Manatee's Pokemon Large Theme | Game Over
Forum rules
- Milobird
-
Milobird Mafia Scum
- Milobird
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1683
- Joined: October 2, 2021
- Milobird
-
Milobird Mafia Scum
- Milobird
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1683
- Joined: October 2, 2021
WhemeIn post 6148, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:every shot is on confirmed town
why would scum shoot me and leave conf town alive- Milobird
-
Milobird Mafia Scum
- Milobird
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1683
- Joined: October 2, 2021
- Milobird
-
Milobird Mafia Scum
- Milobird
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1683
- Joined: October 2, 2021
- Milobird
-
Milobird Mafia Scum
- Milobird
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1683
- Joined: October 2, 2021
Nope.In post 6160, SirCakez wrote:
this is such BS you're pulling this out of your ass to discredit meIn post 6021, Milobird wrote:Cakez Takez are just kinda ew this game though. They're...I dunno. It's like we read the game totally differently along with people's motivations etc.
-Bell- Milobird
-
Milobird Mafia Scum
- Milobird
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1683
- Joined: October 2, 2021
- Milobird
-
Milobird Mafia Scum
- Milobird
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1683
- Joined: October 2, 2021
- Milobird
-
Milobird Mafia Scum
- Milobird
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1683
- Joined: October 2, 2021
- Milobird
-
Milobird Mafia Scum
- Milobird
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1683
- Joined: October 2, 2021
- Milobird
-
Milobird Mafia Scum
- Milobird
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1683
- Joined: October 2, 2021
- Milobird
-
Milobird Mafia Scum
- Milobird
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1683
- Joined: October 2, 2021
- Milobird
-
Milobird Mafia Scum
- Milobird
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1683
- Joined: October 2, 2021
- Milobird
-
Milobird Mafia Scum
- Milobird
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1683
- Joined: October 2, 2021
- Milobird
-
Milobird Mafia Scum
- Milobird
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1683
- Joined: October 2, 2021
- Milobird
-
Milobird Mafia Scum
- Milobird
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1683
- Joined: October 2, 2021
- Milobird
-
Milobird Mafia Scum
- Milobird
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1683
- Joined: October 2, 2021
- Milobird
-
Milobird Mafia Scum
- Milobird
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1683
- Joined: October 2, 2021
- Milobird
-
Milobird Mafia Scum
- Milobird
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1683
- Joined: October 2, 2021
In post 6180, SirCakez wrote:this Milo vs Pooky slapfight is completely useless and not helping me at all here
I'm going to reread earlier parts of the game starting on my break tomorrow and look for actually useful content
FFS, who is doing this slap fight? Who is trying their level best to make it into a slap fight?
Don't be stupid Cakez. Pay attention.
-Bell- Milobird
-
Milobird
- Milobird
-
Milobird Mafia Scum
- Milobird
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1683
- Joined: October 2, 2021
In post 206, Ralts wrote:
Every wagon so far has been random tho, why call out this oneIn post 199, Save The Dragons wrote:seems randomIn post 217, Ralts wrote:
Think there were wagons on dwlee and cakezIn post 210, Save The Dragons wrote:
what other wagonIn post 206, Ralts wrote:
Every wagon so far has been random tho, why call out this oneIn post 199, Save The Dragons wrote:seems randomIn post 227, Ralts wrote:
Uhhh I don't get itIn post 219, Save The Dragons wrote:i think you already received your answerIn post 231, Save The Dragons wrote:
you said every wagon was randomIn post 227, Ralts wrote:
Uhhh I don't get itIn post 219, Save The Dragons wrote:i think you already received your answer
i said what other wagons implying i don't know the existence of other random wagons therefore why would i call out another wagonIn post 232, Ralts wrote:FairIn post 238, Thestatusquo wrote:ok but given that its RVS and all wagons are going to be dumb why did you make that callout like you did? Further to the point, what did you hope to accomplish by calling it out like you did?
It seems to me that as someone who has been playing since 2004 you would know that frequently wagons start in RVS for basically no reason, are dumb, and then from the ashes of those wagons people actually start having more relevant opinions and that's how we move from noise to signal.
So like, what does town you hope to accomplish in this instance from specifically saying "x wagon is dumb."
Like, yes it is, that's the point. And I know you know this.In post 239, Milobird wrote:I wanna kill FB and STD.
-Milobird
Ralts and TSQ seem okay, but I’ll wait and see.
-BellIn post 248, Thestatusquo wrote:The question was "what did you hope to gain from posting 'x wagon is dumb' when you know that all early wagons are dumb and indeed that's how the entire beginning of a mafia game works"In post 249, Milobird wrote:I think I’m usually pretty obvious town as town. I get overexcited and make occasionally scummy posts but usually bluster right on through to be annoyingly difficult to elim just from sheer quantity.
Except I can’t spam post because weekday job is demanding. So I should probably get a new meta.
STD is lying and being weird and I’ll take that to the bank.
-BellIn post 260, Save The Dragons wrote:ok you found me
it's not possible for town to call out a wagon as dumb
you're right sheaIn post 273, Save The Dragons wrote:
noIn post 272, Thestatusquo wrote:1) first quote: so? do you usually call out all dumb 3 person wagons you become aware of on page 9 of a large?
i post what i feel as town and edit myself as scum
guess which one this was
since when do i do what people generally do or don't doIn post 272, Thestatusquo wrote:2) second quote: ok but you're missing my point which is that people generally don't do this because they know its fluff and they are looking to find actual things to talk about which might create meaningful information for them to solve other players alignment which brings me to
isn't it weird how i ended up voting one of the wagoners tho :thinking emoji:In post 272, Thestatusquo wrote:3) third quote: I don't see you doing that here. It's less a scum motivation thing and more of a scum mindset thing. Scum frequently have a hard time doing the whole trying to solve players thing because they already know the alignment of their partners, so they find ways to talk about the game which don't have actual consequence. they want to look like they're scum hunting or trying to divine alignment, but they're not. Your statement was that. It was the exact kind of statement scum makes when they're trying to look like they're making game relevant observations which under closer scrutiny are actually just meaningless fluff.
