Posted: Mon Jul 02, 2018 8:34 pm
PS I think I know but I wont out you... I dunno if I'm allowed to PM you whilst we are playing
Don't twist so hard you're gonna hurt yourself.In post 798, HitAlt wrote:Last post of my spam for now - this is flawed.In post 781, xyzzy wrote:basically he started out by saying "these three people are the scum team" and as soon as people started to apply, like, any scrutiny at all to the idea of guessing the scum team that early, he was like "ACTUALLY I just think this one person is scum and the other two are scum leans. I made this assertion for Very Smart Reasons"
Go check the situation and posting around my accused backpedaling.
My honeypot got very mild scrutiny and critique towards it in the start, and I actually got three votes on SkyG before I revealed why I had done what I did.
Now tell me this:why would I "backpedal" on those "faked scumreads" as scum?
It would only fit if I was scum WITH Sky, and was afraid that the "bus" would go through.
Which I'm not, and I wasn't either - I still would like for us to lynch SkyG because I believe there's a high chance for scum there, and even if not red, it would help me advance my VCA for tomorrow.
So assuming scum!Hit, I would've brought myself to the front, called a list of people I'm willing to lynch (most of who propably could've been lynched as well), and then made an unnecessary soft-turn to annoy people?
Solid theory - pick another.
The "ugh" was because I read through your posts and didn't see townreads so I wasn't very sure of your thinking originally.In post 785, MagnaofIllusion wrote:@Taly– I’m not sure how much depth you are looking for in my response to you.
First off the answer that I’m least happy with is your answer to the “Townreads” query from me. I know you aren’t Dave. However that whole answer feels like a sort-of meandering tour. You really sort of sidestepped the whole issue of why you asked in the first place if having Townreads in the first 24 hours isn’t unreasonable. Frankly the whole question was driven by the way you opened the question to me in the first place. The “Ugh” insinuated that somehow there was an expectation that I should have more to say about Town. Which I think would be pretty damn odd for the first 24 hours of the game regardless of how much a player normally gives Townreads. Which what little direct experience with me you have should have suggested I’m much more a scum-read driven player.
As a newer player, I can see why someone would still be forming their approach to Mafia and thus reads, and Large games were hell for me in 2015. But I don't think about the joindate of a player until it's pointed out, or I look out of curiosity.In post 785, MagnaofIllusion wrote:My followup to you is this – how much game-solve should you expect from a brand new player in a Large game where there is a pretty sizeable group of players who seem well acquainted with each other? I had communication before the game even finished signups with Pine in which he confirmed to me Sky was a completely new account and not an alt. That upon replacing in you immediately started scum-reading a completely raw player didn’t set well with my gut.
In post 785, MagnaofIllusion wrote:What do I think of profii – I don’t per-se. He’s in my deep null pool at the moment (other members included xyzzy and HewhoSwims). There’s a bit of chummy “be friends” from him that I find reminiscent of Firebringer and thus want to dismiss. His posting really just reads as “there”. I’d really have to give him a deep ISO dive to move him in either direction as it stands. And I have other irons in the fire right now.
Since he appears to be in your Town pool why don’t you give me some wordage behind that? Thanks.
This is how I feel about the playerlist and being scumread right now.Elbirn wrote:Speaking of which, I've done fuckall to gamesolve but everyone in this game townreads me. Guarantee scum cozying up to me in hope that my whimsical and flippant nature can make me easy to sway, or something.
Yeah. I totally got that you don't want my lynch D1.In post 796, HitAlt wrote:Taly apparently didn't get my point about not wanting them lynched D1, but trying to force my point across is likely not very smart.
ITS HAPPENING
Par for the course, really.In post 782, xyzzy wrote:also this is such a bad post. catastrophically badIn post 759, HitAlt wrote:This is easily the worst thing you could do at this point.
Join a wagon on a player we actually should and/or can lynch today.
Whether you like my antics or not I am not scum, and will not be lynched this game. (or on this alt for that matter unless town enjoys trolling)
Thanks. I'll try to post mornings/evenings the next couple days.In post 785, MagnaofIllusion wrote:Hey Andy … first let me say Happy Birthday to you! Also as an aside sometime out of game you need to fill me in on the full story regarding Plum and 2017 … I am definitely out of the loop and feel like there is something very cool there I missed out on in Bakerland.
