In post 797, Save The Dragons wrote:andante how do you handle pressure in chat mafia (you're the one who said you played that, right?)
can you expand on this? how do you think your reaction to pressure differs as scum?In post 801, Andante wrote:I hate pressure, I break under it too, take it more as a joke as scum
yeah i don't think this is happeningIn post 803, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:I always have the time of my life
VOTE: Lemons
we kill Gandalf today
join me forces of evil
In post 804, InsidiousLemons wrote:can you expand on this? how do you think your reaction to pressure differs as scum?In post 801, Andante wrote:I hate pressure, I break under it too, take it more as a joke as scum
In post 806, Andante wrote:In post 804, InsidiousLemons wrote:can you expand on this? how do you think your reaction to pressure differs as scum?In post 801, Andante wrote:I hate pressure, I break under it too, take it more as a joke as scum
uhhh not really, too hard to explain, I'm gonna go play in the snow (we have a snow storm right now) and when I'm back I'm ISOing Haschel, and if he's been here for 5 days with no content, I'm voting him, would rather keep people who try.
In post 803, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:I always have the time of my life
VOTE: Lemons
we kill Gandalf today
join me forces of evil
In post 775, InsidiousLemons wrote:@mod why are there so many jesters in this setup
Shocking
will you explain this vote for me?
do you pay union rates?In post 704, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:Green Crayons, will you be the first of my Nazgûl ? To ride forth and terrorize the land in my name?
sir this is a family gameIn post 715, Save The Dragons wrote:i kind of want to get annihilated by pooky
pretty sure if this is noobscum the "but for real" clause is also supposed to be jokingIn post 718, InsidiousLemons wrote:if you were joking the whole time then why separate the post into two parts? why say "but for real?"
agree with this point.In post 718, InsidiousLemons wrote:also strange to me that you only back up your null reads and don't mention your, you know, actual reads
all hail Pooky, our new supreme overlordIn post 721, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:one of my rules is no posts over 10 lines.
what's the post that did it for you?In post 763, Robert M Hunter wrote:I changed my mind, Andante is town. Deal with it.
754In post 817, Green Crayons wrote:what's the post that did it for you?In post 763, Robert M Hunter wrote:I changed my mind, Andante is town. Deal with it.
agree. neither of those two were the post that gave me pause.In post 819, Save The Dragons wrote:you may have gotten sucked in by an AtE
this andante is very unsure of any reads at all.In post 647, Andante wrote:so I have determined. there's not a scum read I'm super confident in at this point in time.
[...]
I think it was crayons or dragon I was feeling was weird, idk. I don't even remember what I told yall last night, should probably start there
then they "collect their thoughts" and decide dragons is sus, without providing any reasoning. when prompted, they have this to say:In post 649, Andante wrote: Save The Dragons - Sus
to be fair, pawns wasn't giving dragons much to go off of. the conversation, of which here you provide only one side, feels more to me like save the dragons attempting to have the type of conversation you're talking about and getting very little in return. don't get me wrong, certainly not the most insightful posts in std's iso, but i don't find anything here that really merits a scumread on its own.In post 664, Andante wrote:@Dragon, I'll elaborate on you,
It's lines like these, they have no content to them... your cat thing feels so weird, and like "you're putting more effort crucifying robert than pushing your vote" for context this came immediately after you voted me. None of your lines feel like you're trying to find scum.In post 540, Save The Dragons wrote:do you just hate cats?These VFP lines, you're implying VFP is your TR, and you don't understand why someone SRs them. Why not give why you think VFP is town? engage in a conversation about it, give the side you see, compare notes, etc. Like, reading your ISO, most lines are just responding to osuka, or lines like this, that seem to be going in no direction. You throw out questions like this, never return to them to follow up!!! It literally feels like maf to me, reading more into you here, I'd move you from sus to scum tbh. Town that's trying to find scum would ask relevant questions, then return to them, if you out a tr/sr, doesn't it make sense to talk to someone who's outing an opposite read from you?? idk, it feels like you're trying to go no where with all your posts.In post 542, Save The Dragons wrote:you're putting more effort crucifying robert than pushing your vote
so i'm wondering if you're just allergic to cats or something i dunno
In post 543, Save The Dragons wrote:why exactly did you think VFP was scummy again?In post 546, Save The Dragons wrote:do you have anything else on VFP?
this is the post in question:In post 664, Andante wrote: looking at #354 (idk if this link works.... testing..)
looking at #354, osuka is like "what's your thought on this" and you pretty much go "idk, I tr you" like, changing the topic, your lines feel really weird to me, and I'm not entirely sure why you feel so off...
there are 2 parts to this post -- "here's why i haven't given it much thought yet" and "here's the take itself". andante mischaracterizes this post as consisting solely of the answer to the first question ("because i'm reading osuke as town"), and ignores the meat of std's response. this post isn't changing the topic, it's responding directly to the question. of all the posts you could have quoted, why choose one where std actually brings up some pretty okay points? did you even read the whole post?In post 354, Save The Dragons wrote:I honestly haven't given it too much thought because i'm reading you as town.In post 325, osuka wrote:what's your take on vfp's push?
I don't quite buy that being toxic makes you scum, but i have seen scum use toxicity to their ends, so i'm not sure if i agree but i don't mind the headspace they're in. 275 is a little weird because all they seem to do is say you post NAI and positive things in their PBPA. I feel like scum in that situation finds something to pin on you instead of just kind of throwing their hands up. I mean they repeat the point about toxicity being scummy but...eh?
plus i use my gut a lot and it's pinging for some people and not really for VFP at the moment.
Code: Select all
[post]354[/post]one last point, reading back -- is this a scum slip? "i'll get voted out before i claim" implies andante wouldn't claim until they are actually eliminated. is there ever town motivation for withholding a claim until the hammer is dropped? on second reading this could almost feel like reassurance to a scumpartner, but i don't feel comfortable calling anya scum yet. still, this association is definitely worth revisiting if one of them flips.In post 749, Andante wrote:haha I won't actually claim!!! dw. I'll get voted out before I do claim