Page 33 of 224
Posted: Sun Sep 08, 2019 12:11 pm
by Garmr
In post 798, Elements wrote: In post 797, Garmr wrote: In post 789, Elements wrote: In post 788, Garmr wrote:Because it is kinda weird that he used watcher/tracker combo as the investigative options when there's potential for others like cop or hider. Kinda like it's tmi.
Watcher/tracker is like an opposite duo. Can you think of another?
Why would there be a duo investigative role like tracker/watcher none of the roles have been revealed?
it was an example of two investigative roles. I picked those two because they fit together. It was only to illustrate the point there might be 2 investigative roles.
Hmm I am going to drop this after some thought since Scum wouldn't think there is duo investigative roles with just a ninja. I thought of the possibility that you were scum with a ninja on your team fishing with the knowledge of a tracker or watcher but the fact you think both maybe in the game at the same time gives me a different conclusion.
Posted: Sun Sep 08, 2019 12:12 pm
by Carcalilly
Miller is a joke, man
Posted: Sun Sep 08, 2019 12:14 pm
by Elements
Or its that what they want you to think...
Posted: Sun Sep 08, 2019 12:55 pm
by Judge Joseph Dredd
In post 790, Rick Dalton wrote:I’m an Informed Miller, there are no loyal modifiers in this game, and there are 4 scum
Really? Well I dunno about the modifier and I dunno about the # of scum, but I am informed that there are no informed roles in this game! How 'bout that?
WAIT! It says right here in my role PM "Beware Rick Dalton, for he's the unltimate BS'er that ever existed". /End of quote.
Posted: Sun Sep 08, 2019 12:58 pm
by Judge Joseph Dredd
Usually I'd be saying something like "What's the point? They're gonna get a guilty anyway", but for some odd reason I don't even believe the Miller claim from RD (who else claimed Miller?)
Posted: Sun Sep 08, 2019 12:59 pm
by YOUAREGREAT
@anyone who townreads tchill13
why?
Posted: Sun Sep 08, 2019 1:17 pm
by Judge Joseph Dredd
@Rick: I:m sorry if I spoiled a gambit of yours, but in this player list I fear they might actually be inclined top be misled by your gambits
Posted: Sun Sep 08, 2019 1:21 pm
by Tchill13
Why do you SR me? I fos'd you and bam I'm scum.
Posted: Sun Sep 08, 2019 1:21 pm
by Tchill13
In post 806, Judge Joseph Dredd wrote:@Rick: I:m sorry if I spoiled a gambit of yours, but in this player list I fear they might actually be inclined top be misled by your gambits
This player list should know what's up as far as his gambits go and likelihood of them. Why do you think this?
Posted: Sun Sep 08, 2019 1:29 pm
by Cliff Booth
What is a loyal modifier? Afraid I haven't heard of that one.
Posted: Sun Sep 08, 2019 1:30 pm
by Judge Joseph Dredd
I'm not sure Hectic does?? For one. In fact, I dunno how well Hopkirk, Hectic, bob, Elements, Billy, YAG, Sharon, ELA or Skellen know Rick Dalton. Some of them may, but I don't know that. Some of them I don't even know myself.
Posted: Sun Sep 08, 2019 1:31 pm
by Judge Joseph Dredd
Can only target same alignment. If the target is not of the same alignment they reflexively Roleblocked.
Posted: Sun Sep 08, 2019 1:45 pm
by Elements
In post 810, Judge Joseph Dredd wrote:I'm not sure Hectic does?? For one. In fact, I dunno how well Hopkirk, Hectic, bob, Elements, Billy, YAG, Sharon, ELA or Skellen know Rick Dalton. Some of them may, but I don't know that. Some of them I don't even know myself.
Hectic probably knows more then I do. And I don't.
Posted: Sun Sep 08, 2019 1:47 pm
by Elements
In post 803, Judge Joseph Dredd wrote:
Really? Well I dunno about the modifier and I dunno about the # of scum, but I am informed that there are no informed roles in this game! How 'bout that?
That could only be a neutral role
Posted: Sun Sep 08, 2019 2:34 pm
by Billy Pilgrim
In post 758, Hopkirk wrote:@Billy: I notice you didn’t seem to respond to my argument that if town didn’t get coloured pms then neither did scum, so it’s not possible to ‘townslip’ based on pm colour. Do you still count the ‘townslip’ as a townslip?
@Cliff: If you got a problem with me and you’re feeling too brave to hide behind your buddy Rick like usual then I’m right here.
