Mafiascum.net

In post 437, Nosferatu wrote:kokichi can be town too i think, i like the mood

In post 803, Ginngie wrote:OKAY

mastina saying a thing, perfectly okay

Dunn thinking it's fake, given that it's mastina, yeah sure I can buy it

Kaede wanting to know why? Perfectly reasonable question

Moment taking issue with someone simply asking a question on their stance

now that's bullshit

In post 536, Wisdom wrote:

In post 533, Human Sequencer wrote:i know
i checked your account

i dunno where to vote zzz
every wagon has people i both do and dont like on it

Vote hebi, we'll sort grapes later

In post 116, Moment wrote:

In post 114, Kaede Akamatsu wrote:

In post 113, Moment wrote:I have a hard time believing that anyone could actually have this sort of thought process and ask that question.

The underline is that, FakeGod has in fact used a role that has been present on several players but effective at different game days for each, hence seeing a D3 IC is not something outside what he would do, hence I asked that question. It is possible that Dunnstral either A) Doesn't know this, B) Is trying to throw shade at mastina or C) Does in fact have something to counter that statement. The question is to verify within which option does this fall.

Ah, I understand. Your original question implied a much less nuanced view; at least, that's how I read it. I'm actually in agreement with you there in wondering what Dunnstral may have to strictly counterclaim mastina.

Thinking more, if Dunnstral truly

did

have something that would imply that mastina was scum fakeclaiming, I would have expected him to elaborate more, or at least say something else; after all, finding someone as confirmed scum seems to warrant more words than simply "nice fakeclaim". It's possible that Dunnstral thought that mastina was fakeclaiming and yet still town, but in that case one wonders what his motivation for counterclaiming would be in the first place.

It seems as though Dunnstral was revealing some sort of Innocent Child role anyways meaning these questions will be largely irrelevant in the context of determining Dunnstral's alignment, but if not they're worth considering.



With that misconception cleared up, I'm not actually certain where my vote would be right now, could I use it.

In post 482, zMuffinMan wrote:isaac
hs
mastina
moment
kokichi
purr
grapes
andriod
dunnstral
-----LYNCH BELOW THIS LINE----- <-- i want to move this line a couple notches down but i can't in good faith
nosferatu
wisdom
hebi
kaede
ginngie
nancy
cupcake

In post 119, Moment wrote:

In post 118, zMuffinMan wrote:orrrrrrrrrr crazy theory, dunnstral was joking

If he was, the humor was certainly lost on me. Is that how you interpreted it when you first saw it?

In post 122, Moment wrote:I'm not sure how meaningful it is, but on some unexplainable instinctual level I find it strange how, if that's your viewpoint, this was your reaction to my theorizing:

In post 118, zMuffinMan wrote:orrrrrrrrrr crazy theory, dunnstral was joking

In post 808, Ginngie wrote:also muffin, by your definition of fence sitting, this pretty much is how moment backed out of the accusation.

By then agreeing with Kaede about what was weird about Dunn's post and then going on about how some things are possible, and that there are motivations probably, but doesn't explore it. Just says that it's possible.

Also this is another thing but I find it lowkey PR hunting for roles that can confirm people as town to try and bring up discussion about roles like that and who is doing what with it.

In post 809, mastina wrote:With the exception of Dunnstral and Nosferatu, your list is literally an exact inverse of mine.

In post 809, mastina wrote:Dunnstral/Wisdom/hebichan/Kaede Akamatsu/Ginngie/Nancy Drew/Katsuki; all of them are townreads.

In post 809, mastina wrote:I would lynch in Brian Skies/Human Sequencer/Kokichi Oma/Purrcoet/grapes/andriod/Nosferatu.

In post 805, Ginngie wrote:muffin the fuck is your moment town read based on

In post 810, Ginngie wrote:okay question

Do you have a sense of humour

or is your personality in mafia to take every post strictly serious.

I need to know because this could create issues if we communicate on different wavelengths

In post 779, Nosferatu wrote:

In post 747, Moment wrote:Could you restate those intentions for me, if you don't mind? I don't recall hearing you ever actually scumread me and on a review of you ISO all I see is this:

its right there

In post 812, Moment wrote:Can you really call a misconception being cleared up "backing out"?

I didn't interpret Dunn's post as a joke initially; it seemed obvious to me that he was counterclaiming mastina with some other kind of Innocent Child role. Under that interpretation, someone asking what would make Dunn think that mastina is scum would be a stupidly obvious question; that's why someone actually having the thought process and asking that question seemed so unrealistic to me.

It seems to me like you've simply chosen this as something to scumread rather than objectively looking at the context; unless you have a really good explanation, I think just objectively speaking saying that what I said was "backing out of an accusation" instead of a being the clearing of a misconception is false.

In post 812, Moment wrote:

I didn't interpret Dunn's post as a joke initially; it seemed obvious to me that he was counterclaiming mastina with some other kind of Innocent Child role. Under that interpretation, someone asking what would make Dunn think that mastina is scum would be a stupidly obvious question; that's why someone actually having the thought process and asking that question seemed so unrealistic to me.

It seems to me like you've simply chosen this as something to scumread rather than objectively looking at the context; unless you have a really good explanation, I think just objectively speaking saying that what I said was "backing out of an accusation" instead of a being the clearing of a misconception is false.

In post 812, Moment wrote:

I didn't interpret Dunn's post as a joke initially; it seemed obvious to me that he was counterclaiming mastina with some other kind of Innocent Child role. Under that interpretation, someone asking what would make Dunn think that mastina is scum would be a stupidly obvious question; that's why someone actually having the thought process and asking that question seemed so unrealistic to me.

In post 812, Moment wrote:

Under that interpretation, someone asking what would make Dunn think that mastina is scum would be a stupidly obvious question; that's why someone actually having the thought process and asking that question seemed so unrealistic to me.

In post 812, Moment wrote:

a stupidly obvious question; asking that question seemed so unrealistic to me.

In post 584, zMuffinMan wrote:now is the part of the day where people should start forming larger wagons instead of having lots of small ones

Moment [4]

- Nosferatu, Nancy Drew 39, Purrcocet, Wisdom

Katsuki [4]

- zMuffinMan, Dunnstral, Kaede Akamatsu, andriod18

Ginngie [2]

- Moment, Human Sequencer

Wisdom [2]

- Kokichi Oma, Katsuki

hebichan [1]

- grapes

Kokichi Oma [1]

- mastina

mastina [1]

- hebichan

Nancy Drew 39 [1]

- Brian Skies

Not Voting [1]

- Ginngie
the wisdom, kokichi, mastina wagons should probably collapse and move to a different wagon because they really aren't viable

In post 619, zMuffinMan wrote:i don't think moment is scum