Mafiascum.net

In post 794, Datisi wrote:

In post 787, alimdia wrote:However he just made 1 post and then dipped.

Oh yeah, was this a "positive" or "negative" context?

I'm waiting on Wicked's defence but it was supposed to be a positive for him. In that that's the only post we are judging him off on.

In post 795, Datisi wrote:Luca, something very weird is happening.

I agree with almost everything that's come out of your mouth so far.

Are you sure its not because he just said he agreed with you

In post 800, alimdia wrote:

In post 794, Datisi wrote:

In post 787, alimdia wrote:However he just made 1 post and then dipped.

Oh yeah, was this a "positive" or "negative" context?

I'm waiting on Wicked's defence but it was supposed to be a positive for him. In that that's the only post we are judging him off on.

Can you clarify this a bit further? I'm not sure what you mean - do you think it was a good post? A NAI one?

In post 800, alimdia wrote:

In post 795, Datisi wrote:Luca, something very weird is happening.

I agree with almost everything that's come out of your mouth so far.

Are you sure its not because he just said he agreed with you

Yes, yes I actually am.

I've just gone through his ISO again. And while sure, it is small, I don't think he has a post I disagree with? (Other than 22 perhaps.)

It's odd, but I don't feel a pockety vibe either. Almost eerie.

I feel kinda bad about yesterday now

you should

but more importantly

are you still tunneling?

Why is wimpy!slot town?

I’m not sure if I’m tunnelling or not that’s the problem

what is your definition of tunnelling exactly?

I think there were legit reasons to SR him which were there before things escalated but idk if those are explainable in a world where wimpy was town and I was clashing with him because I find him objectionable rather than bc he was scum

Plus now I feel like I’m gonna struggle to read him objectively in the reread

In post 806, Datisi wrote:what is your definition of tunnelling exactly?

Me or icon?

Getting locked into the belief that someone is scum and losing the ability to engage with them beyond conf!biasing everything they do/say as explainable through scum motivations

In post 805, Menalque wrote:I’m not sure if I’m tunnelling or not that’s the problem

You, I was asking because of this

Did you read the rest of the thread? Opinion on other slots?

Hey guys,

Briefly checking in here during my lunch break. Had I known that this micro game I signed up for would be the fastest moving game I’ve ever been a part of, I would and should’ve announced V/LA yesterday. I had a few hours to read through the thread but didn’t have any time to contribute anything. In general, I don’t like posting when I’m not caught up.

Ico, you vote me for ‘of all the things to comment on’ I only asked Wimpy about his experience. Just because it’s the only thing I commented on doesn’t mean it’s the only thing I wanted to comment on. It’s simply Wimpy’s experience was the thing I was most curious about after reading the first few pages (and I’m not the only person that was interested in his answer).

I’ll explain that more and contribute more of my thoughts/questions when i get home.

Menalque, you seemed very confident in your Wimpy scumread. Have you ever been that confident so early in a game before?

In post 289, Menalque wrote:Wicked just FYI I’m expecting more posting from you this game even if it’s just like passing thoughts, bc I know you were often active in the scum pt in C9++ even when u weren’t posting in game

Why are you telling me this? Wouldn’t it have been better to wait and see how active I am rather than telling me your expectation right from the get go?

And fwiw, there’s a huge difference between posting in a scum pt and posting in a game thread.

Alright I'm digging this, the game might not be completely fucked.

Wicked, when yiu get time to read/catch up, can you tell me why was Wimpy's experience the one thing you felt like commenting at the time?

In post 809, Datisi wrote:

In post 805, Menalque wrote:I’m not sure if I’m tunnelling or not that’s the problem

You, I was asking because of this

Did you read the rest of the thread? Opinion on other slots?

Yeah but it’s kind of conditional on stuff

Atm I’d say my lynchpool is (wimpy!slot, al-thingy #1, al-thingy #2, wicked) but depending on flips within that I would probably reevaluate my townreads

I think I get this confident in basically every game I play but I wouldn’t say my confidence level was ever over 65% on wimpy!scum

Which I know doesn’t look great but that’s how much he was pissing me off

Im hard townreading datisi and Luca

Emps is probably town

Icon is probably town with reservations and I need him to explain his progression on my slot

I’m town

Therefore scum in the other four

If wimpy!slot = scum then the solve is prob one of the al-slots

If wicked!town then I need to rethink my TRs probably

will catch up in a bit

In post 812, Datisi wrote:Wicked, when yiu get time to read/catch up, can you tell me why was Wimpy's experience the one thing you felt like commenting at the time?

You know, at first I said this was because I didn't have time to comment on anything else, but, thinking about it some more, there really wasn't much else to comment on. I asked Wimpy that question on page 11 - by that point 90% of the thread was you/Mena/Wimpy engaging in a very repetitive/circular conversation. So I don't really see what I neglected to comment on.

If I had had all the time in the world to post during my lunch break yesterday, I would have asked Mena the questions I asked him earlier today, I would have critiqued the game-state, and admitted that I was having trouble getting reads on any of you three by that point. (I still am to an extent)

ok catching up now

i was on page 22 or smth i think?

oh wow i was on pg 26 ok only 7 pgs to catch up on

In post 640, Wimpy wrote:Man this is so lazy. Menal lies and you can’t even bother to verify it? You instead side with him?

Please lynch me. Town has proven they don’t want to win so I’ll happily be the first casualty

woah perspective slipping

yayyy wimpy is AtEing and has "given up on playing the game" woah i never saw this coming

In post 644, Wimpy wrote:

In post 641, Datisi wrote:I mean you keep pushing bullshit about "having evidence" vs "thinking someome is scum" vs "thinking someone is scummy" but like

Bruh

He accused me of saying I voted you because I thought you were scum.

Did I say that? No

That’s the narrative he’s pushed. It’s a lie

you could have just said "oh i voted for pressure" instead of dragging it into a 20 page long fight but ok