Mafiascum.net

In post 789, VP Baltar wrote:NPOM -- I asked you if you think Quick is scum based on your comment to Nauci. Please answer that.

Quick -- We can agree to disagree. I thought your system makes some valid points, but overall I agree with your own assessment that it's subjective...and that's the problem. Meanwhile: lol r2r, amirite?

Bro - it's PROVEN to catch Scum, JFYI.

In post 801, Quick wrote:

In post 789, VP Baltar wrote:NPOM -- I asked you if you think Quick is scum based on your comment to Nauci. Please answer that.

Quick -- We can agree to disagree. I thought your system makes some valid points, but overall I agree with your own assessment that it's subjective...and that's the problem. Meanwhile: lol r2r, amirite?

Bro - it's PROVEN to catch Scum, JFYI.

What's your lynching record?

In post 802, NoPowerOverMe wrote:

In post 801, Quick wrote:

In post 789, VP Baltar wrote:NPOM -- I asked you if you think Quick is scum based on your comment to Nauci. Please answer that.

Quick -- We can agree to disagree. I thought your system makes some valid points, but overall I agree with your own assessment that it's subjective...and that's the problem. Meanwhile: lol r2r, amirite?

Bro - it's PROVEN to catch Scum, JFYI.

What's your lynching record?

Not going to entertain this with a response. I've cased you with a slip AND by the numbers you are Scum. Nice try though.

VP Baltar wrote:
- Quick's "system to destroy scum" is, um, problematic at best.... mostly because it's far too complex to consistently yield anything coherent. After a quick scan, I couldn't tell you what the actual decision tree would be with such a system.

1. Identify players who are actively trying to solve the game.

2. Identify players who do not appear to be actively solving the game, or who are actively or passively obstructing others from the same.

3. Vote for the players identified in #2.

4. Thoroughly explain your reasoning to the players you identified in #1, persuading them through wit, humor, and overwhelming charismatic charm to vote for the players identified in #2.

5. March steadfastly toward a town victory, hammering pro-scum and anti-town players with extreme prejudice.

6. Boost Townie morale with witty ripostes and dank memes.

7. Profit!*

In post 803, Quick wrote:I've cased you with a slip

Which slip was it?

In post 804, Blair wrote:* In the event that you have received a scum role pm, promptly forget that you have done so and act accordingly.

are you saying even when you're scum you're trying to destroy scum

VOTE: ready2rock

I'll throw this puppy a bone; we have plenty of time left

In post 806, Nauci wrote:

In post 804, Blair wrote:* In the event that you have received a scum role pm, promptly forget that you have done so and act accordingly.

are you saying even when you're scum you're trying to destroy scum

Obviously there's room for some nuance in there, but in general? Yes, of course, you can't run a very convincing scum-game otherwise.

There are no truly objective tells, so even when you're doing your very best you're going to hit town sometimes. There's no reason to build fake cases as scum when the real cases are wrong all the time anyway.

In post 803, Quick wrote:

In post 802, NoPowerOverMe wrote:

In post 801, Quick wrote:

In post 789, VP Baltar wrote:NPOM -- I asked you if you think Quick is scum based on your comment to Nauci. Please answer that.

Quick -- We can agree to disagree. I thought your system makes some valid points, but overall I agree with your own assessment that it's subjective...and that's the problem. Meanwhile: lol r2r, amirite?

Bro - it's PROVEN to catch Scum, JFYI.

What's your lynching record?

Not going to entertain this with a response. I've cased you with a slip AND by the numbers you are Scum. Nice try though.

I didn't slip. Nice try though.

(The "need" to develop fake cases and reads is a side effect of hubris - you don't feel like you need this unless you genuinely believe your real reads would reliably cost you the game as scum)

Town unite!

VOTE: ready2rock

In post 805, Blair wrote:

In post 803, Quick wrote:I've cased you with a slip

Which slip was it?

You said it was a slip, not me

Ah ok, that one.

I was afraid you had a juicy new one you were holding out on!

In post 814, Blair wrote:Ah ok, that one.

I was afraid you had a juicy new one you were holding out on!

I don't really think many things are actually slips, I just wanted to see if you would pick up on what I said.

In post 804, Blair wrote:

VP Baltar wrote:
- Quick's "system to destroy scum" is, um, problematic at best.... mostly because it's far too complex to consistently yield anything coherent. After a quick scan, I couldn't tell you what the actual decision tree would be with such a system.

Blair's System To Destroy Scum™

1. Identify players who are actively trying to solve the game.

2. Identify players who do not appear to be actively solving the game, or who are actively or passively obstructing others from the same.

3. Vote for the players identified in #2.

4. Thoroughly explain your reasoning to the players you identified in #1, persuading them through wit, humor, and overwhelming charismatic charm to vote for the players identified in #2.

5. March steadfastly toward a town victory, hammering pro-scum and anti-town players with extreme prejudice.

6. Boost Townie morale with witty ripostes and dank memes.

7. Profit!*

* In the event that you have received a scum role pm, promptly forget that you have done so and act accordingly.

Same here, but I skip steps 1-5, and sometimes 7

In post 804, Blair wrote:

VP Baltar wrote:
- Quick's "system to destroy scum" is, um, problematic at best.... mostly because it's far too complex to consistently yield anything coherent. After a quick scan, I couldn't tell you what the actual decision tree would be with such a system.

Blair's System To Destroy Scum™

1. Identify players who are actively trying to solve the game.

2. Identify players who do not appear to be actively solving the game, or who are actively or passively obstructing others from the same.

3. Vote for the players identified in #2.

4. Thoroughly explain your reasoning to the players you identified in #1, persuading them through wit, humor, and overwhelming charismatic charm to vote for the players identified in #2.

5. March steadfastly toward a town victory, hammering pro-scum and anti-town players with extreme prejudice.

6. Boost Townie morale with witty ripostes and dank memes.

7. Profit!*

* In the event that you have received a scum role pm, promptly forget that you have done so and act accordingly.

Same here, but I skip steps 1-5, and sometimes 7

Why are NoPowerOverMe, Ready2Rock, and votato wagons?

In post 812, NoPowerOverMe wrote:Town unite!

VOTE: ready2rock

What made you switch votes, was it because it looks like you two are the only viable wagons right now?

In post 807, Nauci wrote:VOTE: ready2rock

I'll throw this puppy a bone; we have plenty of time left

In post 812, NoPowerOverMe wrote:Town unite!

VOTE: ready2rock

Scum claims by forcing the wagon between the better Scum player and the worse one.

In post 818, Dunnstral wrote:Why are NoPowerOverMe, Ready2Rock, and votato wagons?

In post 812, NoPowerOverMe wrote:Town unite!

VOTE: ready2rock

What made you switch votes, was it because it looks like you two are the only viable wagons right now?

Because the Scum team is NPOM, R2R, and Nauci. Dead serious.

Welcome, Dunnstral!

Mind filling us in real quick on what style of catch-up we can expect from you as a replacement?

Anything Quick says to do you should do the exact opposite. Serious.

In post 821, Blair wrote:Welcome, Dunnstral!

Mind filling us in real quick on what style of catch-up we can expect from you as a replacement?

I plan on reading the game in a few hours

In the meantime I'm posting from where I replaced in

In post 822, NoPowerOverMe wrote:Anything Quick says to do you should do the exact opposite. Serious.

Thanks.