Mafiascum.net

In post 8022, Milobird wrote:Do you not know what hydras are

-Bell

In post 7923, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:This is my full reply to the "mechcase" in which Notty claims it is suboptimal for them to double-tap TIL because they already used Perish Song on Her.



(1) The missed nightkill did not actually do anything to affect the game state - we ended up on evens and had to no-elim anyway to get back on odds.

(2) Drawing out the roleblocker early with a fake guilty is pretty useful when your team is low on players. A hidden roleblocker versus a solo scum is like equivalent to a cop in power level as every successful kill creates a "cleared" player who did not make the kill. The POE was already tight for you so you need to draw the roleblocker out as your team is in danger of being yeeted.

(3) There is also the added benefit of creating a fake guilty that can be pushed, perhaps saving Imaginality for another day. If the fake guilty had landed on somebody else, I think they probably just die that day and Imaginality escapes death on D3.

(4) If you actually win this game on this fake guilty, then the missed kill will have been well worth it.

These are all fairly important strategic benefits for there to be a missing kill on Night Three. It's actually quite possible you decided just to no kill on that night rather than shoot TIL.

I don't know what you did because I'm not mafia. You are, you have the benefit of knowing what went on. I do not.

You continue to claim it is suboptimal play to shoot TIL on N3, except as I've outlined above - there are significant advantages to a no-kill on that night. So much so that I think maybe you could've just no-killed intentionally.



Furthermore,

It's quite clear from when you put out this hitcase on me that you knew Dwlee was a delayed poisoner while I was under the impression he was a delayed nightkiller - meaning you are far more familiar with his role than me. Which makes sense because I'm not on his team and you are. I would know what Dwlee is if I was actually on a team with him.

Also if you actually believed in the validity of your case and think it's a slam dunk, you would not resort to flooding the thread with ate posts to drown out my defense against it. You would simply let the case rest on its own merits. Your very desperation shows that you don't actually believe in your mechcase. You simply repeat it over and over again.

Furthermore,

The game state you have been hyping all along. Which is that Pooky, Deepwolf Extraordinaire repped into this game, vigged his backup Godfather, and then tried to bus his actual Godfather, to go hyper deep wolf, directly contradicts your point about Pooky making the nightkill in the first place.

If the gameplan is for Scum!Pooky to vig his teammate for credit and then bus his other teammates, then there is literally no reason for Pooky to be committing the nightkill whatsoever.

At that point in the game I had not yet claimed to be a vig, I was certainly plausible as a block candidate. There is literally no reason for Deepwolf Pooky to make the nightkill. Losing your deepwolf to a tracker/blocker/watcher etc after you invest one dead scum to make him super strong makes basically 0 sense. Esp since Imaginality is not going to go deep since he was barely even playing the game at that point.

Lastly.

If you actually believed this pile of horseshit you call a case, you would've used it on Day 5, Day 6, Day 7, Day 8... You would not be waiting until the very last day of the game to pull it out of your ass and try to kill me with it. This is just cobbled together nonsense you have recycled from 6 game days ago because none of the other shit you were flinging at the wall was doing any good. SC moderately kind of thought this was plausible so you've decided to spam it over and over again hoping the more you type it the less it stinks.

The entire approach you have towards trying to case me today is just desperation spam attack in volume. Using shitlogic, AtE, random lies, and garbage. Your strategy is to bury this thread in so much filth and spam that nobody wants to read it and people just throw up their hands and give up because there's just so much shit being thrown.

In post 7979, Milobird wrote:

In post 7958, Milobird wrote:1. "Alls well that ends well"
2. No, just no. That doesn't make any sense to me, but maybe I'm just terrible at mechanics. Sircakez would be better at this. But I dunno why we would bother when we already have similar role in Gamma to shoot.
3. Alls well that ends well part deux. With soft benefits being weighed equally with hard benefits. Which yeah. I just don't deal in soft benefits.
4. All well that ends well part TREUX. Oh my god. WHy. Just why are you making this terrible argument Pooky. Like it's absurd on its face.

