Mafiascum.net

In post 802, Transcend wrote:[p]787[/p] is horrendous. both quotes from mathblade in the pyramid. awful.

In post 810, Manuel87 wrote:

In post 377, Gamma Emerald wrote:Meh I think Creature feels a bit lynchbaity.

Here my read on Gamma started to change.
Why are you calling him lynchbaity here?
He didnt post much up to this point and most of it was NAI at best.

In post 414, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 409, Zachstralkita wrote:I can tell you with certainty you're wrong on one of three of those, and that one is me

So you are saying S_S is scum, as Math is right about him and Dunn?

Twisting around what Zach said and asking a stupid question.

In post 471, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 470, Donempire wrote: yeah fuck it if we get a speedlynch thatd be fun
VOTE: zach

Why do you want the day to end early? Wanna talk with your buddies?

Just feels off. There was no way a speedlynch would have happened at that point. I also think it was quite obvious that Dong was joking.

In post 555, Gamma Emerald wrote:We're wasting daylight.
VOTE: AlpacaAlpaca

Random vote on someone that didnt reply for 2 days and was scumreading him, with no reason. Suggesting we dont have time to waste when its still 10 days before Deadline.

In post 564, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 561, Infinity 324 wrote:

In post 553, Dunnstral wrote:

In post 551, XnadrojX wrote:Has JarJar talked? Like as in anything of significance?

How much of the game have you read

Let's lynch creature

Willing to join this wagon. Definitely looks like Micro 647.
VOTE: Creature

Vote on supposed lynchbait because of a metaread.
Mind to explain that read? Because i wont read a whole game when i dont see your reasoning.

In post 678, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 676, Dunnstral wrote:VOTE: Gamma Emerald

HAHAHA you fuck. This dude threw shade at Transcend, didn't vote him, and then voted me for following Transcend and calling him out on his actions. This is scum.
VOTE: Dunnstral

Dunnstrals reaction was legit. He is also overreacting to the vote.
Do you think Dunnstral had a good reason to vote Transcend?

In post 709, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 708, MathBlade wrote:Pretty much that post is so completely terribad it's making me doubt my prior theory. It is just that bad.

Okay so you're reads are that fragile that one post can change them.
Okaaaaaay...

So maths reads a fragile because they changed one read?
Why are you scumreading Math now just after they started scumreading you?

In post 809, Gamma Emerald wrote:YO JARJAR I SEE YOU ARE ONLINE; GET IN HERE!

In post 468, Transcend wrote:

In post 465, Creature wrote:VOTE: Zachstralkita

Oh good, another scum pulling a gambit.

This is a very bad post

In post 811, Gamma Emerald wrote:This is the THIRD OMGUS accusation you made.

In post 814, Something_Smart wrote:

In post 811, Gamma Emerald wrote:This is the THIRD OMGUS accusation you made.

Please elaborate, because I don't see any OMGUS accusations.

In post 470, Donempire wrote:

In post 458, Zachstralkita wrote:if im not mistaken Math that amazing confidence you possess, which is actually arrogance, shined brilliantly in Wake's Role Madness where you embarrassed yourself with your reads in regard to myself and Dunnstral's hydra. So did Shaziro.

If anyone cares to know, Dunn said something random offhandedly and those two geniuses turned it into a "mafia crumb" because it was a song lyric. And Dunn said the word blue.

I thought they were joking, but no no no it was a serious read. Which made it even more of a joke to me. But that was the fruit of your genuine detective work.

Yet you're not fazed at all. Really love the tenacity, but it just seems like such a waste. Like you post that, go to work all day, then come back home and still think the same thing? You spent your recreational time formulating bullshit? I'm just telling you in advance, you're going to be sort of disappointed. What is the end result? Because you're not gonna get me lynched. Even if you did, I would flip green. And I think your reads on Dunn and S_S are ludicrous anyway.

Please please please divert your precious precious energy elsewhere, maybe someplace it will be useful. Go wild. Give us some percent equations maybe. Then solve them while we find scum and stuff. I'm telling you, it's gonna be great.

let the guy do his thing if he has fun in it. even better for us if he makes good points. also, "kill me im green" cliche continues like anyones gonna claim red.

In post 467, Transcend wrote:Z is a mislynch

why

In post 468, Transcend wrote:

In post 465, Creature wrote:VOTE: Zachstralkita

Oh good, another scum pulling a gambit.

This is a very bad post

why2.0

In post 462, Dunnstral wrote:VOTE: Zachstralkita

will you ever be usefull

yeah fuck it if we get a speedlynch thatd be fun
VOTE: zach

In post 815, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 814, Something_Smart wrote:

In post 811, Gamma Emerald wrote:This is the THIRD OMGUS accusation you made.

Please elaborate, because I don't see any OMGUS accusations.

1) Alpaca
2) Dunnstral
3) MathBlade

In post 317, AlpacaAlpaca wrote: I am not liking Gamma, and JarJar right now but Dunn and infinity seem pretty cool

In post 703, MathBlade wrote:

In post 700, Something_Smart wrote:

In post 698, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 697, Something_Smart wrote:

In post 693, Gamma Emerald wrote:I think Creature can be, but I don't really think he is lynchbait anymore.

So what did you mean by "These 2 can go together"?

Lynchbait means they're an easy target for the lynch. That doesn't preclude them from being scum.

In 377 you used it as an argument in favor of him being town.

LOL Wow...completely scum trying to look like they are interacting with each other. *blinks*
Excuse me while I try to invent a way to wash off the scumminess of this post from my body...Grosssssssss........

In post 704, Gamma Emerald wrote: Who are you calling scum here?

In post 706, MathBlade wrote:Pedit: Both you and Something smart, Gamma.

In post 494, MathBlade wrote:Look who tried to deceive town. Look where my vote is.

In post 819, JarJarDrinks wrote:

In post 494, MathBlade wrote:Look who tried to deceive town. Look where my vote is.

Is this referring to Dunn saying Mafia has an encrypter? If so, please explain how that is scummy.

In post 820, Gamma Emerald wrote:@Manuel: Alpaca was a pressure/reaction vote, Math is not a scumread, just someone I wouldn't trust with my life.

In post 526, Zachstralkita wrote:

Infinity 324 wrote:

In post 518, Zachstralkita wrote:why is there talk of an encryptor...

No idea

Why is your vote on zachstralkita

I thought something useful would come out of it tbh

UNVOTE: Zachstralkita

all i have now is creature maybe scummier?

In post 822, Manuel87 wrote:

In post 820, Gamma Emerald wrote:@Manuel: Alpaca was a pressure/reaction vote, Math is not a scumread, just someone I wouldn't trust with my life.

What reaction did you hope to get from an inactive slot by pressuring with L-6?
I am not saying you scumread them i am saying you try to dismiss their reads as fragile because they changed their read on you to scum.