UNVOTE: Judge
In post 754, Garmr wrote: In post 741, Judge Joseph Dredd wrote:??Kop
??Cliff Booth
??Sharon Tate
??EeveeLution Army
??Fish Monger
??rosterfoster
??Garmr
??bob3141
??Skellen
This is a list of players that are not actually playing this game yet. If any pf them has something to contribute it's better to say it no rather than after a wagon had formed on you.
I went and quickly skimmed your post couldn't find like any scum reads only town reads. Do you think the entire scum read is in this list?
This question feels odd.
Sorry, did you find nothing to comment on in the 500 posts between where you were at and this?
VOTE: Skellen
-Kirk
That seems like a good point. I don't usually put much weight on slips, this one just stuck out at me in the moment. And I didn't even think about how the lack of color means that it couldn't be a townslip.
Posted: Sun Sep 08, 2019 2:40 pm
by Billy Pilgrim
In post 786, bob3141 wrote: In post 749, Billy Pilgrim wrote:Judges recent posts are making me like that slot more. I think I've already said I like tchill's slot. I'm not sure why YAzg keeps voting my townreads, but it's definitely making me more skeptical of her slot.
My gut is telling me that this is simply you trying to back track on a push. While also using it to stear towards another. Makes me your scum thinking after Judges claims it would be to risky to push there. With you instead hoping to stear instead to another player that has been pushing him. All the while making a point of no longer scum reading him. So what made you like his slot more, that would of been the case before?
I just dont get why the first part was even posted. And on the later half care to tell us why YAzg pushes on those players you townread makes you as you put it skeptical of her slot. So why a scum leaning over a leaning toward town making misguided pushes. And what in the posts makes you feel its not genuine scum hunting
Your the other player that has pinged me so far. There is just this uneasy feeling im getting on your slot.
Did I really push Judge? I said there wasnt what I would consider game solvey content there, then it changed. If you don't see a difference in Judge's content then I guess this makes sense, but it started to look alot more like sorting and much less memey. And I posted that part because I had answered a question from Carcalilly about his slot earlier.
I liked the way she came in the game, and immediately started sorting. I probably read too much into the comment about the green pm. But if someone is scumreading your townreads, that is tough to square. I didn't say I'm scumreading her, I said it's making me more skeptical of the slot, which means I need to re-read it with a fresh eye.
Posted: Sun Sep 08, 2019 3:30 pm
by EeveeLution Army
In post 790, Rick Dalton wrote:I’m an Informed Miller, there are no loyal modifiers in this game, and there are 4 scum
The actual hell lmao, i was legit thinking there would be an informed townie lol
Posted: Sun Sep 08, 2019 3:32 pm
by EeveeLution Army
Loyal= can only target people of ur faction
Unloyal= can only target people not of ur faction.
Posted: Sun Sep 08, 2019 3:45 pm
by Gamma Emerald
I'm already liking him but he's still goodposting
Posted: Sun Sep 08, 2019 3:48 pm
by Gamma Emerald
Why? If they're inno results it's from town, otherwise you don't know. Like what's the point?
Posted: Sun Sep 08, 2019 6:18 pm
by Rick Dalton
I have no clue where scum is
Posted: Sun Sep 08, 2019 9:17 pm
by EeveeLution Army
Inspecting a miller claim is wasting the inspect, just decide if you believe it not
Posted: Sun Sep 08, 2019 9:38 pm
by Tchill13
Have you met my pals skellen or YOUAREGREAT? Let me introduce you to them.
Posted: Sun Sep 08, 2019 11:55 pm
by Kop
If cop did check the miller claim and actually gets a guilty, we're no further forward to the truth, because that claimed miller still could be scum. It would create a lot more WIFOM than anything else because we're left with a debate on either believing the claim or lynching said claim.
I also don't get why we are discussing what possible roles are out there. Rolefishing is scummy.
Posted: Sun Sep 08, 2019 11:57 pm
by Kop
In post 779, Carcalilly wrote:I'm guessing that there's only so much we can talk about day 1, even though for a large game 32 pages isn't much.
I expected us to lynch someone soon but either scums playing real good or the lynchbait is laying low.
Wanna predict the nightkill? Do you think scum will be cautious of jjd's whatever-the-fuck-cop-claim? Or will they realize it's a joke? Or is it?
What are we going to achieve by trying to predict the nightkill? You do realise that there is most likely going to be more than one kill.