Sid Meier's Civilization 5 UPick Mafia (GAME OVER)
Forum rules
- Shaziro
-
Shaziro Mafia Scum
- Shaziro
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2574
- Joined: April 20, 2016
- Location: Doggoland
- Varsoon
-
Varsoon Scatman
- Varsoon
- Scatman
- Scatman
- Posts: 18738
- Joined: February 18, 2013
In post 798, Elbirn wrote:
Sure. Why does town-varsoon care?In post 795, Varsoon wrote:
Speculating?In post 791, Elbirn wrote:>Varsoon is speculating about multiball
REEEEEEEEEEEE
UNVOTE:
VOTE: Varsoon
REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
It's a fact, Elbirn. No way with Venmar's mod meta does he make this singleball.
Dude, maybe read my posts.- Venmar
-
Venmar Jack of All Trades
- Venmar
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6842
- Joined: May 6, 2012
- Location: the ordeal of life
- Venmar
-
Venmar Jack of All Trades
- Venmar
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6842
- Joined: May 6, 2012
- Location: the ordeal of life
In post 647, brassherald wrote:@mod if we get to the point where the host for the world congress and the runner up are set and cannot be altered even though there may be some delegates not cast, would that set off the world congress, or do we need to wait for all delegates to be cast?The WC will resolve once someone has reached a majority. The person with the second-highest amount of votes at that time will become the runner-up. OR, once all delegates have been cast, in which case host and runnerup are decided by plurality.
Unfortunately I cannot answer this question with a yes or a no.a sad fuck- BuJaber
-
BuJaber Mafia Scum
- BuJaber
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3840
- Joined: November 8, 2017
Kokichi - you don't see any benefit in forcing scum to target the IC? From what I understand world leader changes anyway every day. If brass lives we vote him again if he doesn't we dont. The 'term' for hosting isn't until death. And if they choose not to we have a confirmed townie as host for subsequent days.
I don't understand why multiball scum means Varsoon is town. Multiball scum makes you think twice about every townread/scumread. It makes you think twice about why and how people are voting for the congress host. Also unless I misunderstood him his arguments are assuming that world host and resolutions are very significant and impactful that scum would fight hard to get. Why are we assuming this? Players can vote for resolutions. World host doesn't get his way he just gets a 2nd vote while literally being in the spotlight. I don't think scum would play the world congress mechanic as brazenly as you think.
Therefore I am not so sure of the town motivation for thinking about and putting the idea of multiball out there.
Furthermore he is simply reading too much into the role pm. The only objective point he made was the mod meta analysis. But how much we can rely on that? I don't know a lot about how people mod here but I don't really see why hosting a certain way x number of times means you would do it again.
Not to mention of course that I generally dislike discussions that are not directly going to help people scumhunt more effectively. Say we agree that it is multiball or that we will take it into account at least. How does that change the way we scumread anyway? All I can think of is it adds more doubt and make us second guess ourselves. Not only that but multiball means our ability to sort people based on flips is hurt significantly. If someone flips scum does that mean people on their wagon are a) town lynching scum b) scum lynching other scumteam c) scum bussing. How would you know one way or another?
Basically the real question I'm asking here is why is multiball speculation pro-town when we have no evidence at all to suggest it yet?- BuJaber
-
BuJaber Mafia Scum
- BuJaber
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3840
- Joined: November 8, 2017
- BuJaber
-
BuJaber Mafia Scum
- BuJaber
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3840
- Joined: November 8, 2017
I mean isn't considering every single possibility not the correct way to play as town? You want to in general explain scumreads/townreads in the simplest way you can. This means you go with the obvious things and your gut most of the time and test things out. If you are doubting yourself at every step you are an ineffective town. It's the whole reason why mafia game requires you to have something of an ego and a reasonable level of stubborness. Otherwise you will be distracted thinking about the most convuluted of ways to clear your scumreads of any liability / suspect your townreads.- Varsoon
-
Varsoon Scatman
- Varsoon
- Scatman
- Scatman
- Posts: 18738
- Joined: February 18, 2013
I literally explain why it's an important consideration, why the mechanic is something scum would want control over, and how, by design, this setup is very likely to be multiball.
