Posted: Tue Dec 29, 2020 8:16 pm
In post 798, Lunar Martian wrote:795 is not a townie post.In post 795, NoPowerOverMe wrote:794 not a townie post.
Says the person asking people to stop being aggressive.
In post 798, Lunar Martian wrote:795 is not a townie post.In post 795, NoPowerOverMe wrote:794 not a townie post.
I'm sure that others will find plenty to pick apart here; I feel compelled to point out that you're the only one calling Lunar pretty obvious scum and I'm not sure why you chose to make this question town-with-unusual-temperament vs pretty-obvious-scum, that's an unusual way to phrase the question and it's pretty obvious that you want to OMGUS me but can't make a case against me because there isn't one.In post 772, ORAM wrote:UNVOTE:
Was following this game before replacing in, so that's cool. Maybe I'm weird, but I don't think Lunar is especially likely to be scum. The wagon on them seems to be more motivated by them not getting along well with people here than by them being scummy. I don't see scum so blatantly drawing attention to themselves, especially if they have a nervous personality. I don't like the wagon either. Galron and Bugspray's votes both feel like "well here's a wagon, might as well vote it," and then there's frogster. I don't like how they've been convinced Lunar is scum since Lunar's first post and haven't wavered since, even as they reevaluate every other slot. It all feels like an inertia wagon.
I'm notcompletelysold on Bugspray being scum either, but I like their wagon comp a lot better. I think NPOM and Luca are town. Gamma too, with the caveat that I've read a lot of games he's been in and liked his posting regardless of alignment. OutWorldER is a big ??? because so few posts, but their vote here feels... fine? I kinda like it, but can't find the words to say why. My only doubts are because I get the feeling that the inconsistencies in their thought process and read progression might actually just be their personality.
Why the hell did this post take me like 2 hours to write, what the hell. I don't really have a strong impression on Grendel, Trendall, Mom, or Amélie, and will work on them next time.
@Luca (and anyone else with Bugs meta): Do you think bugs' scummy-looking behavior could be their personality, or am I off base?
@Frogster: Do you want me to do that OCEAN thing?
What do you think the odds are that Lunar is town with unusual temperament versus pretty obvious scum?
Also, can you walk me through the progression there? It's not super clear where and why they became your most consistent scumread.
That isn’t an accurate representation of the timelineIn post 777, Amélie wrote:You recently said you reviewed my posting and thought me town. Then soon after I moved you to my scum reads and this post followed.
Can you talk to me about how you are thinking?
Curious why frogster didn’t address this when bringing up that point about emotion beforeIn post 717, Amélie wrote:I feel like this is either a huge play style clash or you are scum. I hate nearly every post you post.
Gamma your emotion toward Amelie is disgust and sensitivity to disgust is correlated with conscientiousness.In post 807, Gamma Emerald wrote:Curious why frogster didn’t address this when bringing up that point about emotion beforeIn post 717, Amélie wrote:I feel like this is either a huge play style clash or you are scum. I hate nearly every post you post.
Btw I think part of the problem with your posts Amelie is you put your thoughts behind the spoiler= tag so it’s harder to engage with.
I remember that! I put everyone's avatar in a circle and then drew random lines of different colors and claimed it explained everythingIn post 810, Luca Blight wrote:During Bugs’ scum game I remember them doing this weird chart of associations, which also showed some creativity. That’s just off the top of my head, I’ll re-check their meta for anything else.
EBWOPIn post 816, Gamma Emerald wrote:@NPOM and the other anti-s: still think this personality stuff is bullshit?
Replace chronological age with mafia age. There is an unnatural amount if irration and useage of energy trying to keep up with the newer generation of mafiaIn post 812, Frogsterking wrote:Well it looks like you're both in your early 20s so scratch that theory out.
Are you talking about when i said that only one scum was on the No Power wagon?In post 801, Frogsterking wrote:
My earlier question was related to something you said in this game about scum choosing not to associate with partners that are doing well.
I prefer OWER over Trendall especially if Lunar is scum here. The fact that he doesn't mind OWER and Trendall but votes Trendalls smaller wagon over OWERS larger wagon at the time (by a vote or two) feels like he's trying to push a CW to a possible partner only to leave himself open to bus him towards the end to reduce the association between the two of them.
Yeah, I'd say one or more players call me out as being too cautious in about every game i've played in these days. I also agree that Amilie is predisposed to wanna scum read me in most instances based off play style alone. I feel thats obvious since she made a point of saying how every post i make looks scum motivated to her. Which is why i've not really seen her reads on my slot as a meaningful way to sort her.In post 815, Frogsterking wrote: Similar story but not quite the same. Grendel IS in his mid 20s so his conscientiousness may have increased over time, which Amelie will subconsciously perceive as a propensity for authoritarianism and because she is following her emotions she will act with hostility.Even more, I think that kind of like Gamma and his slight inclination for Order, Grendel is built to incorporate some Cautiousness alongside his Openness. I think Grendel chooses his words carefully. Therefore it makes sense that Amelie would experience hostility toward Grendel on some level because of his Cautiousness especially since that is actually a valid scum tell in many instances.
____________
Ref http://www.personal.psu.edu/faculty/j/5 ... tions.html
In post 806, Gamma Emerald wrote:That isn’t an accurate representation of the timelineIn post 777, Amélie wrote:You recently said you reviewed my posting and thought me town. Then soon after I moved you to my scum reads and this post followed.
Can you talk to me about how you are thinking?
I feel like it’s hard to parse out what factors into your reads so they come across as baseless and random