Posted: Wed Jun 09, 2021 12:23 am
Ok wonow the question becomes why kerset got traction but sircakezwas stuck
~ skitter
~ skitter
dwlee, could you elaborate / give examples for this?In post 679, Dwlee99 wrote:I think your posting is weird and defensive in a way I don't expect town to behave.
I’ve seen a few things that strike me as townyIn post 804, Tigerente wrote:Ok why
(And i think it was pretty clear this is ultimately what i was asking >.>)
~ skitter
Ok so like can you say what those things are ...In post 803, Gamma Emerald wrote:I am townreading him
What a weird thing to comment on especially when you most likely don’t understand.
Yes...interesting how we have enough votes to push through a kerset elim overnight...In post 800, Tigerente wrote:Ok wonow the question becomes why kerset got traction but sircakezwas stuck
~ skitter
There was a whole back and forth between me and skitbork about this that would answer your question.In post 765, Kerset wrote:i dont understandIn post 673, PenguinPower wrote:Did you read on or....?In post 657, Kerset wrote:One head says that i am null and the other head votes me. Did you ignore it or didn't pay attention?
Sure but I've been chronically phone posting so soonTM.In post 805, Datisi wrote:dwlee, could you elaborate / give examples for this?In post 679, Dwlee99 wrote:I think your posting is weird and defensive in a way I don't expect town to behave.
i think i have been very clear in saying that i dislike gamma's posts this game. i just took a peek at the post counts, and gamma has about the same amount of posts as i do, but i feel like i don't remember a single Thing he's done this game. also i vaguely townlean you and i have a tinfoil that kerset/gamma are acting weird around one another so let's See What Happens.In post 818, Tigerente wrote:Pedit dats why are u joining me ?
You try to justify BoP wagon by putting things in to my mouth. Very scummy.
Votes moved to me... i got e-2In post 798, Tigerente wrote:Well my point is more going back another step: scum seem content with the cakez wagon (as evidenced by the fact that no votes are moving), so like whyIn post 787, The Limit Does Not Exist wrote:this feels like almost a tautology... if scum (or anyone, really) were unhappy with their current vote, why wouldn't they move it?In post 743, Tigerente wrote:i feel like i just said it: scum are fine with their current votes, whereever they are (cakez, vanity) and are not incentivized to move them
that doesn't mean that cake voters are scum but rather that whereever scum are voting they're p content
-S
~ skitteR
What if a bop.In post 820, Kerset wrote:You try to justify BoP wagon by putting things in to my mouth. Very scummy.
noIn post 794, Datisi wrote:kerset, do you have like, any reads and reasonings behind them or something?