Page 33 of 165

Posted: Tue Jan 14, 2020 3:50 pm
by skitter30
Vote Count 1.8
gjt (3):
looker, joges, nicholai

SausasaurusRex (1):
kanna

ankamius (1):
flavor leaf

nicholai (1):
thefuzzylogic

nomnomnom (1):
gjt

invisibility (1):
non imh

non imh (1):
bob3141

not voting (4) :
SausasaurusRex, ankamius, invisibility, nomnomnom

With 13 alive, it takes seven to Lynch.

deadline:
(expired on 2020-01-20 06:30:00)

mod notes:

- joint mod iso

Posted: Tue Jan 14, 2020 3:52 pm
by joges
prodge

Also, I'm off all day tomorrow with very little interruptions, so if you'd like to schedule a conversation now is your chance.

Posted: Tue Jan 14, 2020 4:12 pm
by nomnomnom
me first me first

Posted: Tue Jan 14, 2020 9:01 pm
by Ankamius
In post 775, Nicholai wrote:right, wimpo's probably town. it was an overreaction but his tone read as genuine frustration. ank is a great replacement for that slot, she'll get some work done

omnom's frustration at Gjt seemed real, but could come from either alignment i believe. could definitely see scum genuinely frustrated at being scumread/questioned for such bizarre reasons. omnom, could i ask where your me/invis suspicions arise from?
Wait... are you somebody I know?

Posted: Tue Jan 14, 2020 9:03 pm
by Ankamius
In post 778, Nicholai wrote:
In post 725, Looker wrote:Do you TR ankamius like you TR wimpy?
i townread the slot, slight town pings from Ank calling omnom town in the way she did it but otherwise nothing on her
In post 745, Ankamius wrote:lmao nomnomnom is town

nice
i know it's slightly contradictory to read this post as town and then question it, but i'm TRing it's tone(?) rather than the read itself. why did you call omnom town after her interaction with gjt? can her frustration not come from scum?
Nom tends to struggle keeping her tone and thought processes consistent with each other as scum

She's already showing consistency

Posted: Tue Jan 14, 2020 9:16 pm
by nomnomnom
Ank how do you feel about wagoning invis with me

Posted: Tue Jan 14, 2020 9:35 pm
by Ankamius

Posted: Tue Jan 14, 2020 9:51 pm
by Ankamius
btw how important is it that I read the entire thread

just the little I've seen indicates there's minimal anything I can get from it

Posted: Tue Jan 14, 2020 11:30 pm
by Looker
@nomnomnom:
You have no reads on anyone and are voting Invis because he's lolrandom. Is this correct? Also, apart from calling him a dumbass, you don't lean either town or scum on Gjt?

Posted: Tue Jan 14, 2020 11:39 pm
by nomnomnom
In post 808, Looker wrote:
@nomnomnom:
You have no reads on anyone
Excuse me

Posted: Tue Jan 14, 2020 11:42 pm
by nomnomnom
That whole post is inter-dimensional levels of misreps and it's like you read none of my posts lol

Posted: Wed Jan 15, 2020 12:11 am
by Looker
So I'm assuming it's incorrect? Two posts. Still vague. No answers.

Posted: Wed Jan 15, 2020 12:16 am
by nomnomnom
Just read my posts please it's not like I have a 300 posts iso

Posted: Wed Jan 15, 2020 12:22 am
by Looker
So I
was
correct, because that's the impression I got from reading your ISO before I asked. Thank you.

Posted: Wed Jan 15, 2020 12:24 am
by nomnomnom
Are you fucking kidding me, are you for real
In post 780, nomnomnom wrote:
In post 775, Nicholai wrote:right, wimpo's probably town. it was an overreaction but his tone read as genuine frustration. ank is a great replacement for that slot, she'll get some work done

omnom's frustration at Gjt seemed real, but could come from either alignment i believe. could definitely see scum genuinely frustrated at being scumread/questioned for such bizarre reasons. omnom, could i ask where your me/invis suspicions arise from?
Explained it earlier: I think joges' vote on sala early on was bad and that pinged me, and you two sheeped that vote so it left me with an even worse impression, so I think there's scum in the trio. I think the follow-up looks worse than joges and since I won't get anything from invis I'm voting you to get a reaction and talk.

also beetlejuice beetlejuice beetlejuice
In post 782, nomnomnom wrote:Unsure how I feel about Gjt by the way. Obviously the reasoning is bad but the fact that I've seen a lot of town players so self centered about what they would do as town and using that to scumhunt (despite that being bad) sounds tonally ok?

