Page 33 of 102

Posted: Sat Jul 21, 2018 3:32 pm
by Fundamental Theorem
As I stated, a lot gut!scum!pings. It may be in part due to a bias of disagreeing with their reads though.

Posted: Sat Jul 21, 2018 3:33 pm
by Brian Skies
In post 800, Fundamental Theorem wrote:As I stated, a lot gut!scum!pings. It may be in part due to a bias of disagreeing with their reads though.
Okay, what's giving you gut!scum!pings?

Posted: Sat Jul 21, 2018 3:35 pm
by Fundamental Theorem
Their ISO in general.

Posted: Sat Jul 21, 2018 3:36 pm
by Brian Skies
Sorry I even asked.

Posted: Sat Jul 21, 2018 3:37 pm
by Fundamental Theorem
If there were specific posts, I'd probably point them out. Gut reads are a lot harder to explain, especially when they are consistent (rather than pertaining to individual posts.)

Posted: Sat Jul 21, 2018 3:41 pm
by Skygazer
FT, what don't you like about ?

Posted: Sat Jul 21, 2018 3:44 pm
by Fundamental Theorem
In post 477, rb wrote:how are you so sure they're both town
@Skygazer (Minor point, but still something to consider.)

Posted: Sat Jul 21, 2018 3:52 pm
by Skygazer
That's what I figured and that's what I figured DGB saw too

Just making sure you weren't just grabbing posts other people mentioned just to have them in there

Posted: Sat Jul 21, 2018 3:56 pm
by stungun0404
hmm, interesting dripping goofball’s stated only two reads — and they were a townread on me and fundamental theorem. and i guess a scumread on skygazer in , but i’m not quite sure why

given he was accurate on his tr of me (although at the time i kinda felt like it might be pocketing thus why i questioned it early on), maybe ft is town? just seems like we are reaching opposite conclusions on literally everything, and for that i’m more inclined towards him being either offbeat town or scum.

i do like the detail provided in fundamental theorem’s recent analyses, especially attached to the one provided in , in that he provided a look into his own thought processes in addition to offering a good dose of reactions to the content he investigated —> as opposed to merely just making comments. but i still got that gut feeling he’s trying to mislead us, and that’s difficult to take away, especially when it seemed there was so many percentages—when looking at his later analysis—that favored scum percentages (8 in the negative region, whereas 7 in the positive region).

Posted: Sat Jul 21, 2018 4:01 pm
by stungun0404
oh, quoted wrong post number, it was a reaction to 476. dgb scumread skygazer in

thanks to the above posts for helping me put that together!

Posted: Sat Jul 21, 2018 4:02 pm
by rb
In post 651, MariaR wrote:
In post 549, RadiantCowbells wrote:if one of them is scum

then maybe it's optimal to save the town but not really required, 1 for 1 is fine

or even worse we could save the town in the pair instead of the scum statistically 50% of the time which is no bueno at all

if they're both scum which I don't see as literally impossible, it massively behooves us to lynch them both today

the ends some people seem to be playing to are strange.
In post 550, RadiantCowbells wrote:and frankly we do get information from both flipping town, we get to look through peoples reactions and try to decipher which are scum reactions to a fucking field day for them.
Post's like this is why I feel RC is scum
why because they're accurate?

Posted: Sat Jul 21, 2018 4:03 pm
by rb
In post 808, stungun0404 wrote:hmm, interesting dripping goofball’s stated only two reads — and they were a townread on me and fundamental theorem. and i guess a scumread on skygazer in , but i’m not quite sure why

given he was accurate on his tr of me (although at the time i kinda felt like it might be pocketing thus why i questioned it early on), maybe ft is town? just seems like we are reaching opposite conclusions on literally everything, and for that i’m more inclined towards him being either offbeat town or scum.

i do like the detail provided in fundamental theorem’s recent analyses, especially attached to the one provided in , in that he provided a look into his own thought processes in addition to offering a good dose of reactions to the content he investigated —> as opposed to merely just making comments. but i still got that gut feeling he’s trying to mislead us, and that’s difficult to take away, especially when it seemed there was so many percentages—when looking at his later analysis—that favored scum percentages (8 in the negative region, whereas 7 in the positive region).
standard DGB day 1 play

Posted: Sat Jul 21, 2018 4:04 pm
by rb
hi papa zito

r u sad

Posted: Sat Jul 21, 2018 4:07 pm
by Toogeloo
In post 733, Fundamental Theorem wrote:Toogeloo --> "Like, can we still vote for a lynch, and the duel is just a
mob day lynch
?" --> What kind of question is this?
I meant that to say "mob day vig."

