Mafiascum.net

In post 731, Invisibility wrote:

In post 655, Nero Cain wrote:

In post 650, Skygazer wrote:on what you thought would be an easy vote

Why do so many people whine about being mislynch bait?

dislike this post also on page 28

Why would that be scummy?

In post 748, mastina wrote:Because different people not posting means different things for those different people.

Sure but it was early game and I felt like it was too early to differentiate between scum that was lurking and players that just hadn't posted yet.

In post 761, Gamma Emerald wrote:Screw you, I was working on a wall post when the topic got locked and now I have to redo it

y r u always so angry?

-If Mastina is outted scum then why isn't your vote there?

Furthermore, mastina, as I know her, would go ballistic on me for trying to lol-vig her. The fact she had done no such thing concerns me.

Gamma, no

Wheme pulling scumreads out of his arse is a very bad thing

Idk why I’m always so angry
Maybe it’s just the easiest emotion to express
Tbh I do have irl anger issues so that could be it too
PEdit: Wheme’s reads may be bad but imo they’re Town indicative
Don’t like that you tried to shoot my read down implicitly there

In post 800, Nero Cain wrote:

In post 731, Invisibility wrote:

In post 655, Nero Cain wrote:

In post 650, Skygazer wrote:on what you thought would be an easy vote

Why do so many people whine about being mislynch bait?

dislike this post also on page 28

Why would that be scummy?

dismissing what was actually not that bad a post in a vacuum
actually wait what was the case
eh nah i still think you're town but it wasnt like dismissing the point in a way that was like actually good? like actually with a real counterpoint

Also @Nero I think mastina is right about inactivity meaning different things for different people, like my Wh4t scumread shows.

Has Vecna ever faked a post restriction as scum?

Implicitly? No. I'm quite directly saying Wheme is scum here

In post 808, jjh927 wrote:Implicitly? No. I'm quite directly saying Wheme is scum here

Not there no. You call it bad but not scum. Bad != scum.

In post 806, Gamma Emerald wrote:Also @Nero I think mastina is right about inactivity meaning different things for different people, like my Wh4t scumread shows.

I absolutely agree. I'm just saying that in such an early phase of the game differentiating between scum that's lurking and town that just hasn't posted yet seems like a futile endeavor.

In post 793, mastina wrote:

In post 782, Wh4t wrote:

In post 780, mastina wrote:You, as town. Having a modifier that helps you when gladiated.
Is evidence corroborating my claim. Of being unable to gladiate anyone except for town.
Because if you are town.
And I am town.
I could only succeed when using it on you.

A townie having a gladiator modifier may make your claim legit but it on no way confirms you as town.

I don't recall stating it confirmed me as town.
I said it confirmed my role is what I claimed it to be.

Who's the one stretching now, mate?

It's implicit when you say your role only works if you're both town.

I read your wall and it's pretty meh. I still don't understand how your read has "drastically changed"?

In post 796, Invisibility wrote:for slayers gambit claim

Why is that scummy to you?

its fake

In post 812, Wh4t wrote:

In post 796, Invisibility wrote:for slayers gambit claim

Why is that scummy to you?

Because it’s a fucking retcon

wait lemme see if im getting this straight

mastina is scummy because she called you scummy and you're doing slayer's gambit

thats btw

In post 800, Nero Cain wrote:W4at-If Mastina is outted scum then why isn't your vote there?

Because I like where my vote is currently, on you no less. And I'm dramatic in my pushing but I am more concerned with determining her alignment before changing my vote.

In post 816, Invisibility wrote:mastina is scummy because she called you scummy and you're doing slayer's gambit

Yes...that's how the gambit works...

but that makes zero sense

someone seeing something scummy and then disliking something scummy is just as likely to be town or scum

In post 809, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 808, jjh927 wrote:Implicitly? No. I'm quite directly saying Wheme is scum here

Not there no. You call it bad but not scum. Bad != scum.

Yeah except I've called him scum earlier for the exact same reason

In post 814, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 812, Wh4t wrote:

In post 796, Invisibility wrote:for slayers gambit claim

Why is that scummy to you?

Because it’s a fucking retcon

So gamma you scumread me for low posting right?

In post 821, Invisibility wrote:someone seeing something scummy and then disliking something scummy is just as likely to be town or scum

Hence the follow up push...