Posted: Mon Oct 04, 2021 2:15 am
'mother pagetop?
Remind me your reasoning for SRing Three again?
Very possible since there's multi tasking.In post 801, fua wrote:What if it’s just 2 PRs and the traitor? No goons abound.
I thought at the time it felt like a bluff, but one that could have come from town trying to pull some fancy shit.In post 770, Almost50 wrote:Are crumbing "Scum that know there's no traitor" or am I missing something?? cookie claimed specific info (i.e. didn't stop at "I'm Informed") so what makes you think it's "very likely a lie"?In post 294, Jacket wrote:The claim is very likely a lie.
P.S. If it's already answered later, I'll find it.
Miracles happenIn post 804, Almost50 wrote:Add three to the Scum bin for his posts on page 16
P-edit: D.. did.. you just agree on a read with me??? And without communication or discussion??? I am shocked to the core.
This is the thing you decide to jump in and comment on?In post 805, GeorgeBailey wrote:Very possible since there's multi tasking.In post 801, fua wrote:What if it’s just 2 PRs and the traitor? No goons abound.
Doesn't change my read on three, but does promote fua to a full TR. THANSK for you help.In post 418, Three wrote:I see.In post 406, T3 wrote:In post 358, cool cookie wrote:i'm ambivalent about the claim. an outted traitor doesn't serve much purpose for mafia, so there isn't anything we particularly lose by giving redtea a night to prove the claim. gut is i don't buy it thoughFua's vote on george gut pinged me as really terrible.
VOTE: Fua
I was MIA during the weekend and I'm posting on break. Idk. Just trying to get a grip on the game right now. I'm gonna post more in depth stuff after work.In post 809, Jacket wrote:This is the thing you decide to jump in and comment on?In post 805, GeorgeBailey wrote:Very possible since there's multi tasking.In post 801, fua wrote:What if it’s just 2 PRs and the traitor? No goons abound.
This was my thought at the time as well, before I got distracted because I thought redtea was acting scummy. It'd be an easy vote to follow. Didn't help that they were the same people who were piling on Osetr. I think Osetr was an easy target for scum because of his trolling, that allows them to hind behind voting out of policy rather than actually having any reason for thinking he was scum. That was what I was being so hard on fua about.In post 777, TheZenMan wrote:TBH, I am very suspicous about the redtea lynching wagon happening so fast and quick. Definetly wasn't a pure wagon and probably some scum bandwagoning there. If redtea really is vig then there are ways to confirm that (2 nks maybe). The only ones I'm seeing that could benefit of redtea dying at this point is probably scum.
Outed as what? A Vig is ALWAYS Town-aligned in Normals, so 2 kills confirm him as TOWN.In post 434, House wrote:Because he agreed not to shoot if we mislim.
If there are 2 kills tonight after a mislim, he's outed.
And THERE's the "hopping off wagon" move. Not as incriminating (as it's probably been a RVS vote, but still not a good looking move).In post 462, Save The Dragons wrote:UNVOTE:
Haven't been giving this game the attention it deserves will try to tomorrow after coffee
I like a cool cookie and a cup of red tea better. I can neither eat nor drink a house.In post 498, Save The Dragons wrote:i like cool cookie and house for town
You mean on D2? This is post is confusing.In post 819, TheZenMan wrote:Imo, readtea should shootsomeone n1 then tell us who he shot after deadline for n1 actions has passed. That way we can confirm his claim and also get rid of a potential scum.
I'm not sure I follow this. Are you just saying Redtea should shoot someone n1 then tell us his target D2?In post 819, TheZenMan wrote:Imo, readtea should shootsomeone n1 then tell us who he shot after deadline for n1 actions has passed. That way we can confirm his claim and also get rid of a potential scum.