I'm not going to repeat myself, just actually read my posts this time.
I'm not introducing some epic level of wifom, either. I could see how you'd have that argument against me if I was using multiball spec to try to guide wagons in ways they weren't going, but that's not the case at all.
When this game is confirmed as multiball, you can apologize for doubting me.- BuJaber
-
BuJaber Mafia Scum
- BuJaber
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3840
- Joined: November 8, 2017
I did read your posts.
I wasn't asking you why you are speculating about multiball. I was asking those who townread you for it to explain why since I see no town motivation to do so. So at best your spec should be NAI.
And I have no problem apologizing to you if it is indeed multiball and you flip town. I will apologize that I suspected you. But there's still not a good speculation for town so you know your alignment doesn't change that and whether or not you're right doean't change that. My argument is pretty clearly about how does speculating about multiball at this stage of the game help town?- Varsoon
-
Varsoon Scatman
- Varsoon
- Scatman
- Scatman
- Posts: 18738
- Joined: February 18, 2013
If it's a play that has no intrinsic town motivation to it, then why, as scum, would I do it? Wouldn't I want to do 'town motivated' things as scum?
That's what WIFOM looks like.
I'm also not speculating, either. I'm declaring that it is definitely multiball for the reasons I laid out and that our considerations of how to play around the public mechanic and how to read certain plays should be tailored towards that fact.
I'm very confident that it'll be confirmed as multiball after N1, regardless.
I'm also trying to express the way that I am seeing the setup so that people understand my thought process a little better.
Consider if I continued to play privately assuming multiball but not saying so--that'd be confusing for people.
If anything, your attempts to throw shade on the whole thing reek of scum who wants to keep town in the dark and have them keep playing in a way that's not fit for solving the actual game at hand. I don't get why you're so critical of this. Townreads on me make plenty of sense, too, so I don't get where your confusion is coming from there--I'm sharing the way I am approaching the game, giving clarity to how I'm proceeding, making reading my slot more transparent for town and, for scum, it makes sense to townread me because they KNOW it's multiball.- Varsoon
-
Varsoon Scatman
- Varsoon
- Scatman
- Scatman
- Posts: 18738
- Joined: February 18, 2013
Scum benefit way more by keeping multiball hidden from town--it lets them gambit claiming vigilante rather than a second scum kill and it keeps town from gamesolving efficiently. I see your attempts to discredit my discovery as 'speculation' as anti-town. I don't comprehend how you could disagree with certain points on the game design only making sense as a multiball setup given what we know about the public mechanics.- BuJaber
-
BuJaber Mafia Scum
- BuJaber
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3840
- Joined: November 8, 2017
Well I thought you were speculating.
If you're sure it does make a difference in what you would do. So I apologize for not realizing your confidence.
But see now if you're right it's good for town. If you're wrong it's bad for town. So I think it is a reckless thing to do day 1. Especially if you think we will get confirmation as early as N1.
Also it's only good for scum to keep us in the dark about multiball if they know for a fact that it is multiball. If they don't know or if they know that it is singleball then the scum benefit is obvious as I explained. It makes us question every read. It makes it possible for town to kill both people in a TvS because they think it could be SvS. It makes it impossible to townread people just for scumhunting. Etc.
You didn't answer my question regarding the world congress. Why do you assume it's so good for scum to control it? Why do you think it's overpowered if it's singleball? You think it's reasonable for a 5 or 6 person scumteam champion their partner to host when it would literally put them all in danger?- BuJaber
-
BuJaber Mafia Scum
- BuJaber
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3840
- Joined: November 8, 2017
- Varsoon
-
Varsoon Scatman
- Varsoon
- Scatman
- Scatman
- Posts: 18738
- Joined: February 18, 2013
Then just take it only as a consideration rather than an absolute until it's mod-confirmed.
I don't know your experience with mafia, but I've never designed or seen a game where scum were unaware a setup was multiball. It's usually pretty obvious when you see your team is only two or three people in a 21p setup.
It's good for scum to get the extra votes. To actually 'control' it would take a degree of rhetorical prowess that'd likely reflect scum winning the game independent of the mechanic anyway.
