Mafiascum.net

In post 798, WhemeStar wrote:

In post 790, Kate Bishop wrote:

In post 789, WhemeStar wrote:

In post 780, ssbm_Kyouko wrote:

In post 754, GuyInFreezer wrote:For myself:
(expired on 2021-09-05 01:47:11)

hmmmm

Wheme, why did you vote KB in the first place?
Why did you switch off of KB?

I switched off because I am LLD's Thunderfury blessed blade of the windseeker and I will vote whoever they vote.

Why LLD as opposed to, say Cabd?

Because Cabd is also LLD's sword

In post 799, Kate Bishop wrote:I'm curious what your disagreement is, unwnd.

In post 751, GuyInFreezer wrote:If she's lying about her role (which should be very easily confirmable) we yeet her.
But until then double day is incredibly useful for town so we should just abuse it.
It's really that simple.

In post 801, unwnd wrote:

In post 799, Kate Bishop wrote:I'm curious what your disagreement is, unwnd.

I feel like I pointed them out just now

In post 803, Kate Bishop wrote:Cabd seems like other stuff is occupying his mental gamespace right now.

In post 802, Cabd wrote:Interested in hearing your objections to the "have manatee do second elim with public consensus" plan?

In post 804, Kate Bishop wrote:

In post 801, unwnd wrote:

In post 799, Kate Bishop wrote:I'm curious what your disagreement is, unwnd.

I feel like I pointed them out just now

You haven't explained what you don't like about Toog being the leading wagon unless I missed it.

In post 807, Kate Bishop wrote:

In post 802, Cabd wrote:Interested in hearing your objections to the "have manatee do second elim with public consensus" plan?

Was I correct to take away from our short convo last night that you don't have questions for me about how I've approached the game and you in particular?

unwnd wrote:

In post 804, Kate Bishop wrote:

In post 801, unwnd wrote:

In post 799, Kate Bishop wrote:I'm curious what your disagreement is, unwnd.

I feel like I pointed them out just now

You haven't explained what you don't like about Toog being the leading wagon unless I missed it.

Nothing wrong with the makeup of the wagon barring one (maybe two) votes

I just don't think it flips scum if my own thoughts be true

Cabd wrote:

In post 807, Kate Bishop wrote:

In post 802, Cabd wrote:Interested in hearing your objections to the "have manatee do second elim with public consensus" plan?

Was I correct to take away from our short convo last night that you don't have questions for me about how I've approached the game and you in particular?

I think my observations were valid about the postmortem but if you feel they're not you are welcome to engage on that aspect of things.

In post 805, unwnd wrote:My thought on manatee is slightly mechanical. I think her role is too strong to be a scum role, because it goes against what you normally see from mafia roles. Their actions are done at night to counter town abilities or fortify themselves. Manatee's role is a open statement and something that would just give scum an easier step towards their wincon of reaching 50% majority, which to me isn't very wise and would leave a lot of people bitching. Again, jjh says this game is not bastard. A scum role that can give two mislims or randomly eject someone is pretty fucking bastard. I would have complaints.

That being said, the plan isn't terrible, but I don't feel like it's something you can force. If you read Manatee's content up until this point it looks like she doesn't even care. She's not considering her role or how to use it effectively, which in my eyes makes her less townie; I think GiF's tinfoil is right.

In post 811, unwnd wrote:Because I have 3 (4) other people who I think have a better chance to do so

In post 783, unwnd wrote:Manatee's recent post is off

But i wouldn't categorize her as scun

if my own theories are right

In post 803, Kate Bishop wrote:

In post 751, GuyInFreezer wrote:If she's lying about her role (which should be very easily confirmable) we yeet her.
But until then double day is incredibly useful for town so we should just abuse it.
It's really that simple.

If I have my druthers, you and Dunn will be instrumental in guiding what manatee does with her abilities today.

Cabd seems like other stuff is occupying his mental gamespace right now.

In post 816, Dunnstral wrote:Last that was heard they wanted to use it to hammer and shoot somebody at night, but using it during the day seems better

In post 817, DrippingGoofball wrote:

In post 816, Dunnstral wrote:Last that was heard they wanted to use it to hammer and shoot somebody at night, but using it during the day seems better

Since you understand how it works, can you explain it to me?

In post 818, Dunnstral wrote:

In post 817, DrippingGoofball wrote:

In post 816, Dunnstral wrote:Last that was heard they wanted to use it to hammer and shoot somebody at night, but using it during the day seems better

Since you understand how it works, can you explain it to me?

If their second vote is on wagon, they gain a one-shot vigilante for that night
If their second vote is off wagon, that player dies at the end of the day along with the original elimination
If their second vote is on nobody, a random town-aligned player dies

Once they place their second vote, it can't be moved during that same day

That's how I understand it

In post 819, Kate Bishop wrote:If we want her to use the second option then the second vote should wait until the elim is decided.

In post 820, Dunnstral wrote:

In post 819, Kate Bishop wrote:If we want her to use the second option then the second vote should wait until the elim is decided.

IMO she should use her second vote on the wagon that is mostly decided (Toogeloo) and we figure out the second elimination with votes, rather than vice versa

In post 822, unwnd wrote:I'm fine with co-signing Dunn's plan