i think you may not have an updated metaIn post 272, Thestatusquo wrote:And that brings me to the snarky citation needed post. The town std I'm familiar with would be attempting to solve me through this discussion. you're not. you're attempting to shade my arguments and try to make them look ridiculous. every single response you've made has been a slight misinterpretation of what I'm saying to make it look slightly worse than it actually is. I don't get the impression at all that you're curious about my alignment here, and given that my meta as scum definitely includes making aggressive d1 pushes (side eye: fb for townbinning me when he should know that about my scum game. potential pocket attempt?) one would think you would be.In post 304, Woolax wrote:I like tsq's takes so far. happy to see where this goes
VOTE: save the dragonsIn post 308, Gypyx wrote:am i the only one to like STD's reaction to his wagon? Like, it's quite the overagression from TSQ, and fenrir's reaction doesn't really feel calculated if y'all see what i mean
additionally wheme seems coolIn post 311, Gypyx wrote:nah, i just like the content of his character and the greeneness of his role PM
most major thing is that i doubt scum would do the charizard fake claim thingyIn post 312, Gypyx wrote:
i'm thinking that STD's comment on the gamestate isn't indicative of him actually picking between wagons to choose which one to call out as random as this is the only real wagon we got while STD was online, besides yeah, it was absolutely random too and i don't see why you're making such a big deal outta thisIn post 310, Thestatusquo wrote:
What of my points do you disagree with?In post 308, Gypyx wrote:am i the only one to like STD's reaction to his wagon? Like, it's quite the overagression from TSQ, and fenrir's reaction doesn't really feel calculated if y'all see what i mean
additionally wheme seems coolIn post 313, Thestatusquo wrote:I think you must not be reading my posts then. Because my argument has very little to do with which wagon STD called out but rather why STD made that comment at all.In post 314, Gypyx wrote:hmmm, fuck
yeah okay that's fair, better that way, still weighting on the side of town!STD thoIn post 315, mastina wrote:Yo, will be back here to read and give reads later but for now just wanted to claim this;
I am a 1x reflexive role-copier; I will get a one-shot copy of the first power to target me. So,if you think your power is pretty damn strong especially if a second player can use it, you should target me N1.In post 320, Dwlee99 wrote:Without reading much of what TSQ said because I only got 4 hours of sleep despite popping a melatonin: firebringer wagon wasn't actually bad imo but I can see town!STD thinking it was and saying it like he did
Speaking of which:
VOTE: firebringerIn post 321, Gypyx wrote:
that's a good point, on the other hand i might be overanalyzing a crumb too, but idk, got a good but feeling from wheme doing thisIn post 318, Sharing the Brain Cell wrote:
I had a null takeaway on that because the ruleset openly limits the gens to 2 and 3, and I don't think fakeclaiming an obviously fake claim is likely to mean anything more than early-game shitposting.In post 311, Gypyx wrote:most major thing is that i doubt scum would do the charizard fake claim thingy
Also, pretty sure I know what pokemon Mastina is claiming, but not sure if there's any benefit/detriment to saying. Iwillsay I'm trying to think if there's a scummy equivalent that would want to be targeted, (something that steals your ability or something?) and I can't think of anything. So for now I'm thinking that's probably a legit town claim?
@Mastina: do you know what happens if you get targeted by multiple people in the same night?
- B.
additionally, while the claim is slightly +town, i doubt mastina's role can't be a scum role too, heck, a reflexive rolecop maybe?In post 337, mastina wrote:
I do, the interaction's laid out in my role PM. Not sure if I should share it tho. Do you think I should?In post 318, Sharing the Brain Cell wrote:@Mastina: do you know what happens if you get targeted by multiple people in the same night?In post 338, mastina wrote:(Okay that wasn't me catching up, that was me jumping ahead. But NOW catching up from page one.)In post 339, mastina wrote:VOTE: SirCakez
Even though I'm not scumreading this opening (not townreading it either but not scumreading it, is null), SirCakez draws scum in 100% of his games it seems so we may as well save him the misery of another scumgame and vote him out.In post 340, Gypyx wrote:so uh T3 apart not liking 122 from milo, anything more concrete from your catchup?In post 341, mastina wrote:In post 13, SleepyKrew wrote:I'm very happy with my assigned Pokemon.Woodyou believe that my pokemon's one of the most appropriate for me?
In post 8, Save The Dragons wrote:I wanna be the very best like no one ever wasTown.
Firebringer. (I can't read Firebringer and won't pretend that I can, tho I will say that this would be 'town' alongside the above by natural inclination.)In post 12, Firebringer wrote:VOTE: sir cakez
first person who posts is always scum. i think thats like mafia facts
Scum?In post 17, T3 wrote:
your avatar looks like a pokemonIn post 8, Save The Dragons wrote:I wanna be the very best like no one ever wasIn post 348, mastina wrote:
If it makes you feel any better, I completely and entirely forgot that I signed up for this game until I received my role PM.In post 80, Sharing the Brain Cell wrote:PS: how did I completely miss the fact mastina is in this, I definitely looked at the playerlist multiple times and definitely did not see her name there o_O
-q
Mastina's entry doesn't feel much like scum. It's chill. 337 is odd. I don't really unerstand it, because it seems designed to make Deadcell uncomfortable? But it just feels startlingly open. But that's kind of their MO at the beginning of the game anyway and they did just claim out right at the beginning. So.In post 349, Dwlee99 wrote:
locktownIn post 346, WhemeStar wrote:Im gonna full claim
I am mareep. I pick a target to sheep and when I do I become a double voter when I am sheeping that person
Gyphx is being too reasonable early. All of his takes are informed and he uses that...to town read people and push at people he knows are wrong.
Dwlee, is mostly at the periphery. I think he was just trying to avoid attention by voting FB, rather than pushing more at STD, or voting somewhere else.
-Bell- Milobird
-
Milobird Mafia Scum
- Milobird
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1683
- Joined: October 2, 2021
Ralts doesn't really stand out. He just doesn't understand what STD is saying and that's pretty much it. It's probably true regardless of his alignment. It's kind of pointless though. I guess you could stretch it and say how they're approaching STD is tip-toeing. Trying not to offend, not giving them ammunition, Not even directly asking them what they mean, but instead putting it on themselves for feeling responsible that they can't understand them. It's kind of post county buffing. But that's all a stretch to me. It's just two nothing posts I think. aybe the responsibility portion points away from them. I'm probably overthinking it.
-Bell- Milobird
-
Milobird Mafia Scum
- Milobird
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1683
- Joined: October 2, 2021
In post 350, mastina wrote:
I mean, youIn post 114, WhemeStar wrote:can we put early pressure on mastina and see their reaction?can, but it aint gonna do you much good given that I've all-but-fullclaimed already so I really don't have anything more to give ya.In post 352, mastina wrote:
I'd take that bet but I'd lose given that that's pretty much exactly the amount I'd guess would be Gamma.In post 146, Firebringer wrote:im putting on bet now that 90% of alexandrites posts will be gamma so i don't think any of u need to be worried about thinking "who is posting this?"
Oh I imagine it'd work wonders if I actually ever drew scum but since mods seem to want me to always be fairly confirmable town......In post 127, WhemeStar wrote:I still think mastina pressure is never bad
I mean, it'sIn post 131, Milobird wrote:They kind of fall apart on their own as scum lately. Though I always feel bad saying that.true, so no need to feel bad saying that, but I also tend to fall apart faster as scum when pressured so Wheme's not wrong.
I feel called out.In post 132, Thestatusquo wrote:Also in my experience pressuring mastina means she will respond to the pressure 2 weeks later when catching up and not acknowledge you continuing to talk to her in real time in the thread. She'll get to that in 2 more weeks.
...But not unjustifiably as this isalsotrue.In post 354, mastina wrote:
Speaking of random, have my readslist!In post 199, Save The Dragons wrote:seems random
Milobird
Save the Dragons
Firebringer
Thestatusquo
Truth Innuendos Lies
Sharing the Brain Cell
Kitty Trauma Team
Dwlee99
Ralts
The Goat
Gypyx
Alexandrite
chowchow
WhemeStar
Woolax
Wisdom
SleepyKrew
imaginality
T3
SirCakezIn post 355, mastina wrote:
If it helps I hated that post which immediately put imaginality in my bottom 3 reads. (Which, in spite of how I jested about the randomness of my readslist, was not in fact actually random. Well, mostly. I actually was stopping myself from posting readslists every page because I wanted to have a readslist where I manually added names as they posted rather than a readslist where I copied the names from the OP and rearranged them, but I caved in when I saw a mention of 'random' and couldn't resist.In post 229, Thestatusquo wrote:I can't decide if this a town reach or a scum reach tho.The names not posting at that point were basically random, the names having posted tho were not.)
