wake1 wrote:What's your current take on Zach? He posts frequently.
My general impression is that I find his demeanor antitown. He also says a lot of things that I just don't see town saying.

I don't like his reads much (though my own opinion of Dunn has gotten much worse over the last few pages), and he flails at everyone who attacks him.


You're attacking me, I'm not exactly flailing at you.

Posted: Sat Jun 25, 2016 2:03 pm
by Titus
In post 811, Zachstralkita wrote:
In post 803, Mirhawk wrote:
In post 795, Wake1 wrote:Anyone have meta on Titus doing Mason gambits?
No but I'd put my level of trust in that being a legit claim somewhere around fifteen percent.
Dunnstral wrote:
In post 808, Zachstralkita wrote:Was that a serious mason claim...
Unfortunately. I obviously wasn't going to let her get lynched but whatever now
Sorry I'm more inclined to believe it's a level 92 scum gambit
You'd be more inclined to believe that lizards run the the government.

Posted: Sat Jun 25, 2016 2:04 pm
by Zachstralkita
In post 814, Titus wrote:
In post 811, Zachstralkita wrote:
In post 803, Mirhawk wrote:
In post 795, Wake1 wrote:Anyone have meta on Titus doing Mason gambits?
No but I'd put my level of trust in that being a legit claim somewhere around fifteen percent.
Dunnstral wrote:
In post 808, Zachstralkita wrote:Was that a serious mason claim...
Unfortunately. I obviously wasn't going to let her get lynched but whatever now
Sorry I'm more inclined to believe it's a level 92 scum gambit
They do. In suits and false pretenses.

You'd be more inclined to believe that lizards run the the government.

Posted: Sat Jun 25, 2016 2:04 pm
by Zachstralkita
I butchered that fucking quote gonma go backflip off a cliff now fuck you phone

Posted: Sat Jun 25, 2016 2:05 pm
by Dunnstral
Nice quote losexcept I did the same thing in 805

Posted: Sat Jun 25, 2016 2:07 pm
by Wake1
In post 805, Dunnstral wrote:
In post 794, Wake1 wrote:
In post 789, Dunnstral wrote:
In post 785, Wake1 wrote:
In post 780, Dunnstral wrote: Titus is obviously town here
Knowing we're only in Day 1, you can't know that. It's not obvious. I assume you know a skilled played can emulate her play.

I said I'd give detailed reasons tonight, but i liked how you implied I wasn't skilled and wouldn't catch on to whatever Titus would try pulling
:roll:
Sorry.

I didn't hear you.

Was that a response?
In post 809, Dunnstral wrote:For post 805:


I said I'd give detailed reasons tonight, but i liked how you implied I wasn't skilled and wouldn't catch on to whatever Titus would try pulling
Ah. You had messed up your response earlier.
Making crystal clear.



...


On the matter of clarity
, I want you to verify that you thought I was speaking of you when I mentioned skill.

...because I meant Titus—a skilled player—who is capable of emulating her meta.

Clarify.

Posted: Sat Jun 25, 2016 2:08 pm
by Mirhawk
In post 813, Zachstralkita wrote:
In post 801, Mirhawk wrote:
In post 795, Wake1 wrote:What's your current take on Zach? He posts frequently.
My general impression is that I find his demeanor antitown. He also says a lot of things that I just don't see town saying.

I don't like his reads much (though my own opinion of Dunn has gotten much worse over the last few pages), and he flails at everyone who attacks him.


You're attacking me, I'm not exactly flailing at you.
I find you flail-y in general.

Posted: Sat Jun 25, 2016 2:09 pm
by Zachstralkita
Titus, by your rationale would the rest of the thread scumreading me make it more intelligent?

Posted: Sat Jun 25, 2016 2:11 pm
by Zachstralkita
Does no one else find odd that 4 of Titus' scumreads are on her wagon? Like really? We're going out of our way just for little old you? I assume scum would NK rather than making a really loud fucking wagon on you.

Posted: Sat Jun 25, 2016 2:14 pm
by Dunnstral
@Wake no I knew you were talking about Titus, thought I was being pretty clear in what I wrote

Posted: Sat Jun 25, 2016 2:15 pm
by Dunnstral
In post 821, Zachstralkita wrote:Does no one else find odd that 4 of Titus' scumreads are on her wagon? Like really? We're going out of our way just for little old you? I assume scum would NK rather than making a really loud fucking wagon on you.

Why are you still pushing Titus?

Posted: Sat Jun 25, 2016 2:15 pm
by Titus
In post 820, Zachstralkita wrote:Titus, by your rationale would the rest of the thread scumreading me make it more intelligent?
It's not about the opinion about the logic in support. When people can't see look at me I'm so town posting, I start doubting the intelligence of the thread. Same when people fail to understand AtE and other basic terms.

Dunn and I disagree about Varsoon but he's not spouting falsehoods.