Nothing jumped to me about the slot when I skimmed anyway so
In post 797, nomnomnom wrote:
In post 796, Nicholai wrote:alright i'm done here, that's more than enough effort for one day.

omnom rex gjt invis are potential scum for me right now

let me know who you're townreading omnom, and please elaborate your scumread on me if it still there outside of the salsa vote

@gjt: what's your opinion of rex so far this game?
I think what you posted reads more town. Wimpy's slot is town imo so Ank must be town. I read FL as town. I don't recognize Bob's posts as belonging to his scumgame, he's much more assertive here, so slight town lean.

I'm not sold on your Gjt scumlean.

I think joges or invis is where it's at, despite invis being lolrandom because if there's any day to deal with this, it's day 1 imo.

Posted: Wed Jan 15, 2020 12:25 am
by nomnomnom
If that's equal to "no reads" for you, that I have no reads or insights on Gjt and that I only vote Invis because "lolrandom" then I don't know what to tell you. Just read.

Posted: Wed Jan 15, 2020 12:25 am
by Looker
How kind! :)

Posted: Wed Jan 15, 2020 12:32 am
by nomnomnom
VOTE: Looker

Posted: Wed Jan 15, 2020 3:24 am
by Ankamius
Well that was certainly an engagement

Posted: Wed Jan 15, 2020 7:28 am
by joges
In post 742, TheFuzzylogic99 wrote:Jorge
ok but you cant judge guilt of someone else by what you would do or not do. This is fuzzy logic and only i can have fuzzy logic
What I do as town, and how I act as town, and what I expect of town is exactly what I should, and you should (and everyone else should), base their reads off of. ESPECIALLY D1. I mean, what else am I supposed to go off of?

Posted: Wed Jan 15, 2020 7:37 am
by joges
In post 749, Ankamius wrote:this should be a fun time

I can't wait to hear why people scumread this slot
I wonder if it would be possible to somehow show at the top of a post that "x player replaced in for y player" I always forget who they replaced and have to go look it up.

Ank, are you town?

Posted: Wed Jan 15, 2020 7:38 am
by joges
In post 758, Kanna wrote:Agree Gjt's vote was bad but jojes vote was opportunistic uhhh
Which vote?

Posted: Wed Jan 15, 2020 7:41 am
by joges
In post 760, bob3141 wrote:VOTE: Non

Start talking. If your town we need to see content so we can deduce that. Otherwise you become a player town simply cant afford to take to lylo
I don't like this interaction. We are a long way off of a LyLo, and you're already thinking about the set up of it. I'm fine with you voting him, but I'm not okay with your reasons for it. Especially the "if you're town" part. I would think you would need to see content so you can decide their alignment, but you're suggesting they only post if they're town. Seems weird.

Posted: Wed Jan 15, 2020 7:43 am
by joges
In post 762, Kanna wrote:Ahh sorry it's Joges and I'm p sure I've been spelling it wrong this whole game. In my head, I'm pronouncing it, but Joges and Jojes sound the same
I think I'm the only one with a name that starts with a J here, so I think it's fine.

Posted: Wed Jan 15, 2020 7:45 am
by Kanna
In post 819, joges wrote:
In post 742, TheFuzzylogic99 wrote:Jorge
ok but you cant judge guilt of someone else by what you would do or not do. This is fuzzy logic and only i can have fuzzy logic
What I do as town, and how I act as town, and what I expect of town is exactly what I should, and you should (and everyone else should), base their reads off of. ESPECIALLY D1. I mean, what else am I supposed to go off of?
But not everyone is...you? People can have different thought processes and that still be valid

Pedit: I’ll try and remember Joges from now on :>