In post 359, Gypyx wrote:thinking about it, mastina, maybe you should put a reduction to the number of peeps who should visit you? Like, restrict it to half the PL or something, cuz i doubt we'd gain much worth from 4-5 of our powerful PRs taking a shot on you on the long term
also VOTE: alexandrite less talk more scrapIn post 363, Alexandrite wrote:
good luck with this, esp with mastinaIn post 358, SleepyKrew wrote:Are you caught up now? Cool. This message is for everyone but especially T3 and mastina.
Please don't catch up like that. I'm begging you.
what does this meanIn post 359, Gypyx wrote:thinking about it, mastina, maybe you should put a reduction to the number of peeps who should visit you? Like, restrict it to half the PL or something, cuz i doubt we'd gain much worth from 4-5 of our powerful PRs taking a shot on you on the long term
also VOTE: alexandrite less talk more scrap
-Gamma
(also from this point on if there's a tag that isn't Gamma, Meg, Pearl, or Garnet, it's probably Yume)In post 364, Gypyx wrote:
honetly it doesn't mean anythingIn post 363, Alexandrite wrote:what does this meanIn post 368, Dwlee99 wrote:
They will not listen guaranteedIn post 358, SleepyKrew wrote:Are you caught up now? Cool. This message is for everyone but especially T3 and mastina.
Please don't catch up like that. I'm begging you.In post 373, Gypyx wrote:
just have mastina make an arbitrary way to separate things, if she's town we're good if she's scum we can prob read into the list she givesIn post 366, Truth Innuendos Lies wrote:
But how would that be determined? It’s not like we’re doing a mass claim on D1.In post 359, Gypyx wrote:thinking about it, mastina, maybe you should put a reduction to the number of peeps who should visit you? Like, restrict it to half the PL or something, cuz i doubt we'd gain much worth from 4-5 of our powerful PRs taking a shot on you on the long term
also VOTE: alexandrite less talk more scrap
~Innuendos
statistically it would be hard for a random list to not contain any good PR
Dwlee and Gyphx don't appear to be acknowledging the other exists.In post 374, Dwlee99 wrote:
Me next thanks. Give me the exact answer in my head and win a prizeIn post 372, SleepyKrew wrote:if anyone else needs me to tell them how to live their life just ask
Gyphx is engaging with Mastina, but they're tame questions so far.
While Dwlee doesn't appear to be acknowledging Mastina.
Those 2 scums being in the dead center of Mastina's reads though.
Tbh this is sort of atypical for Mastina, but given they haven't had much luck with their scum approach maybe they chose a more traditional scum reads list. It would be typical of anyone but Mastina to have that read's list as scum.- Milobird
-
Milobird Mafia Scum
- Milobird
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1683
- Joined: October 2, 2021
- Milobird
-
Milobird Mafia Scum
- Milobird
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1683
- Joined: October 2, 2021
Neither Gyphx nor Dwlee have engaged with Ralts, but ralt's is fairly focused and there isn't much to talk to Ralts about currently.
I don't really think anyone has reached out to Ralts at this point because nothing they've done invites that engagement outside of who they acknowledge themselves. They're being their own gate keeper. Either intentionally or not.
-Bell- Milobird
-
Milobird Mafia Scum
- Milobird
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1683
- Joined: October 2, 2021
- Milobird
-
Milobird Mafia Scum
- Milobird
- Milobird
-
Milobird Mafia Scum
- Milobird
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1683
- Joined: October 2, 2021
- Milobird
-
Milobird Mafia Scum
- Milobird
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1683
- Joined: October 2, 2021
In post 377, Gypyx wrote:well, it's true that this way of doing things lower the chances of having the best role visit (although that might not even be the case depending on the tiebreaker for multiple visits)
but like, generally, the 2nd / 3rd / even 4th best role are not gonna be significantly weaker than the very bestIn post 378, Dwlee99 wrote:
Okay who has scum claimedIn post 375, Thestatusquo wrote:Anyone posting in the thread without explicitly discussing me and std is scum claimingIn post 379, Truth Innuendos Lies wrote:
She said she default coppies first pr right? The obvious problem with that is if Mastina’s town, then if the most powerful pr visits her first, then we get double. Well, I would strongly suggest that any relatively weak prs, use their abilities elsewhere. This will ensure we get a double dose of strong tpr.In post 377, Gypyx wrote:well, it's true that this way of doing things lower the chances of having the best role visit (although that might not even be the case depending on the tiebreaker for multiple visits)
but like, generally, the 2nd / 3rd / even 4th best role are not gonna be significantly weaker than the very best
~IIn post 380, Sharing the Brain Cell wrote:
I think you know the answer to the question of "should I give out this info?" better than anyone else besides the mods, and I think that, if you're town (and we feel pretty sure you are at this juncture), you shouldn't allow others' opinions to sway you too easily in case some of those opinions come from scum who are like, idk, hunting for powerful powers or something.In post 357, mastina wrote:Then it works in the way laid out in my role PM. Will claim that interaction if more folks think it's a good idea for me to.
like, if it would be terrible for town to have too many people target you, that might be a circumstance in which you wanna fullclaim? But again, only you and the mods know that.
- q and b. we both contributed to this post. with our powers combined...???!?!?!....yeah, still only one brain cell.In post 382, Gypyx wrote:
oh yeah, obviouslyIn post 379, Truth Innuendos Lies wrote:
She said she default coppies first pr right? The obvious problem with that is if Mastina’s town, then if the most powerful pr visits her first, then we get double. Well, I would strongly suggest that any relatively weak prs, use their abilities elsewhere. This will ensure we get a double dose of strong tpr.In post 377, Gypyx wrote:well, it's true that this way of doing things lower the chances of having the best role visit (although that might not even be the case depending on the tiebreaker for multiple visits)
but like, generally, the 2nd / 3rd / even 4th best role are not gonna be significantly weaker than the very best
~IIn post 391, Thestatusquo wrote:Didn't mastina do like exactly this in ydrssal and get mod killedIn post 394, Gypyx wrote:
has Mastina changed her habit of never fake-claiming though?In post 390, Firebringer wrote:
Reflexively don't believe this either. Or extremely misleading.In post 315, mastina wrote:Yo, will be back here to read and give reads later but for now just wanted to claim this;
I am a 1x reflexive role-copier; I will get a one-shot copy of the first power to target me. So,if you think your power is pretty damn strong especially if a second player can use it, you should target me N1.