I'll consider this further, but you should know I didn't start this as a policy lynch. I think there's a decent chance of them being scum underneath the layers of ego yet I will consider your words. Like I'm considering Rask.In post 785, MagnaofIllusion wrote:On to the topic of HitAlt – while part of me would be happy to wagon on policy. I mean I have had my fill of hidden alts who act inscrutable, arrogant and needlessly opaque about their thoughts and almost Outed from the signups when I saw HitAlt join. Reading 729 almost pushed me to it. But I know my absolute disdain for hidden alts is completely clouding my judgement on whether HitAlt is scummy or just playing a dumb game behind the mask of an alt. Can you say that you honestly that you aren’t just turned off by his posting style as opposed to seeing scum intent? If so I’ll happily devote some time to a detailed read on HitAlt.
I know this wasn't meant for me, but this actually helps me out somewhat, thanks.In post 785, MagnaofIllusion wrote:What do I think of profii – I don’t per-se. He’s in my deep null pool at the moment (other members included xyzzy and HewhoSwims). There’s a bit of chummy “be friends” from him that I find reminiscent of Firebringer and thus want to dismiss.
This game could use more effort and less sportscasting.In post 796, HitAlt wrote:I just can't find the energy to check who they were exactly, but undoubtedly some combination of the people I poked at..go figure.
Yes, I did.In post 797, HitAlt wrote:Andrius replaced Gus, right?
While a welcome change in many ways, I think their reads were a bit shaky in that catchup.
Also the way they kept building to that "vote HitAlt with me" before reaching Infernos vote on me in their catchup..yea it feels like scum faking it.
I like Andrius the person, but not Andrius the character..! (anyone? know the reference?)
As long as its not related to the game (like two old friends catching up on personal lives) most mods don't have a problem with it.In post 800, profii wrote:I dunno if I'm allowed to PM you whilst we are playing
I haven't played mafia in roughly a year, save for the couples game that ended around this time last year. Chickadee was in that game.In post 803, Taly wrote:Never saw Inferno, Gustavo, or Andrius before.
I'd like to clarify, that I had you pinned as a scumread, but also think that it's hard to discern a lynchbaity townplayer from scum with a limited amount of posts and flips (=every D1 ever).In post 801, Skygazer wrote:It gives you reason to vote for someone (me) who you described as potential lynchbait.
This is almost "correct", but realize thatIn post 801, Skygazer wrote:By calling it a honeypot it seems like you're trying to preemptively distance yourself from any criticisms of voting for lynchbait. If I were to be lynched and flip town then you say (in 654) that you have three early wagoners (brass, t_w and ausuka) to examine after the honeypot.
This is actually an impressive thought-process, and awards you some small amount of townpoints!In post 801, Skygazer wrote:The thing is, if you're scum, you could easily tell your partners to not vote for me after your initial vote and catch some more potential mislynches for later through your "honeypot." This whole thing seems like a really convenient way for you to line up multiple mislynches through easily fakeable VCA's later in the game.
No, not true.In post 803, Taly wrote:Yeah. I totally got that you don't want my lynch D1.
I don't like that.
For someone that likes point that there's scum within multiple pools or groups of people,you definitely don't try to resolve your scumreads and you shelving me leaves a bad taste in my mouth.
So far duck hasn't given any obvious meta-tells to me, and therefore I'm worried they are coasting because they are afraid of slipping (again).In post 813, Raskolnikov wrote:WRT the worst / hitalt their game (sharing) does back up why duck would respect hitalt, he lockscummed him super early on. dont see this kind of reaction-style bait play there though it seems more just straight up metaing and tonal
interestingly hitalt hasn't made a hard judgment on duck yet though but seems to scumread him via association?
I actually explained this somewhat later by saying:In post 813, Raskolnikov wrote:Hitalt can you explain specifically why sky is probably scum btw?
Also maybe more on dramonic overall now though I did get you said you scumread 110
In post 126, HitAlt wrote:A very stock answer/quote thrown in an attempt to look townie.
Such a basic thing to ask "then why aren't you voting?"
But it reveals, in fact, that dramonic didn't really read what was said, and went for the appearances instead.
This puts my thoughts on profii very well to words.In post 817, the worst wrote:BTW Profii always sounds scummy early on which is why I've found it very productive to torment him early game and see if he spews himself.
he's been evasive here but otherwise fairly coherent? either his scumgames improved or he's town, putting it at like ~65% likely atm
They new?In post 819, the worst wrote:Hit, what do you make of the fact Sky is green af?
Nah just a Hanlon's razor moment. a lot of their sketchy elusive posting can easily be attributed to greenness and discomfort before scumminess.In post 822, HitAlt wrote:They new?In post 819, the worst wrote:Hit, what do you make of the fact Sky is green af?
Wet behind the ears?
Mightexplain being lynchbaity, but doesn't give a free pass for anything/everything.
Or are you trying to tell me you have a solid townread on them?