Mafiascum.net

Slow down on clemency

We're using the full time

As if he’ll defend himself by releasing the pressure of votes

There's 10 people in the game to talk to

I'm fine to play the slow game

In post 798, scum reading wrote:I think the better question is why would you say explanations are scum as a town. Should we all vote according to our guts?

What kind of question is this? I say explanations are scummy as town because it's what I think as town.

To be clear, I'm not saying town don't have reasons for their reads/behaviors. They obviously do as a natural result of scumhunting. I'm just saying that town don't explain all their reads/behaviors, whereas scum sometimes explain too much to make sure their reads/behaviors are defensible.

If you're town, do you post all the reasons behind your reads/behaviors? And if you're scum fabricating "townie reasons," wouldn't you want to post those reasons in the thread to make sure your reads/behaviors are defensible?

What's your read on Fusco, Auro?

No read on Fusco. What's yours?

Scum.

I only got the impression he was kinda coasting by, I need him to post more before I can sort him with any confidence.

I'm losing my confidence in auro town for some reason

In post 810, RadiantCowbells wrote:I'm losing my confidence in auro town for some reason

If you can figure out why, do tell.

In post 805, Shoshin wrote:

In post 798, scum reading wrote:I think the better question is why would you say explanations are scum as a town. Should we all vote according to our guts?

What kind of question is this? I say explanations are scummy as town because it's what I think as town.

To be clear, I'm not saying town don't have reasons for their reads/behaviors. They obviously do as a natural result of scumhunting. I'm just saying that town don't explain all their reads/behaviors, whereas scum sometimes explain too much to make sure their reads/behaviors are defensible.

If you're town, do you post all the reasons behind your reads/behaviors? And if you're scum fabricating "townie reasons," wouldn't you want to post those reasons in the thread to make sure your reads/behaviors are defensible?

How do you even determine when someone is “taking it too far”? I do leave a textblock of explanations when I make a case against someone as town. If anything, I’d say scum distort the reality of events and choose to pick on bits of that case to make the case look faulty, when they aren’t really addressing the whole idea of the accusation.

It was the 2* description of fuscoscos as kinda coasting by

Not sure why it's such a huge ping but it is

How is this helping you sort me, SR? The point is that I actually think this as town.

In post 813, RadiantCowbells wrote:It was the 2* description of fuscoscos as kinda coasting by

Why is this scummy? Do you not think he is?

You think Auro/Fusco team?

That's what I was thinking yea

I'd always lynch Fusco before I lynched Auro.

I'm not voting Auro today.

Auro/Fusco team because Auro's null on Fusco, and gets the impression he's coasting but that there's not enough content to sort him?

Auro/Volxen/Fuscoscos maybe?

In post 821, Auro wrote:Auro/Fusco team because Auro's null on Fusco, and gets the impression he's coasting but that there's not enough content to sort him?

It was the reuse of the exact same phrasing with no attempt to follow up.

Nah, not Volxen. Auro/Fusco/Demon.