W/e
Gyphx is giving me material to work with, I just have no idea if what he's doing here is spewing Mastina or not. All I'm really getting is that he's being tentative. He's pushing back slightly by revealing true information about her. Which is in line with his earlier approach in the game a few pags ago. But is he caution preaching? Fact dumping in lieu of something better to do?In post 396, Wisdom wrote:Looking at mastina's claim, why are we speculating what happens if multiple roles target her? She already said she copies just the first one (according to resolution I'm assuming)
-Bell- Milobird
-
Milobird Mafia Scum
- Milobird
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1683
- Joined: October 2, 2021
This isn't how statistics work.In post 6204, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:every flipped replacement in this game is town so your statistics are garbage
-Bell- Milobird
-
Milobird Mafia Scum
- Milobird
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1683
- Joined: October 2, 2021
- Milobird
-
Milobird Mafia Scum
- Milobird
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1683
- Joined: October 2, 2021
I appreciate that Pooky. But nah. I enjoy the puzzle. Like I play mafia for this part. I like getting to know people and I like solving. Even if I can't be assed to.
I'm just going to keep on doing this. Though I'm probably going to take a break soon for the day since I've spent a lot of time on this already.
-Bell- Milobird
-
Milobird Mafia Scum
- Milobird
- Milobird
-
Milobird Mafia Scum
- Milobird
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1683
- Joined: October 2, 2021
- Milobird
-
Milobird Mafia Scum
- Milobird
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1683
- Joined: October 2, 2021
- Milobird
-
Milobird Mafia Scum
- Milobird
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1683
- Joined: October 2, 2021
In post 400, Firebringer wrote:What worries me most about mastina is she reads me as town in this game.In post 425, Milobird wrote:Town: Shea, maybe STD, slappykrew, esuriohydra
Scum: mastina, whemestar
I’ll be here all week thanksIn post 436, Firebringer wrote:
lol noIn post 433, Truth Innuendos Lies wrote:Reading Mastina correctly in this game is super important considering her claim.In post 487, imaginality wrote:I don't understand this series of posts.
Was STD not genuinely counter claiming?In post 503, imaginality wrote:
Everyone decide whether your power is likely in the top 5 town powers. If no, don't target mastina.In post 366, Truth Innuendos Lies wrote:
But how would that be determined? It’s not like we’re doing a mass claim on D1.In post 359, Gypyx wrote:thinking about it, mastina, maybe you should put a reduction to the number of peeps who should visit you? Like, restrict it to half the PL or something, cuz i doubt we'd gain much worth from 4-5 of our powerful PRs taking a shot on you on the long term
also VOTE: alexandrite less talk more scrap
~Innuendos
If yes, generate a random number 1-100. If your random number is > 50 target mastina otherwise don't.
That should result in a few but not too many strong town powers targeting mastina without having to list their names publicly in advance.
Threshold can be adjusted according to how sure we want to be at least one town player targets mastina, and what proportion of players are likely to follow this approach vs ignore it.
Uhh. Nothing really interesting happened here. Imaginality leaning into theory, acting sort of like a brick.In post 566, Dwlee99 wrote:you thought you could get one past me calling it "meat" instead of meta but I'm onto you
Obligatory: i can meat read std very well
Did I mention that I have 9 days off of work which is why I'm spamming, or why I'm able to devote so much time to this,
I mean besides it being elo.
I feel like I did, but I want to mention that because I think Sircakez said it was weird or something that I was suddenly trying (it's actually not weird).
-Bell- Milobird
-
Milobird Mafia Scum
- Milobird
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1683
- Joined: October 2, 2021
- Milobird
-
Milobird Mafia Scum
- Milobird
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1683
- Joined: October 2, 2021
Like, all I'm going to do is.
1. Make a narrative for Town & Scum, Pooky and Mastina.
2. Make a narrative for how each scum chose to present themselves and how that fits into their interactions with either of you.
3. Use all the time left going over all the posts to make that narrative.
4. Pick which one of you is more likely to be scum based on the narratives and then broken record ask you to cross vote each other and then make a case for one another.
@Mastina:
@Pooky:
Question for the day, ya'll have read death curse.
Ya'll have read Pooky versus Flavorleaf.
I know Mastina hasn't really had the opportunity to really dig into these recent posts.
But there's a pretty clear wall between what I'm capable of making myself do as town versus scum.
In death curse: I tried at the end.
In Pooky Versus FlavorLeaf: I promised to try at the end when I was cornered but it never materialized because I can't lie good.
Why can I suddenly lie good?
-Bell- Milobird
-
Milobird Mafia Scum
- Milobird
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1683
- Joined: October 2, 2021
In post 577, Dwlee99 wrote:
@TSQIn post 378, Dwlee99 wrote:
Okay who has scum claimedIn post 375, Thestatusquo wrote:Anyone posting in the thread without explicitly discussing me and std is scum claimingIn post 584, Dwlee99 wrote:
VOTE: TILIn post 574, Truth Innuendos Lies wrote:
VOTE: SleepyKrewIn post 532, Truth Innuendos Lies wrote:
VOTE: TILIn post 526, SleepyKrew wrote:
ah yes not_mafia, the snarky scummer.In post 524, Milobird wrote:I have trained under miltank for many a year for this snark
VOTE: TIL
lockscum
You spelled town wrong.
~IIn post 634, Woolax wrote:is there anyone else in this game you'd attribute > random reads to?
micc
predit: yeah still jiving with tsqIn post 639, Milobird wrote:Levels of engagement, genuine engagement with the game and I enjoy the old man screaming at clouds, and cake has found stuff to pounce on and chase which is prob town from him
@fireIn post 643, Woolax wrote:In post 646, Woolax wrote:
yeah, its something I'd like to file away and probably come back to later.In post 637, Firebringer wrote:did u ask this thinking it would help u read TIL?
yes, the question was to you. can you answer it?In post 640, Truth Innuendos Lies wrote:If this is to me. it’s based off of experience playing with both Wisdom and Hectic
miccIn post 661, Woolax wrote:Save The Dragons is the only leading wagon I understand at this point. Haven't seen a case to the Brain Cell or Milobird votes.
Firebringer had some votes but the wagon quickly died off. Not interested in voting there.
the brief chowchow wagon was fine. I don't see voting people who are strictly here to meme as productive, but I am generally on board to policy lim them sooner rather than later.
nancy not answering the questing is kinda irritating but very much in line with what I'd expect.
miccIn post 666, Gypyx wrote:
well, to be fair, pretty sure that gimmick isn't even alignement indicative right ? besides that's like 5 posts into the doggo guy's ISO at the time you're saying this, that's barely even callable as an iso lolIn post 411, Sharing the Brain Cell wrote:I'm WIFOMing myself here, but I do wonder if scum would be this obstinate about continuing to do the blatantly anti-town thing.
and then that most recent post.
hmm.
yeah okay whatever back to this for now
VOTE: STD
-qIn post 668, Gypyx wrote:unrelated to my previous quote btw, just realized
Micc: Doing the bare minimum. I shall post about all of the events currently. I shall state my opinions on them and then I shall go on lunch break and do it again. Lunch break scum. They're actually kind of contentless here. I should've had more red flags based on that. I was mostly waiting for the worst to post since I know they hate being scum. But I don't think they ever did.In post 670, imaginality wrote:
Then why didn't you change your vote back?In post 650, SleepyKrew wrote:
damn wish I saw this before I changed my voteIn post 648, Thestatusquo wrote:
sorry prolly notIn post 638, SleepyKrew wrote:shea I danced for you are you going to respond to that
Gyphx: still doing the reasonable shtick.