Just because things worked out that way does not in anyway mean scum planned it. Like, you just look bad based on the available evidence. Because you're scum and SCUM LOOK BAD WHEN THEY GET ROLE BLOCKED AND THERE ARE NO ALTERNATIVE EXPLANATIONS THAT MAKE SENSE.

I have refuted your nonsense. How's it feel?

-Bell

In post 7961, Milobird wrote:Also in regards to pretending you don't know how your partner's role works. I can think of one reason you might pretend not to know how your partner's role works!
It's a pretty good one.

-Bell

In post 7968, Milobird wrote:Like, go on Pooky.
Explain how this isn't a failure to apply Okham's razor.
Explain how it isn't the case that you're saying, "It worked out for you didn't it? *Smirk* Look at how bad I look, JUST AS YOU INTENDED YOU CLEVER SCALLYWAG"

Read your own words. Your argument is as silly as the argument you made for us nking Mastina.

-Bell

In post 8028, Titus wrote:VOTE: Pooky

In post 8026, Milobird wrote:Jesus christ Bear.
You're not Petapan.
Stop pretending to be.

-Bell

In post 8031, Milobird wrote:

In post 8028, Titus wrote:VOTE: Pooky

Fucking thank you.

-Bell

In post 8034, Milobird wrote:I know you're dead and that your vote doesn't matter, but if you did have that vote.
Yes, we would've won.
Actually I think it would've taken 3 votes to elim someone, but I keep forgetting if it were 2 or 3 votes needed when there's 4 people.

-Bell

In post 8032, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:

In post 8026, Milobird wrote:Jesus christ Bear.
You're not Petapan.
Stop pretending to be.

-Bell

FUNNY BECAUSE YOUVE SPENT ALL OF THE DAY TRYING TO PRETEND I WANT TO BE PETA FUCKING PAN

DO I LOOK LIKE IM FUCKING ENJOYING MYSELF!?!?!

I DO NOT FUCKING WANT TO RESPOND TO YOUR SHITTY SPAM ATTACKS

I WOULD RATHER I POST AND THEN YOU POST AND THE SC ASKS US QUESTIONS AND THEN MAKES A DECISION

INSTEAD I HAVE TO DEAL WITH YOUR UTTER FUCKING TRASH FOR A WHOLE WEEK

I DONT EVEN GET PAID FOR THIS

IF I DIDNT RESPECT THE REST OF THIS TOWN I WOULDVE FUCKING SELF VOTED ALREADY AND TOLD YOU TO CHOKE ON THIS SCUM WIN

In post 8038, Milobird wrote:Yeah, Petapan doesn't look like they enjoy their scum games either.

-Bell

In post 8033, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:

In post 8031, Milobird wrote:

In post 8028, Titus wrote:VOTE: Pooky

Fucking thank you.

-Bell

are you really going to pretend she's got a vote

rofl how desperate are you

In post 8034, Milobird wrote:I know you're dead and that your vote doesn't matter, but if you did have that vote.
Yes, we would've won.
Actually I think it would've taken 3 votes to elim someone, but I keep forgetting if it were 2 or 3 votes needed when there's 4 people.

-Bell

In post 8041, Milobird wrote:Woops, those two quotes were pointing out I was in no way trying to pretend that fake hammer was real.
I mean, we've both been around the block.

Unless you think I typed out that post in less than 40 seconds. Which cool I guess. after reading Pooky's response which would be even cooler.
I guess. But not really possible so alas. Pooky couldn't quite fit that opportunistic push into time frame and so he showed himself to be wrong instead. Which is not actually a scum tell which is unfortunate.

-Bell

In post 8044, Milobird wrote:Titus, may I ask who you are endorsing the lim of as of this time.

-Bell

In post 8047, SirCakez wrote:You guys are making me just want to vote whoever is the most toxic spammer

In post 8048, SirCakez wrote:Frankly I don't feel any more posts can significantly change my mind here
Just a matter of deciding