Posted: Sun Aug 08, 2021 6:28 pm
Fuck, messed up the quote formatting on that.
https://forum.mafiascum-staging.net/
People say that about me in every game.In post 789, Nero Cain wrote:Your play just seems so different this game
I will do as I please, you are not the gatekeeper of my posts.In post 795, Gamma Emerald wrote:This is cool but please spare us the play-by-play
That's rich.In post 801, Nero Cain wrote:gamma is getting away with an equally (and maybe even worse) "meta" read
In post 796, LicketyQuickety wrote:Happy Scum day Gamma!
How so?In post 804, DrippingGoofball wrote:That's rich.In post 801, Nero Cain wrote:gamma is getting away with an equally (and maybe even worse) "meta" read
You literally went over the same point twice in two consecutive postsIn post 803, DrippingGoofball wrote:I will do as I please, you are not the gatekeeper of my posts.In post 795, Gamma Emerald wrote:This is cool but please spare us the play-by-play
Why not kitty? I was just speculating on a fully lurksack team.In post 809, Nero Cain wrote:Y kitty?
In post 807, CheekyTeeky wrote:The play by play gave me town fuzzies.
I don’t think Kitty is scum rnIn post 808, CheekyTeeky wrote:Maybs it's just T3, Kitty, Testa and a mystery scumbutt like AA9.
Well they're highlighting a pretty pivotal point in the wagons that I don't scum would bring attention to.In post 813, Gamma Emerald wrote:I meant to respond to 807
If the play-by-play bears fruit I can get that but it half-feels like busywork
Meaning?In post 819, NorwegianboyEE wrote:I think i’m more in the Cheeky school than Nero school when it comes to elimination priority.
@GammaIn post 808, CheekyTeeky wrote:Maybs it's just T3, Kitty, Testa and a mystery scumbutt like AA9.
I just feel like wagon analysis would give away too many associatives in hindsight. I mean it's just fuzzies, nothing to commit over.In post 816, Gamma Emerald wrote:Why don’t you think scum bring attention to it?