The whole scum team is ignoring each other and not even throwing soft ball questions at each other. The only exception so far might be Gyphx.
-Bell
-Bell- Milobird
-
Milobird Mafia Scum
- Milobird
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1683
- Joined: October 2, 2021
- Milobird
-
Milobird Mafia Scum
- Milobird
- Milobird
-
Milobird Mafia Scum
- Milobird
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1683
- Joined: October 2, 2021
In post 676, Milobird wrote:What makes you think Wisdom is a scumread of mine?
Wheme is based off his (lack of) engagement with the game- all he’s successfully done is Shit posted despite there being plenty to dig into. I’m unimpressed by mastinas readslist, but this could change with more from her.
Now that I’ve acknowledged it’s not wisdom- who do you think my third is?
Ninja-
Aye matey, ye should know how slippery I be. It be from covering meself in moss off the starboard bow.In post 686, Gypyx wrote:
while i'm certainely glad to have doublevoter status, i think i'm fine with my vote on Alexandrite being removedIn post 680, May and Brendan wrote:In post 696, Firebringer wrote:
ive never understood this because scum are going to do it. also i kind of think its a joke because is "wood" really a crumb....knowing mastina it probably is but w/eIn post 690, Milobird wrote:Yeah if we could not publicly decoder ring crumbs that would be great?In post 698, T3 wrote:
This open admission also probably comes from town.In post 364, Gypyx wrote:
honetly it doesn't mean anythingIn post 363, Alexandrite wrote:what does this meanIn post 702, T3 wrote:
I've never played with town Gypyx but this doesn't particularly feel like scum gypyx.In post 373, Gypyx wrote:
just have mastina make an arbitrary way to separate things, if she's town we're good if she's scum we can prob read into the list she givesIn post 366, Truth Innuendos Lies wrote:
But how would that be determined? It’s not like we’re doing a mass claim on D1.In post 359, Gypyx wrote:thinking about it, mastina, maybe you should put a reduction to the number of peeps who should visit you? Like, restrict it to half the PL or something, cuz i doubt we'd gain much worth from 4-5 of our powerful PRs taking a shot on you on the long term
also VOTE: alexandrite less talk more scrap
~Innuendos
statistically it would be hard for a random list to not contain any good PRIn post 704, Thestatusquo wrote:Not to be mean but basically my experience in games I've played with/observed of town mastina I'll just take her town Poe and eliminate all of them and win the game.In post 711, Firebringer wrote:Lets put these pokemon into boxes for storage:
pokemon im carrying around: (i cant trust these people to be town and wont wipe in nuzlocke)
TheStatusQuo, T3, Save The Dragons
Pokemon in Box 1 (the backups. People im feeling okay about or don't want to worry about)
Whemestar, Wisdom, Milobird, mastina
Pokemon in Box 2 (the third string. People who i know exist but are like just there)
dwlee99, imaginality, alexandrite, Ralts, Gypx, Woolax, Cakez
Pokemon in Box 3 (never picked. People i want to grill or trade to another trainer)
The Goat, SleepyKrew, Sharing the Brain Cell, Kitty Trauma Team, Truth Innuendo Lies, ChowChowIn post 723, Firebringer wrote:
Good thing a bad read has never stopped me from continuing to play. I would have stopped playing long agoIn post 722, Truth Innuendos Lies wrote:
Your read on me apparently hasn’t improved since Doubles.In post 720, Firebringer wrote:i feel like theres always at least one scum who speculates on game mechanics instead of actually interacting with the game. TIL could be that scum
~I
You guys have no idea how much Notty was fixating on the fact Mala wasn't interacting with him. >.> He just town binned them in the end though before they cleared themselves and made it mute. >.>In post 748, Milobird wrote:MALA COME BACK I WAS PLAYING LEAGUE
also your vote is bad pls fix and vote wheme
-BellIn post 749, Milobird wrote:Yeah, after Iso'ing Gyphx, I pretty much agree that Gyphx is obvscum this game.
Why isn't he dead yet?
-Bell- Milobird
-
Milobird Mafia Scum
- Milobird
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1683
- Joined: October 2, 2021
I've been interacting with you all day, while making shit up. But it's distracting and you keep trying to define me and I have a low self-esteem so I can't really just brush off characterizations like a good adult can.In post 6225, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:"tells me to fuck off so he can make up some bullshit narrative about me being scum"
"claims i'm being rude"
ok buddy. I'll let you get 24 hours without me in thread to do your thing since apparently you can't even interact while making shit up
-Bell- Milobird
-
Milobird Mafia Scum
- Milobird
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1683
- Joined: October 2, 2021
It's not like I can't point out the flaws in every argument you make. We've both played mafia a lot and are excellent at arguing.
Hah, okay, neither of us are actually good at arguing, but you know what I mean.
We're at home arguing with people and arguing about stuff that's barely coherent.
Like for example, you keep asking me why I'm trying to do a song and dance. But you've never considered if you're town that it's just me trying to solve, that there are a million other approaches I could be doing that would be less time intensive and less soul sucking because you know I hate being scum, so why would I want to subject myself to more of it here. Because you have a case on mastina town, somewhere. This is a point against you. There are a lot of points against you.
You're frictionless except for the player you want to kill,
while we're the opposite of that and it should be a pretty clear sign which of us is scum tbh. You're just trying to win I can respect that.
But I'd like to just check my corners and think about it and then make a nice little narrative and bow as to who's scum and why and who is town and why.
I enjoy doing that.
I don't enjoy doing that as scum. >.> Literally everyone including you knows this.
-Bell- Milobird
-
Milobird Mafia Scum
- Milobird
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1683
- Joined: October 2, 2021
- Milobird
-
Milobird Mafia Scum
- Milobird
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1683
- Joined: October 2, 2021
I won't lie, half the time I'm just so dumbfounded by what you're saying that I don't even know where to start correcting you, but I think rather than you just having sudden comprehension issues, you're just probably scum.
But I wanna go back and do it the way I like solving. I mean there's a reason I'm a waffler and it's not because I'm confident in myself. It takes a lot for me to be comfortable in my own reads. I never really feel like I'm trying to understand until elo actually just because there's so much data and the choices are so narrow that it feels like I can finally have a chance to comprehend it.
-Bell- Milobird
-
Milobird Mafia Scum
- Milobird
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1683
- Joined: October 2, 2021
- Milobird
-
Milobird Mafia Scum
- Milobird
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1683
- Joined: October 2, 2021
In post 750, Alexandrite wrote:VOTE: gypyx
he pinged me early so I'm very down for this wagon
-GammaIn post 751, mastina wrote:
I mean the problem with that is, the only way we'd have to know who should be the PR targeting me is if we had a D1 massclaim--with that obviously being something we shouldn't do, that means we have no way of coordinating it. We don't know who the best person to target me would be. And we have no way of limiting the number of players targeting me, either.In post 359, Gypyx wrote:thinking about it, mastina, maybe you should put a reduction to the number of peeps who should visit you? Like, restrict it to half the PL or something, cuz i doubt we'd gain much worth from 4-5 of our powerful PRs taking a shot on you on the long term
So my solution was just to leave it to the PRs in question, that if they think their role is strong especially with a second person getting a 1x copy of it, to have them target me.In post 752, mastina wrote:
Nope!In post 394, Gypyx wrote:has Mastina changed her habit of never fake-claiming though?