I already explained how it's lean-scum in singleball due to how easy it would be for scum players to amass enough extra delegates to ensure the resolutions and congress leaders they want always get into power after only a few days.
I don't think it'd be something as obvious as all the scum clearly dogpiling votes on a single candidate on their own team, but more along the lines of scum being able to build lots of vote momentum for candidates that will only benefit them (people they know they can control. kill, influence, etc.) and against candidates they know are trouble for them.
There's not a bigger chance for town to vote scum in multiball for world congress because the total amount of scum would be the same. Yes, you could end up in a situation where both world congress leaders are on different scumteams, but the same situation could happen much easier for two scum on the same team in a singleball setup. Consider one scum 'running against' the other, ending up with town splitting their votes between the two and scum secretly doing so as well to make those candidates seem like the clear-cut ones to vote between. That's way more likely to happen with a single scumteam rather than multiple smaller ones.- BuJaber
-
BuJaber Mafia Scum
- BuJaber
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3840
- Joined: November 8, 2017
- Varsoon
-
Varsoon Scatman
- Varsoon
- Scatman
- Scatman
- Posts: 18738
- Joined: February 18, 2013
Well, at the very least, if this is confirmed as multiball, I don't think that you've been feigning that sort of ignorance and you're more likely town due to it.- Kokichi Oma
-
Kokichi Oma Survivor
- Kokichi Oma
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10491
- Joined: October 22, 2017
..What?In post 800, Shaziro wrote:Hrmmm...Creature, Varsoon, Almost50. If they are all scum, there is undoubtably a team in there somewhere. Guess I'll look for some associatives.How do you expect to find the culprit when you're all worried about each other's feelings? If you're planning to expose a liar, then you have to corner them psychologically.- Kokichi Oma
-
Kokichi Oma Survivor
- Kokichi Oma
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10491
- Joined: October 22, 2017
Okay? And he will die if he's both. If he's not the WC host, then there is a chance they kill the host.In post 804, BuJaber wrote:Kokichi - you don't see any benefit in forcing scum to target the IC? From what I understand world leader changes anyway every day. If brass lives we vote him again if he doesn't we dont. The 'term' for hosting isn't until death. And if they choose not to we have a confirmed townie as host for subsequent days.How do you expect to find the culprit when you're all worried about each other's feelings? If you're planning to expose a liar, then you have to corner them psychologically.- Kokichi Oma
-
Kokichi Oma Survivor
- Kokichi Oma
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10491
- Joined: October 22, 2017
That whole Varsoon/BuJab convo was pointless. Who cares about setup spec right now. Find mafia and give reasons. The longer that goes on the more anti town it is.How do you expect to find the culprit when you're all worried about each other's feelings? If you're planning to expose a liar, then you have to corner them psychologically.- brassherald
-
brassherald Mafia Scum
- brassherald
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4964
- Joined: December 21, 2017
- Location: New York
- Kokichi Oma
-
Kokichi Oma Survivor
- Kokichi Oma
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10491
- Joined: October 22, 2017
- brassherald
-
brassherald Mafia Scum
- brassherald
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4964
- Joined: December 21, 2017
- Location: New York
I think it limits the extra vote to today's vote. Not over time when I said the host got extra permanent delegates, I was mistaken.In post 820, Kokichi Oma wrote:Yes. But host gets an extra vote. We need for that person to be alive. To have more influence.
(emphasis added)Every day, the playerbase will vote amongst themselves who among them should be the Host of the World Congress. The Host gets an additional delegatefor the day, and gets to choose a resolution from a list for the playerbase to vote on. The player with the second highest amount of votes for Host will choose a second resolution to vote for. - brassherald
- Kokichi Oma
- brassherald
- Kokichi Oma
- Kokichi Oma
- Kokichi Oma
- Varsoon
- BuJaber
- Varsoon
- BuJaber
- BuJaber
- Varsoon
- Varsoon
- BuJaber
- Varsoon
- BuJaber
- BuJaber
- BuJaber
- Venmar
- Venmar
- Varsoon
- Shaziro