Mafiascum.net

In post 8000, Milobird wrote:8000!

Please just hammer Pooky for the love of god. I just want to win another game as town and stop spending so much of my time on this.

-Bell

In post 7999, Milobird wrote:

In post 7998, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:

In post 7996, Milobird wrote:Also, can we please note that you've moved the goal posts. That's cheating.

-Bell

shut the fuck up wolf

Town Pooky everyone.

-Bell

In post 7923, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:This is my full reply to the "mechcase" in which Notty claims it is suboptimal for them to double-tap TIL because they already used Perish Song on Her.



(1) The missed nightkill did not actually do anything to affect the game state - we ended up on evens and had to no-elim anyway to get back on odds.

(2) Drawing out the roleblocker early with a fake guilty is pretty useful when your team is low on players. A hidden roleblocker versus a solo scum is like equivalent to a cop in power level as every successful kill creates a "cleared" player who did not make the kill. The POE was already tight for you so you need to draw the roleblocker out as your team is in danger of being yeeted.

(3) There is also the added benefit of creating a fake guilty that can be pushed, perhaps saving Imaginality for another day. If the fake guilty had landed on somebody else, I think they probably just die that day and Imaginality escapes death on D3.

(4) If you actually win this game on this fake guilty, then the missed kill will have been well worth it.

These are all fairly important strategic benefits for there to be a missing kill on Night Three. It's actually quite possible you decided just to no kill on that night rather than shoot TIL.

I don't know what you did because I'm not mafia. You are, you have the benefit of knowing what went on. I do not.

You continue to claim it is suboptimal play to shoot TIL on N3, except as I've outlined above - there are significant advantages to a no-kill on that night. So much so that I think maybe you could've just no-killed intentionally.



Furthermore,

It's quite clear from when you put out this hitcase on me that you knew Dwlee was a delayed poisoner while I was under the impression he was a delayed nightkiller - meaning you are far more familiar with his role than me. Which makes sense because I'm not on his team and you are. I would know what Dwlee is if I was actually on a team with him.

Also if you actually believed in the validity of your case and think it's a slam dunk, you would not resort to flooding the thread with ate posts to drown out my defense against it. You would simply let the case rest on its own merits. Your very desperation shows that you don't actually believe in your mechcase. You simply repeat it over and over again.

Furthermore,

The game state you have been hyping all along. Which is that Pooky, Deepwolf Extraordinaire repped into this game, vigged his backup Godfather, and then tried to bus his actual Godfather, to go hyper deep wolf, directly contradicts your point about Pooky making the nightkill in the first place.

If the gameplan is for Scum!Pooky to vig his teammate for credit and then bus his other teammates, then there is literally no reason for Pooky to be committing the nightkill whatsoever.

At that point in the game I had not yet claimed to be a vig, I was certainly plausible as a block candidate. There is literally no reason for Deepwolf Pooky to make the nightkill. Losing your deepwolf to a tracker/blocker/watcher etc after you invest one dead scum to make him super strong makes basically 0 sense. Esp since Imaginality is not going to go deep since he was barely even playing the game at that point.

Lastly.

If you actually believed this pile of horseshit you call a case, you would've used it on Day 5, Day 6, Day 7, Day 8... You would not be waiting until the very last day of the game to pull it out of your ass and try to kill me with it. This is just cobbled together nonsense you have recycled from 6 game days ago because none of the other shit you were flinging at the wall was doing any good. SC moderately kind of thought this was plausible so you've decided to spam it over and over again hoping the more you type it the less it stinks.

The entire approach you have towards trying to case me today is just desperation spam attack in volume. Using shitlogic, AtE, random lies, and garbage. Your strategy is to bury this thread in so much filth and spam that nobody wants to read it and people just throw up their hands and give up because there's just so much shit being thrown.

In post 8000, Milobird wrote:Please just hammer Pooky for the love of god. I just want get out of bad scum jail and I've sunk 2 months of my life into this

In post 8005, Milobird wrote:Look Pooky.
I don't care about what rules you come up with in your head about how Mafia should be played.
I don't appreciate you calling my attempts to demonstrate that you're scum "garbage" nor do I appreciate your constant baiting.
Nor do I appreciate your fake rage that just toes the line.
Your dishonesty, while annoying because others don't seem to acknowledge it, is fine because well, you're scum.
Your honesty disgusted as scum dishonesty in order to post a manifesto about the etiquette of mafia games however, I don't enjoy or care for.

If you want to talk about this, we can do it out of the game inside of in your safe space.

-Bell


-Bell

In post 8011, Milobird wrote:Most of the worst arguments I've seen in this game have been in terms of false equivalence between my garbage content and your total lack of any content whatsoever. Your argument for Mastina and your argument that you're currently making.

So I guess, I'm grateful that you keep repeating it.

-Bell

In post 8013, Milobird wrote:How is "Mastina would've changed her mind" a good argument.

In post 8013, Milobird wrote:How is: "Well it worked, didn't it!?" a good argument.

In post 6775, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:

In post 6772, Milobird wrote:Yes, you could've said that to Mastina and I'm sure she would have been like "yes, that makes sense you're right Pooky"
and then she voted us and won the game for town and there was a fairy and a unicorn in there somewhere too.

I wouldn't say it's certain she would change her mind

I think there is a significant chance she would

That's why you decided to make the kill on her rather than Sir Cakes

You keep claiming there is no way Mastina would ever change her mind if you killed Sir Cakes

Yet you expect Sir Cakes to change his mind now that Mastina is dead.

This is a contradiction in your argument.

In post 8018, Milobird wrote:You actually have more posts than I do and far less solve.
But don't let the facts get in your way Pooky!

-Bell

In post 8021, Milobird wrote:..................
Oh, I'm sorry. there was a significant chance that Mastina would chance her mind and that there was a significant chance that Sircakez would change their mind.

My bad.

-Bell