I've made my stance on that modkill being bullshit quite clear.In post 391, Thestatusquo wrote:Didn't mastina do like exactly this in ydrssal and get mod killed
Actually I'd say it's closer to the opposite.In post 375, Thestatusquo wrote:Anyone posting in the thread without explicitly discussing me and std is scum claiming
I am aware that both you and STD are experienced enough scum players to make a SvS or SvT fight look TvT, HOWEVER:
I think you are town by your posting;
I think STD is town by his posting;
I think the fight between you and STD looks town on both ends;
I think the people who have said the fight is TvT directly are, overall, a groupmorelikely to contain scum rather than less.In post 753, Ralts wrote:
That conclusion seems backwards given the sentences before this.In post 752, mastina wrote:I am aware that both you and STD are experienced enough scum players to make a SvS or SvT fight look TvT, HOWEVER:
I think you are town by your posting;
I think STD is town by his posting;
I think the fight between you and STD looks town on both ends;
I think the people who have said the fight is TvT directly are, overall, a group more likely to contain scum rather than less.
Did anyone in this group catch your eye?In post 755, mastina wrote:
I admit I'm not happy about the amount of nulls and I'm not happy how weak my townreads are.In post 432, Milobird wrote:I don’t like her readslist.
However, I am actuallyquiteconfident in my scumreads.
I talked about imaginality already, but my thoughts on T3 were immediately that this looked like T3's scum meta rather than his town meta. I'm not positive, obviously, so I'm less sure of T3 being scum than I was, but I'm still leaning scum meta more than town meta.
As for SirCakez?
I wasn't joking when I said that I legitimately, genuinely, think that SirCakez is just scum this game. I think this is SirCakez's scum meta as literally every post of his is screaming "this is SirCakez as scum". But beyond the generic things, I can actually point you to something more specific that I found highly damning:
If SirCakez were town, the response from my post saying "he's always scum so we may as well vote him out" I would expect to be: "In post 356, SirCakez wrote:
fuck this is like Peta and I's dynamicIn post 339, mastina wrote:VOTE: SirCakez
Even though I'm not scumreading this opening (not townreading it either but not scumreading it, is null), SirCakez draws scum in 100% of his games it seems so we may as well save him the misery of another scumgame and vote him out.", or maybe "
".
Though not as town as he could do it as scum as well, it could even have ben "lol".
It's something that, if SirCakez were town, I'd expect him to take in good humor, laugh along, and find amusing.
But this response was basically dead serious, and the dead serious treatment of the "SirCakez is always scum", rather than treating it in good humor, is what makes me think that SirCakez is scum here.
So my vote there is dead serious.In post 758, mastina wrote:
This seems like a good time to mention I'm back to thinking T3's scum by meta.In post 583, T3 wrote:
hmmmmmmIn post 315, mastina wrote:Yo, will be back here to read and give reads later but for now just wanted to claim this;
I am a 1x reflexive role-copier; I will get a one-shot copy of the first power to target me. So,if you think your power is pretty damn strong especially if a second player can use it, you should target me N1.
Milobird
Save the Dragons
Firebringer
Thestatusquo
Wisdom
Truth Innuendos Lies
Sharing the Brain Cell
WhemeStar
Kitty Trauma Team
Dwlee99
Ralts
Alexandrite
The Goat
Gypyx
chowchow
Woolax
SleepyKrew
imaginality
T3
SirCakezIn post 759, Ralts wrote:
Like ever?In post 757, T3 wrote:
mastina doesn't fakeclaimIn post 390, Firebringer wrote:
Reflexively don't believe this either. Or extremely misleading.In post 315, mastina wrote:Yo, will be back here to read and give reads later but for now just wanted to claim this;
I am a 1x reflexive role-copier; I will get a one-shot copy of the first power to target me. So,if you think your power is pretty damn strong especially if a second player can use it, you should target me N1.
W/e
I thought her claim could've been a PGO ploy given how she doesn't seem willing to narrow down the list of people who should target her, even though her role presumably can only copy one other role.
but if this is actually true, mastina should be out of the d1 lim pool.In post 768, mastina wrote:In post 696, Firebringer wrote:is "wood" really a crumb....knowing mastina it probably is but w/eWoodn't you like to know.
I don't. T3's posts just are lacking something to them. The content within is fine, it's just that the content is just...lacking something that T3 has as town.In post 700, Firebringer wrote:I think T3 is town now.In post 771, Ralts wrote:Can you go into your thought process here? You thought STD was scummy and a couple of your townreads were also voting there. Why is Wisdom's post enough to override that?
This whole thing is interesting.In post 774, mastina wrote:
It's not backwards, because in a TvT fight the scum are more likely going to say "this fight is TvT" and do nothing about it--I realize I didn't work to defuse it, and I realize there could be and will be town who similarly didn't work to defuse it, but I still think that there would be scum who just called it TvT and did nothing about it.In post 753, Ralts wrote:
That conclusion seems backwards given the sentences before this.In post 752, mastina wrote:I am aware that both you and STD are experienced enough scum players to make a SvS or SvT fight look TvT, HOWEVER:
I think you are town by your posting;
I think STD is town by his posting;
I think the fight between you and STD looks town on both ends;
I think the people who have said the fight is TvT directly are, overall, a group more likely to contain scum rather than less.
Did anyone in this group catch your eye?
I'd need to go back to that section of the game to check for the names more likely to be scum calling it TvT tho.
751 Once again, could probably figure out whether this is scum talking to scum or not if I were better. It's sort of just Mastina's lecture mode. Which is usually her default interaction style. I've never really gone indepth with how she talks to her scum partners in game.
Ralts comes in and points out that Mastina might be contradicting herself, but she predictably bowls right over this.
There's something a little funny about her using the adverbs, legitimately and genuinely to describe her suspicions of Sircakez here. I'm not sure they would place so much emphasis on this if they were actually scum. It's kind of on the nose.
She points to one thing that she found "highly damning" which I'm not sure she'd ever post as scum either. It's also a little bit sooner than is typical for scum mastina to start biting down on someone. But scheduling maybe.
Woolax just kind of pops in at the periphery to make a side comment. I guess they either don't know how to engage or just wanna make a snide post. I mean snide in a nice way. Er, if there is such a thing. It's mildly humorous.
Aside: I have no idea how to tell the difference between a TVT, TVS, SVS fight. Mostly I just interfere if it's partiuclarly toxic and I feel safe doing so and the timing is okay. Sometimes I just can't be assed, other times I feel like I've been invited or at least feel safe judging an interaction and can make a pot saying that the interaction isn't helpful without worrying about it.