Nothing else I really feel like adding except that too many people getting slide by with that "neither" vote still. Yay for lack of accountability.

Posted: Sat Jul 21, 2018 4:09 pm
by stungun0404
In post 787, Fundamental Theorem wrote:UNOFFICIAL VOTECOUNT:

neither (12): Gammagooey, RadiantCowbells, Firebringer, rb, UnrealSeal, Fundamental Theorem, the worst, Skygazer, Gamma Emerald, Porkens, Papa Zito, Creature
Katsuki (5): MariaR, Katsuki, Brian Skies, BlueBloodedToffee, Fate
Firebringer (5): stungun0404, Toogeloo, Spiffeh, Antihero, Garmr

Not Voting (6): Vecna, Princess Celestia, Lady Lambdadelta, dramonic, neither, Prof Fridays

With 27 alive, it takes 14 to lynch.
how many votes are needed to switch the tide in favor of a player? 8? yeah, i don’t see that happening in a day.

VOTE: neither

Posted: Sat Jul 21, 2018 4:11 pm
by rb
oh DGB is dead

lol

Posted: Sat Jul 21, 2018 4:12 pm
by rb
In post 813, Toogeloo wrote:
In post 733, Fundamental Theorem wrote:Toogeloo --> "Like, can we still vote for a lynch, and the duel is just a
mob day lynch
?" --> What kind of question is this?
I meant that to say "mob day vig."

Nothing else I really feel like adding except that too many people getting slide by with that "neither" vote still. Yay for lack of accountability.
do you not think that people's reasons for picking the vote they pick is accountability?

Posted: Sat Jul 21, 2018 4:12 pm
by stungun0404
@all: neither is L-1

Posted: Sat Jul 21, 2018 4:15 pm
by rb
i just don't agree that the only thing that matters here is what vote someone picks. say we lynch one, then they flip town, and we target the wagon that lynched the 1 (naturally this is what always happens) assuming scum are on it.

then it turns out they're actually both town? oops, spent a bunch of day phases chasing nothing i guess. flip both, see who actually has decent motive for what they voted

fwiw, i think you're town even tho you're wrong about this

Posted: Sat Jul 21, 2018 4:15 pm
by rb
er that was @toogeloo i thought i hit quote

Posted: Sat Jul 21, 2018 4:17 pm
by rb
and that's just a worst case 'both are town'

when actually i think katsuki is likely scum, and firebringer i dunno if i can ever become un-paranoid that he's gambiting scum because he's the kind of player i'd believe would do this

Posted: Sat Jul 21, 2018 4:20 pm
by Brian Skies
VOTE: Neither

Not because I wanted to lynch Cupcake, but because the game must go on.

Posted: Sat Jul 21, 2018 4:26 pm
by Firebringer
my final words are that MariaR needs to be in a duel tomorrow.
GL town.

Posted: Sat Jul 21, 2018 4:29 pm
by stungun0404
In post 822, Firebringer wrote:my final words are that MariaR needs to be in a duel tomorrow.
GL town.
duel-y noted :wink:

Posted: Sat Jul 21, 2018 4:31 pm
by SpyreX
Official Duel Count


neither
(14): Gammagooey, RadiantCowbells, Firebringer, rb, UnrealSeal, Fundamental Theorem, the worst, Skygazer, Gamma Emerald, Porkens, Papa Zito, Creature, stungun0404, Brian Skies
Katsuki
(4): MariaR, Katsuki, BlueBloodedToffee, Fate
Firebringer
(4): Toogeloo, Spiffeh, Antihero, Garmr

Not Voting
(6): Vecna, Princess Celestia, Lady Lambdadelta, dramonic, neither, Prof Fridays

With 27 alive, it takes 14 to lynch.

NEITHER WINS. Please Hold.