Mafiascum.net

Idk one?

Bruh

There were two in March alone

In post 787, Shuichi Saihara wrote:

In post 779, Dwlee99 wrote:I wouldn't be surprised if enchant was scum just watching this go down

[dwlee vote intensifies]

THis is exactly what I expect scum to conclude here. It's lazy.

Dwlee is incredibly lazy as both alignments.

Might actually be town indicative because I think there are easier paths for scum!them to take actually.

In post 792, Dwlee99 wrote:

In post 787, Shuichi Saihara wrote:

In post 779, Dwlee99 wrote:I wouldn't be surprised if enchant was scum just watching this go down

[dwlee vote intensifies]

THis is exactly what I expect scum to conclude here. It's lazy.

Do you expect me to not think it is /possible/ enchant is just vibing through this as scum? Conclude is a uh very strong word for my post

No, but I do expect you to develop more interesting takes. I think it's possible too, but I don't really care right now.

In post 803, Aristeia wrote:

In post 787, Shuichi Saihara wrote:

In post 779, Dwlee99 wrote:I wouldn't be surprised if enchant was scum just watching this go down

[dwlee vote intensifies]

THis is exactly what I expect scum to conclude here. It's lazy.

Dwlee is incredibly lazy as both alignments.

Might actually be town indicative because I think there are easier paths for scum!them to take actually.

Damn

In post 804, Shuichi Saihara wrote:

In post 792, Dwlee99 wrote:

In post 787, Shuichi Saihara wrote:

In post 779, Dwlee99 wrote:I wouldn't be surprised if enchant was scum just watching this go down

[dwlee vote intensifies]

THis is exactly what I expect scum to conclude here. It's lazy.

Do you expect me to not think it is /possible/ enchant is just vibing through this as scum? Conclude is a uh very strong word for my post

No, but I do expect you to develop more interesting takes. I think it's possible too, but I don't really care right now.

The interesting takes have all been fleshed out imo

We had the prism skitter thingy, someone mentioned what if Ari/prism, we had people talking about Datisi being scum and with baltar or something, maybe it's just enchant with someone else.

What's your read on Prism currently?

I think Prism is mildly townie but I wouldn't mind flipping cause ascetic claim + scary + novice mailman

What have you found mildly townie about Prism?

no uh I liked their read on Enchant but only if enchant is actually town.

do you think Prism says that about Enchant if they are S/S?

Yes maybe, could have even suggested he say the thing he posted

Alright if I don't get to this game tonight burn down my house and then catboi's

Also skitter's

don't have the energy for mafia right now, will be here tomorrow

In post 813, Prism wrote:Alright if I don't get to this game tonight burn down my house and then catboi's

Can we start now?

If you start in reverse order yeah

Kill enchant pls

In post 815, Datisi wrote:don't have the energy for mafia right now, will be here tomorrow

Hope everyone is having a great Easter weekend

In post 808, Dwlee99 wrote:I think Prism is mildly townie but I wouldn't mind flipping cause ascetic claim + scary + novice mailman

In post 809, Aristeia wrote:What have you found mildly townie about Prism?

In post 810, Dwlee99 wrote:

their tilt

no uh I liked their read on Enchant but only if enchant is actually town.

In post 818, Dwlee99 wrote:Kill enchant pls

So you're telling me that your Prism townread is based on Enchant being town, but you're sure enough about Enchant scum to want to kill him... so how does the Prism read make sense again?

It doesn't!

I am willing to vote prism

Can already tell I'm going to be a liar who gets their house burned down, sorry.

Can tl;dr that I will have questions for Datisi later but was satisfied with his last response. At the risk of reinforcing the "chaining" can of worms, I am willing to wait. I'm willing to vote a wide variety of slots atm. I will say the "minor point" was that I didn't want to be pedantic and debate why I didn't like a single post for years.

Do you ever have a thought and then it's based on some preexisting logic, but then that pre-existing logic changes and then you forget to update the prior conclusion. Yea