-Bell- Milobird
-
Milobird Mafia Scum
- Milobird
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1683
- Joined: October 2, 2021
- Milobird
-
Milobird Mafia Scum
- Milobird
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1683
- Joined: October 2, 2021
- Milobird
-
Milobird Mafia Scum
- Milobird
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1683
- Joined: October 2, 2021
- Milobird
-
Milobird Mafia Scum
- Milobird
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1683
- Joined: October 2, 2021
In post 777, Sharing the Brain Cell wrote:Can you elaborate on this? I'll concede my read on Gypyx is mostly a gut feeling, so it would be great to know if you've got anything more concrete.
Unless it's meta. I'm not jumping down rabbit holes trying to meta a fuckton of people I don't know.
- B.In post 778, Ralts wrote:
Not really sold on StD, but aside from that, I vibe with these reads.In post 769, Sharing the Brain Cell wrote:PEDIT: T3 is a leanscum too but I think my confidence goes STD >> Whemestar >>>>> Gypyx >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> T3.In post 779, Milobird wrote:Er, it's day 1. All you have is gut.
And my gut tells me that I will never ever let Gyphx live this game. Do it now because I won't ever shut up about this until he flips red or flips green and I accuse the moderator of lying.
-BellIn post 788, Ralts wrote:
I think ignoring it and doing something else is another way of defusing, but I don't think it's necessary to harp on this point. I'm more interested in seeing what names you come up with!In post 774, mastina wrote:It's not backwards, because in a TvT fight the scum are more likely going to say "this fight is TvT" and do nothing about it--I realize I didn't work to defuse it, and I realize there could be and will be town who similarly didn't work to defuse it, but I still think that there would be scum who just called it TvT and did nothing about it.
I'd need to go back to that section of the game to check for the names more likely to be scum calling it TvT tho.
NopeIn post 783, Thestatusquo wrote:
Wait but didn't you vote std?In post 754, Ralts wrote:Also I too got TvT vibes from TSQ and STD's posting
pedit: I'll vote when I'm all caught up. I'm in the early 20sIn post 791, Thestatusquo wrote:Yo bell come talk to me. Can I please get some words so i can maybe at least take a look at your meta read on my own?
In post 792, Firebringer wrote:is the goat an alt of someone
I do not like that Ralts ignores the Gyphx conversation here.In post 795, Milobird wrote:
Gyphx auto pilots as scum and needs an entire team of committed mafia players to keep him afloat.In post 791, Thestatusquo wrote:Yo bell come talk to me. Can I please get some words so i can maybe at least take a look at your meta read on my own?
Prolly not happening here.
Ergo he's scum because his tone is lifeless, his posts stringy and full of phlegm. Gyphx town is focused after the jokes.
He's meandering here and letting the world pass him by.
-Bell
This is a point against them. Everyone else pays attention. Ralts pretends it doesn't exist.
-Bell- Milobird
-
Milobird Mafia Scum
- Milobird
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1683
- Joined: October 2, 2021
- Milobird
-
Milobird Mafia Scum
- Milobird
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1683
- Joined: October 2, 2021
In post 801, Milobird wrote:Whelp. I said my piece.
It's up to you if you wanna vote him or not.
*shrug*
-BellIn post 802, Thestatusquo wrote:Ok but did you think that interaction felt that way?In post 804, Ralts wrote:VOTE: Gyphx
I feel like I usually have stronger reads by nowbut this is fine.
In post 806, Milobird wrote:
Your discussion with them isn't deep enough for me to hesitate.In post 802, Thestatusquo wrote:Ok but did you think that interaction felt that way?
-BellIn post 808, Ralts wrote:This list is roughly what I'm working off of:
Town
Milo, TSQ, Alexandrite
Brain Cell, Wisdom, StD, mastina
Everyone else
SleepyKrew, Wheme, TIL
Gypyx, T3
ScumIn post 812, Ralts wrote:Not the worst group to be inIn post 816, Ralts wrote:Gamma is one of the few people I can metaread. I've played with him a lot, and I feel pretty good about his posting and tone here.In post 817, Milobird wrote:*takes of sunglasses*
Is sircakez finally town?
*pokes him to see if he's real*
-Bell
@Thanks mod friend.In post 818, Firebringer wrote:
any specific posts u want to call attention toIn post 816, Ralts wrote:Gamma is one of the few people I can metaread. I've played with him a lot, and I feel pretty good about his posting and tone here.In post 819, Milobird wrote:
Welcome to like 5 pages agoIn post 817, Milobird wrote:*takes of sunglasses*
Is sircakez finally town?
*pokes him to see if he's real*
-Bell
@Thanks mod friend.
I like Ralts readslist despite disagreeing witH 3 of his scumpool.In post 820, Ralts wrote:
If it makes you feel better, it's not that I haven't noticed you, but rather I'm not sure how to sort you.In post 814, Firebringer wrote:but i have no strong opinions on u either so im not gonna sit here and complain about being null
And it's more of a general vibe that Gamma's happy to be here. Content wise, I guess I liked his vote on Gypyx.
Spoiler: A couple of tonally towny Gamma postsIn post 821, Ralts wrote:Which 3?
I spoke too soon, they do acknowledge the existence of suspicion on Gyphx with these posts and vote them. But they do not directly contribute to this conversation. Instead they start conversing with others about others.In post 824, Ralts wrote:TIL ehh admittedly my weakest scumlean in the bottom tiers, but their vote on StD and subsequent unvote gave me the impression that they didn't have that much conviction in their vote/reads. Possibly a pocketing attempt too now that I think about it.
SleepyKrew off the top of my head I don't recall what he's done except nitpick at other people's playstyles.
T3 is mostly there for anti mindmeld.
The perspective on 824 is odd. It shows a wide range, that they're paying attention, but their focus what they're actually commenting about is non-committal. Their strongest reasoned stance if Gamma, but they don't comment on us, just put us at the top of the town pile. I don't even think they've interacted with us, even though Notty acknowledged them.
I can't really tell if they're spreading their feelers/branching out as scum and weak sauce bussing, while positioning themselves after a possible Gyphx flip or not. Though they continue their trend of always being 3rd~4th vote on a player and hiding behind the reasoning of others.
-Bell
-Bell- Milobird
-
Milobird Mafia Scum
- Milobird
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1683
- Joined: October 2, 2021
- Milobird
-
Milobird Mafia Scum
- Milobird
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1683
- Joined: October 2, 2021
mmm. 6 minutes after my post is their first post and they acknowledge the Gyphx pressure without asking about it or saying much about it an hour later, just voting them. It's entirely possible they're just spending that entire hour weighing whether it would be natural for them to bus there and what they would like to do with it. Ultimately they just took the normal newbie route. 'I can't ignore this, but I don't want to add to it. Let me make a reads list. I'm feeling the pressure let me start talking to others and build some influence because the game is sort of getting away from us.'
-Bell- Milobird
-
Milobird Mafia Scum
- Milobird
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1683
- Joined: October 2, 2021
I don't think anybody has objected. I'm fine letting the candle burn out on its own. I'm having fun.In post 6240, Titus wrote:I'm so detached and the "no u" posts aren't helping. I'll hopefully get in and decide who I think should die.
I still strongly favor a no elimination.
The dead chat is probably chiding me for missing the obvious.
