Posted: Sun Sep 15, 2019 7:26 am
VOTE: Lady Eventide
-Tana
-Tana
https://forum.mafiascum-staging.net/
I feel like if you actually cared you'd have read, in which case you'd see there's more nuance then your generalistic assumption.In post 788, Lady Eventide wrote:@Gamma Emerald:
Nope I didn't. Why should I? It looks like a mess of AtE at a skim. What useful information do you expect me to extract from it?
<3In post 798, Dannflor wrote:I had to
Sure, fine.In post 794, Titus wrote:Lmao. The Goddaughter comment is about my literal Goddaughter.
Evaluating wagon states is scummy. Lmfao.
This game uses hammersIn post 1, GuyInFreezer wrote:If the deadline is reached before the lynch has reached, the day will end with No Lynch, unless mentioned otherwise.
Hi. My name is Titus. I'm a VCAaholic.In post 803, Lady Eventide wrote:Sure, fine.In post 794, Titus wrote:Lmao. The Goddaughter comment is about my literal Goddaughter.
Evaluating wagon states is scummy. Lmfao.
Wagon states: This early? Yes, yes it is. I'm pretty sure this isn't a hammer game?
- Eva
I don’t know if you’re really bad town here or scum.In post 779, Lady Eventide wrote:In post 777, gameplay506 wrote:Why LLD over Sailor?In post 775, Lady Eventide wrote:Cool.
VOTE: Lady Lambdadelta
I'm noticing that despite acknowledging my arguments, you haven't actually done anything about them.
-ESailor hasn't responded and seems inactive. LLD did in fact respond to my earlier post. -E
Which head made this post?In post 299, Tana and Ephraim wrote:The fact that both LLD and Katsuki have expressed intent to lurk is beyond concerning and I don't think either slot should be left alive past even day 1 if they are lurking.
Hi TitusIn post 805, Titus wrote:Hi. My name is Titus. I'm a VCAaholic.In post 803, Lady Eventide wrote:Sure, fine.In post 794, Titus wrote:Lmao. The Goddaughter comment is about my literal Goddaughter.
Evaluating wagon states is scummy. Lmfao.
Wagon states: This early? Yes, yes it is. I'm pretty sure this isn't a hammer game?
- Eva
Everyone: Hi Titus.
That was E, all untagged posts are EIn post 807, Katsuki wrote:Which head made this post?In post 299, Tana and Ephraim wrote:The fact that both LLD and Katsuki have expressed intent to lurk is beyond concerning and I don't think either slot should be left alive past even day 1 if they are lurking.
What? And we’re town here. Do you even have a reason for voting us?
RC didIn post 807, Katsuki wrote:Which head made this post?In post 299, Tana and Ephraim wrote:The fact that both LLD and Katsuki have expressed intent to lurk is beyond concerning and I don't think either slot should be left alive past even day 1 if they are lurking.
Her initial push on you was a motivation read which I think is a town first mentality and was early enough that it didn't seem like scum trying to set up a mislynch and more like town solving.In post 814, gameplay506 wrote:Can anyone townreading Titus tell me why btw
*I read Dr. Dollitle's read on her which I disagree with and that is the only explained titus tr I can recall rn*
Pedit:I do believe so as well, senshi
Without going all the way back to figure out what the original read was, where do you stand on her now?In post 820, Sailor Senshi wrote:I might have been wrong on Pops yesterday.
LE and Katsuki are pinging me the most rn but I’ll stick with Shiro’s LE vote. She keeps rapid fire voting slots all over the place with the silliest reasoning. I remember not liking her early posting. Katsuki’s vote just seemed opportunistic.In post 815, gameplay506 wrote:The vote piling there when the argument began did seem like people going for the low-hanging fruit and I was very eh on that
I'm very eh on people still voting/atacking you for that argument