Posted: Mon Nov 25, 2019 12:51 pm
Thanks
https://forum.mafiascum-staging.net/
I am not scumreading him just because I SR you, I seem to have forgotten to write this out but I also think you both could be scum individuallyIn post 697, Farkran wrote:I think i have already reacted to every claim so far, stating whether i believe/don't believe them and how i read them in terms of alignment. Feel free to ask me if i missed any.In post 607, Gamma Emerald wrote:My best guess to why you’d appraise us here (versus the scum PT, which I assume you are implying) is you just threw those up in instant reaction to the posts. If you would like to point out your other reactions to claims that would be nice, that way I could see if the pattern continuesIn post 570, Farkran wrote:Gamma's list and reasoning make sense, but i do have a question
Why would i try to appraise you and salamence in the day thread? It's not like you're going to answer that. Also, if anything, i have been consistent in 1. (slightly) townlean blast disc pickers; 2. declaring what i believed and what i didn't believe from all slots making a claim.
I can see your point about me and suji distancing, that may validate your vote on me. Could you expand on TL though? You mentioned weird interactions between me and him. Do you see that as distancing too, or is there anything else?
As for TL interactions, yeah those kinda look like distancing too but my thinking about the connection between you and TL is “they may or may not be scum together, I see nothing in favor of either possibility”. While with Suji there’s the stuff I mentioned.
So, i get that you are scumreading both me and TL, but you are only scumreading TL based on your assumption that i am scum, correct?
This is new, actually, I haven't formalized it like this before.In post 790, Farkran wrote:What slots have you proficently analyzed with this method?In post 785, Evenstar wrote:Legibility is "ability to read."In post 771, Alchemist21 wrote:What does legible vs illegible mean?In post 743, Evenstar wrote:How I Actually Sort:
Legible Town | Legible Scum
Illegible Town | Illegible Scum
High legibility reads look like flip-flopping back and forth between "definitely scum" and "definitely town.
Low-legibility reads look like fencesitting on "maybe town maybe scum idk."
Having a read move diagonally is a scumtell, because confidence and percieved alignment don't usually shift at the same time.
More precisely, did anyone fall guilty to such scumtell? Who? Where? How does this reflect in your readlist?
I want to understand what's going on in your head because i'd much rather try to work with you than against you - however i can't say i've been able to do it so far
You can see me just starting to edge towards the concept of "legibility" here, but as I was under pressure and had already gone on for like three paragraphs aboit the weird way I read games and my attempts to systematize it, I didn't want to keep yammering. Feel free to ask more questions if you want?Magical Mafia Evenstar wrote: I'm going to be blunt: Saying "I think this person is scum" or "I think this person is town" is more about the social aspect of the game to me than the solving part of the game. It's easy to say, and there are always reasons to scum or town read anyone. Interacting with information is easy and it's not a problem for most people to make up fake, consistent reads.
What it's not easy to do is generate information. And scum have to do that. They have to falsify continually. This is why I care more about the reasons for a read than the read itself; reads, to me, are just announcements of "I think this guy is on my team." Towny -> "My ally", Scummy -> "My enemy."
This may be an insane way of playing the game to some, but frankly there's no such thing as a universal scumtell/towntell. All I can do is force the wolves to keep producing content. Eventually, that's going to lead to someone fucking up.
… except of course that's not the complete picture. Because the other half of it is mirroring, empathy, understanding.
Anything you can directly point out here, or is this more of a general impression?In post 791, Severa wrote:All of Kerset's posting feels like the kind of things scum are more likely to post than town.
For a minute there I thought you were saying you were deliberately trying to cause confusion.In post 806, TemporalLich wrote:well at least I'm succeeding in causing confusion...
the scum shall not win, lest this timeline die...
I wasn't trying to but I accept the result that happened...In post 811, Alchemist21 wrote:For a minute there I thought you were saying you were deliberately trying to cause confusion.In post 806, TemporalLich wrote:well at least I'm succeeding in causing confusion...
the scum shall not win, lest this timeline die...
I have seriously considered him being a jester many times this game. I'm not all that sure what alignment he is, admittedly.In post 804, Evenstar wrote:@Severa, how do you know TL's not just incompetent? I'm having difficulty finding wolf motive beyond "spread chaos" in his current postings.
On reflection, I agree with this.In post 810, Severa wrote:Kerset scumread to me is more of a function of the things that are missing from his posting as opposed to what is actually there.
Boooo
Kerset, can you explain your progression on Gamma? Was she part of your scumreads or not at the time of the first quote? What happened in-between for her to make it up to above half of your readlist? I only see a lengthy exchange with Alchemist (which i think was NAI on the side of bad), some content about evenstar (which made sense but again, mostly NAI), a very weak and weird push against me (which is really bad given the reasoning provided).In post 721, Kerset wrote:Town
Bitmap
Salamen
Evenstar
Farkran
Gamma
Pops
Chemist
V&M
Suji
TL
Alchemist
Severa
Scum
I understand the theory behind the process, my question was more aimed at the results you're collecting from it. My problem with you in this game is that you seem to be too swingy - i.e. you voted half of the player list by now, and i didn't see any plausible conclusions about any of your targets so far. Your readlist are, by your admission and by evidence, pretty much bs at this point (i.e. you voted kerset shortly after this post of yours). I know you for your smart "tricks" to harm scum, and analyzing your early votes has never been a proficient way to measure your thoughts. Usually, after a while, this process produces valid reads, but i don't see any coming from you in this game. I am having trouble in determining where you are sincere and where you are reaction testing/pressuring people.In post 803, Evenstar wrote:
This is new, actually, I haven't formalized it like this before.
What Iwilldo, though, is quote myself in magical girls mafia:
You can see me just starting to edge towards the concept of "legibility" here, but as I was under pressure and had already gone on for like three paragraphs aboit the weird way I read games and my attempts to systematize it, I didn't want to keep yammering. Feel free to ask more questions if you want?Magical Mafia Evenstar wrote: I'm going to be blunt: Saying "I think this person is scum" or "I think this person is town" is more about the social aspect of the game to me than the solving part of the game. It's easy to say, and there are always reasons to scum or town read anyone. Interacting with information is easy and it's not a problem for most people to make up fake, consistent reads.
What it's not easy to do is generate information. And scum have to do that. They have to falsify continually. This is why I care more about the reasons for a read than the read itself; reads, to me, are just announcements of "I think this guy is on my team." Towny -> "My ally", Scummy -> "My enemy."
This may be an insane way of playing the game to some, but frankly there's no such thing as a universal scumtell/towntell. All I can do is force the wolves to keep producing content. Eventually, that's going to lead to someone fucking up.
… except of course that's not the complete picture. Because the other half of it is mirroring, empathy, understanding.
So, from my understanding of your 351 your scumlist is {TL, Alchemist, pops, farkran}? I'm not sure if i'm still in there, perhaps more of a nullscum?In post 815, Salamence20 wrote:If you have any questions directed to me ask me and Ill answer if I can