-Bell- Milobird
-
Milobird Mafia Scum
- Milobird
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1683
- Joined: October 2, 2021
In post 833, Milobird wrote:Hi kuribo! Could I interest you in a gypyx wagon?In post 837, Thestatusquo wrote:It kind of feels like you've been weirdly me focused this game dwlee. Do you have thoughts and questions for the other players in the game?In post 838, Gypyx wrote:
so you're more likely to be scum according to your own words?In post 752, mastina wrote:
I am aware that both you and STD are experienced enough scum players to make a SvS or SvT fight look TvT, HOWEVER:
I think you are town by your posting;
I think STD is town by his posting;
I think the fight between you and STD looks town on both ends;
I think the people who have said the fight is TvT directly are, overall, a groupmorelikely to contain scum rather than less.
edit while reading further : yeah okay saw your answer to ralts, not a huge fan of admitting that you yourself are scummy but like i don't know how to play mafia so idkIn post 839, Gypyx wrote:
yeah but the problem is like, if we have 4-5 of our most powerful roles stack up on ya (which seems quite like a realistic thing to occur given the openeness of what could happen), it probably won't be of much worth in the end, because we essentially trade 3-4 night actions in exchange for hoping you're town and will use those well, see what i mean?In post 751, mastina wrote:
I mean the problem with that is, the only way we'd have to know who should be the PR targeting me is if we had a D1 massclaim--with that obviously being something we shouldn't do, that means we have no way of coordinating it. We don't know who the best person to target me would be. And we have no way of limiting the number of players targeting me, either.In post 359, Gypyx wrote:thinking about it, mastina, maybe you should put a reduction to the number of peeps who should visit you? Like, restrict it to half the PL or something, cuz i doubt we'd gain much worth from 4-5 of our powerful PRs taking a shot on you on the long term
So my solution was just to leave it to the PRs in question, that if they think their role is strong especially with a second person getting a 1x copy of it, to have them target me.In post 840, Gypyx wrote:
well, if you're scared to the point of "deep anxiety" or sumthin' then how come you're talking about it like that withoutIn post 828, SirCakez wrote:I'm scared if i talk about people town reading me that they will stop town reading me
I legit play my town games like scum half the time because I get miselimmed so much
feels less like a preemptive apology (which eh, i guess it would be worth a slight townlean) and more like you're trying to publically project what your town mindset would beIn post 841, Gypyx wrote:ya no worries, see what you mean there, altho it's been 3 months since i haven't had a real game of mafia, so i dunno, seems like pretty outdated meta to me?
In post 842, Dwlee99 wrote:
Damn, thought maybe something in all those pages changed your mindIn post 836, Thestatusquo wrote:Yeah. Still haven't seen a reason why any of his reaction to me was town.
You're always around when I check the game. To have more thoughts I feel like I need to do more than skim the past few pages or just wait for more stuff to happen. Gypyx had the same reaction to that mastina post as me when I read the quote which is goodIn post 837, Thestatusquo wrote:It kind of feels like you've been weirdly me focused this game dwlee. Do you have thoughts and questions for the other players in the game?In post 843, imaginality wrote:
The approach I proposed in #503 would avoid that issue.In post 839, Gypyx wrote:
yeah but the problem is like, if we have 4-5 of our most powerful roles stack up on ya (which seems quite like a realistic thing to occur given the openeness of what could happen), it probably won't be of much worth in the end, because we essentially trade 3-4 night actions in exchange for hoping you're town and will use those well, see what i mean?In post 751, mastina wrote: -snip-In post 844, Dwlee99 wrote:
My response to this plan is who caresIn post 843, imaginality wrote:
The approach I proposed in #503 would avoid that issue.In post 839, Gypyx wrote:
yeah but the problem is like, if we have 4-5 of our most powerful roles stack up on ya (which seems quite like a realistic thing to occur given the openeness of what could happen), it probably won't be of much worth in the end, because we essentially trade 3-4 night actions in exchange for hoping you're town and will use those well, see what i mean?In post 751, mastina wrote: -snip-In post 846, imaginality wrote:I don't like Gypyx and Ralts jumping on mastina's comment about the people who see TSQ v STD as TvT being more likely scum than not.
It seemed like deliberately reading the comment in the worst way.
Ralts raised it as a question whereas Gypyx continued to paint it as though mastina was calling herself scummy even after reading mastina's reply to Ralts. Which, like, I don't see why Gypyx bothers to post that as town, but as scum it is a chance to splash a bit of dirt on someone.
VOTE: Gypyx
On STD v TSQ my initial take was slightly suspicious of STD and pro town on TSQ. Someone mentioned TSQ plays like that as scum also so that tempers my town read slightly but I still like his side of it. Still figuring out how I feel about the STD side of it. I didn't see the initial post as scummy but the initial reaction to TSQ's pressure did feel a bit hmmm... Like, I didn't like the retrofitting 'oh but look at the reactions I generated' part of the conversation. However there was also a hint of confused 'what are you on about'-ness to it.
Interesting also at Gypyx defended STD against TSQ early in that debate.In post 847, imaginality wrote:Oh cool add Dwlee99 to Gypyx and Ralts on the pile of "scum shiftily sniffing for stuff to stir up so as to subtly scatter some sneaky suspicion on seemingly stand-up citizens"
846 Imaginality is nightmare fuel. He pushes Ralts and Gyphx, but votes Gyphx. Both Ralts and Gyphx latch unto Mastina saying they're acting scummy. Gyphx pushes Mastina while also discrediting himself by saying he sucks. He is, in effect, doing exactly what imaginality said, Gyphx is shading Mastina. But why. Why bring it up at all. Why Poke at town Ralts, but vote Gyphx? Are they setting them up for a miselim later? Why is Gyphx jumping on Mastina's comment, which is an absurdly low hanging fruit if they're partners? Are they trying to call it out for cred later, or damage minimizing? Does Gyphx focus on interacting with his scum partner more than pretty much any other player in the game?In post 848, Wisdom wrote:I like Imaginality for town I think
I don't think Gypyx is scummy but eh, not objecting either
-Bell
Dwlee is largely doing nothing, they're totally contentless at this point.- Milobird
-
Milobird Mafia Scum
- Milobird
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1683
- Joined: October 2, 2021
Imaginality is a weird player.
I still can't decide whether Gyphx would be interacting with Mastina this much if they were scum together. Rather, whether that's relevant or an easy fix. Gyphx used kid gloves with pretty much everyone, so it's difficult to tell. If he's pulling his punches for Mastina specifically or if he's just trying not to stand out by taking significant stances.
-Bell - Milobird
- Milobird
- Milobird
- Milobird
- Milobird
- Milobird
- Milobird
- Milobird
- Milobird
- Milobird
- Milobird
- Milobird
- Milobird
- Milobird
- Milobird
- Milobird
- Milobird
- Milobird
- Milobird
- Milobird
- Milobird
- Milobird
- Milobird
- Milobird
- Milobird
- Milobird
- Milobird
- Milobird
- Milobird
- Milobird
- Milobird
- Milobird
- Milobird
- Milobird
- Milobird
- Milobird
- Milobird
- Milobird
- Milobird
- Milobird
- Milobird
- Milobird
- Milobird
- Milobird
- Milobird
- Milobird
- Milobird
- Milobird
- Milobird
- Milobird
- Milobird
- Milobird
- Milobird
- Milobird