Urap does have a point: strange to vote this when you gave intent on Insom.
Reading is hard.
This is what I said.
In post 194, GrandWazoo wrote:Declare intent to put Insomnia L-1. What this world is coming to
Alacrity is an enigma. I don't like enigmas. Stuff like their unvote and 142 ping me.
Urap and Nomnom conveniently ignore the second sentence of this post. My vote on Alacrity is not "strange" as it only reiterates and reinforces a pre-existing read. If y'all could stop misrepping me that would be great.
this post shades both URAP and nom, and considering that URAP flipped town I feel that nom is more likely than not town here.
In post 364, GrandWazoo wrote:Ok I'll drop the alt business since it seems NAI here.
see above post, groups nom/URAP
this ones a lot weaker, especially because its simply a request, but basically same as above
In post 432, GrandWazoo wrote:I'm wondering if scum have some weird mecha where they get rewarded for double voting. Alacrity and NM have both done it. This doesn't happen by accident on the same wagon.
And no Urap I didn't think I was hammered. I may be a prick but I'm not an idiot lol
this shade on alacrity and NM gives them both town points
I agree that the flow of this game feels odd, but the argument that it means this wagon must be scum driven because I'm on it is not compelling fmpov (lol)
If not GW, I think I want Eragon, Jay, or Locke today
My townbloc is Urap, pp, nomnom and MCK. Scum Alac, Locke and Roster. Everyone else null.
going by rules of 3(or 4, as rumour has it) theres 1 scum in (URAP, PP, nom, MCK) and no more than 1 scum in (Alac, locke, roster)
going by reads that means 1 scum in (MCK) and no more than one 1 scum in (Locke, roster)
plus the nulls but that comes after.
In post 655, GrandWazoo wrote:MCK: You should share your theories now. They may be rejected or mocked, but at least they will generate discussion. Apathy really is killing this game.
Talking to someone telling them to generate discussion with theories. could be w/w
In post 738, GrandWazoo wrote:Finally got a chance to read Eragon catch up. Reminds me of when I'd turn in a massive term paper 2 hrs before it's due, knowing the prof had neither time nor desire to read the damn thing. It's got lots of content, and lots of footnotes, it must be good!
Alas, his SR on me centers almost entirely on the Alacrity-alt business, which I dropped literally 15 pages ago and have no intention of revisiting. Is this a scummy push? More to the point, would scum continue to bang on at length about this, thereby drawing unwanted attention? Or is this more likely to come from a bullheaded town? I mean, I ask myself this all the time and it's usually the latter.
As I explained elsewhere, "Riff" means a joke in this context.
It was Nathan Hale, not Nathaniel Greene, who said "I only regret that I have but one life to lose for my country."
I agree with most of these townreads, with the exception of Elsa and NM. Evidently to get townread by Eragon your playstyle must either be "fun" or YOLO. NM is unlynchable it seems. Elsa's ISO is really bad.
VOTE: Elsa
this vote on elsa trying to swing a CFD also looks good on elsa
town spew-Nom, alacrity,
soft town spew-NM, elsa
likely scum-TMCK
more than likely one scum in (locke, roster), assuming GW was soft distancing from one partner while scumreading two town
rule of 3's
How is Ala confirmed? Also high five for hanging scum day 1. Sad that the basically cop died n1 in return though.
Anyone got neighborized by URAP?)
have you not read GW's posts?
i shouldn't have to explain this
Posted: Sun Mar 31, 2019 5:45 pm
by Eragon
ok, so unless GW put 4 town in his townblock, TMCK basically has to be scum
i townread PP and nomnom hard
Urap is dead town
all thats left ist TMCK
VOTE: themilkcartonkid
Mod note: Vote has been edited from 'TMCK' to 'themilkcartonkid'.
Posted: Sun Mar 31, 2019 5:49 pm
by Eragon
TOWN BLOCK
Eragon
Alacrity
Nigh before townblock
Pengu
Nom
Town
NM
Elsa
One scum in
Roster
Locke
Scum
TMCK
Posted: Sun Mar 31, 2019 5:51 pm
by Eragon
if anyone really wants me to analyze how alacrity is confirmed town, i will
but if you even just skim GW's iso its blindingly obvious they are never w/w
Posted: Sun Mar 31, 2019 6:02 pm
by Eragon
also
milk going
"but the claiiiiim"
and in his next post hammering shows lack of real progression
Posted: Sun Mar 31, 2019 6:45 pm
by Eragon
I think that i can fly
that i can touch the sky
Posted: Sun Mar 31, 2019 9:15 pm
by Locke113
Scum is either Eragon or milk or both. Despite claiming intent to join the wagon multiple times and saying he scumread GW, Eragon didn't put GW at L-1 nor did he hammer. Seen scum pull this trick before were they claimed intent to hammer without much time left on the clock to try and wait out the timer. And the whole GW pushing the alac wagon as an alternative to Eragon's with some piss poor reasoning, even though he claimed he still scumread Insomnia/Eragon.
Milk did join the wagon, multiple times, but kept trying to undermine it or start different wagons to draw attention away, such as trying to vote up Alac and The Penguin of all people. Also even when it was clear there was no way GW wasn't getting out of day 1 alive no matter what he claimed, he still tried to use the excuse of waiting for the claim to not hammer, which if he had been let off for, GW could have just never claimed as there wasn't much time left.
VOTE: Eragon
Posted: Mon Apr 01, 2019 12:40 am
by themilkcartonkid
Alacrity conftown. I noticed that town split into pairs. Lock and roster, me and nom, urap and alac, pp and Elsa. N-m grandwazoo and eragon never really had anyone they gelled with. I dont think alac kills the only one who was agreeing with their reads