Page 323 of 622

Posted: Mon Jul 18, 2022 4:51 pm
by Rad
In post 8044, T-Bone wrote:The simpler explanation would be no hood if that's your theory Rad. Which I don't think is unreasonable.
Yeah perhaps. I'd love to see when that neighborhood was revealed compared to other neighborhoods. If someone just knows off hand, that might be something interesting to consider. I mean, if it was the first one revealed, it's a lot more likely that it's legit ya know? But I can't remember the order neighborhoods were revealed and there's 322 pages...

Posted: Mon Jul 18, 2022 4:52 pm
by T-Bone
I think you're town Math sheesh.

Posted: Mon Jul 18, 2022 4:53 pm
by T-Bone
In post 8049, Bell wrote:Was the posting any better in the hood or was it all just...whatever their posts are this game in main thread?
I may never get over some of their posts this game. They seem potentially informed/sarcastic.
I don't know if I can quantify better. I think he has posted in generally the same tone in both our hood and the thread.

Posted: Mon Jul 18, 2022 4:53 pm
by MathBlade
In post 8049, Bell wrote:Was the posting any better in the hood or was it all just...whatever their posts are this game in main thread?
I may never get over some of their posts this game. They seem potentially informed/sarcastic.
C&G’s posting is good? I don’t follow

Posted: Mon Jul 18, 2022 4:53 pm
by Bell
....Why is that ridiculous MB?

Posted: Mon Jul 18, 2022 4:54 pm
by MathBlade
In post 8054, Bell wrote:....Why is that ridiculous MB?
Pronoun found. Define “that” please

Lots of ridiculous things have been suggested

Posted: Mon Jul 18, 2022 4:55 pm
by Bell
Why is ridiculous for scum to fake claim being in a neighborhood with another scum in a game in which nobody's roles flip on death?

Posted: Mon Jul 18, 2022 4:56 pm
by T-Bone
I guess I can say I found Johnny helpful to me in our Hood if that helps?

Posted: Mon Jul 18, 2022 4:56 pm
by Rad
In post 8043, Lukewarm wrote:Does anyone think that there is still a benefit for me to keep my neighbor unmentioned?
I don't see why not, but I'm not theory master.

Why not discuss with your neighbor and come to an agreement?

Posted: Mon Jul 18, 2022 4:57 pm
by Cat Scratch Fever
In post 8039, MathBlade wrote:@CSF will respond to that tomorrow

But it’s more Corwin wasn’t active which was already established.

So ?
Spoiler:
In post 3556, MathBlade wrote:
In post 3302, Klick wrote:I don't really think Corwin's body of work looks like scumhunting, it looks more like projecting reads into the thread to look like he's scumhunting
Hey something approaching a reason.

Can you elaborate?

Dude was posting for two people.

Some of it is Ircher/RH9 and some is him.

So yes by fucking definition Corwin was. Congrats!
I don't think this is much of a rebuttal
In post 3601, MathBlade wrote:
In post 3599, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:
In post 3597, MathBlade wrote:
In post 3595, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:
In post 3593, MathBlade wrote:
In post 3591, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:like 80% of the read has nothing to do with you

I was always going to scumread whoever rep'd into the slot unless they towntold extremely hard cuz Corwin was scummy af
Then you should be able to explain that read

But you haven’t.
uh yea i have

i linked the iso

town!corwin is like a bull in a china shop

he was barely present this game
Again already explained that

Having to play for two people is hard AF

Next
bruh he wasn't even playing for one person
Factually incorrect
Saying this is "factually incorrect" is just unhelpful tbh

Posted: Mon Jul 18, 2022 4:58 pm
by MathBlade
In post 8056, Bell wrote:Why is ridiculous for scum to fake claim being in a neighborhood with another scum in a game in which nobody's roles flip on death?
Because roles are unknown.

Frogster could out a claim

Certain neighborhood invests would out it

Like there’s smart fake claims and dumb ones.

If lying about flavor to boost the claim and a flavor cop exists there’s another

When I play scum I am known for my brilliant uncountered fake claims.

This would be bad and I would never agree

Posted: Mon Jul 18, 2022 4:58 pm
by Bell
I genuinely can't imagine town shooting Dunnstral. At least not without game throwing accusations being sent their way for shooting a heavily implied FN.
Frog makes sense from an emotional perspective from Pooky's exhortations. I have a bad feeling Frogster's role was important to the game tho. :(

Oh well. I would have called for Frog blood if they were alive anyway just to appease the bear, so I can't complain too much. Though I heavily preferred an MB shot and the vig ignored my scum day plea which is just typical.

Posted: Mon Jul 18, 2022 5:00 pm
by T-Bone
Okay those quotes together CSF posted don't look great.

Posted: Mon Jul 18, 2022 5:00 pm
by MathBlade
In post 8059, Cat Scratch Fever wrote:
In post 8039, MathBlade wrote:@CSF will respond to that tomorrow

But it’s more Corwin wasn’t active which was already established.

So ?
Spoiler:
In post 3556, MathBlade wrote:
In post 3302, Klick wrote:I don't really think Corwin's body of work looks like scumhunting, it looks more like projecting reads into the thread to look like he's scumhunting
Hey something approaching a reason.

Can you elaborate?

Dude was posting for two people.

Some of it is Ircher/RH9 and some is him.

So yes by fucking definition Corwin was. Congrats!
I don't think this is much of a rebuttal
In post 3601, MathBlade wrote:
In post 3599, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:
In post 3597, MathBlade wrote:
In post 3595, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:
In post 3593, MathBlade wrote:
In post 3591, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:like 80% of the read has nothing to do with you

I was always going to scumread whoever rep'd into the slot unless they towntold extremely hard cuz Corwin was scummy af
Then you should be able to explain that read

But you haven’t.
uh yea i have

i linked the iso

town!corwin is like a bull in a china shop

he was barely present this game
Again already explained that

Having to play for two people is hard AF

Next
bruh he wasn't even playing for one person
Factually incorrect
Saying this is "factually incorrect" is just unhelpful tbh
But it is factually incorrect

The case relies on faulty assumptions

And as previously established RL

Like it’s just dude wasn’t posting rewritten in a different way

Posted: Mon Jul 18, 2022 5:01 pm
by Bell
I am known for my brilliant tennis back hand swing and uppercut.

Posted: Mon Jul 18, 2022 5:01 pm
by MathBlade
In post 8062, T-Bone wrote:Okay those quotes together CSF posted don't look great.
Why?

It’s just the same repeated Corwin wasn’t active

This is just the same repeated recycled bullshit to avoid talking BBT

Posted: Mon Jul 18, 2022 5:03 pm
by T-Bone
In post 8065, MathBlade wrote:
In post 8062, T-Bone wrote:Okay those quotes together CSF posted don't look great.
Why?

It’s just the same repeated Corwin wasn’t active

This is just the same repeated recycled bullshit to avoid talking BBT
Because what you said isn't consistent.

Posted: Mon Jul 18, 2022 5:03 pm
by MathBlade
Wake me up when you want to scumhunt or provide actual reasons for scumreading me

Posted: Mon Jul 18, 2022 5:04 pm
by MathBlade
In post 8066, T-Bone wrote:
In post 8065, MathBlade wrote:
In post 8062, T-Bone wrote:Okay those quotes together CSF posted don't look great.
Why?

It’s just the same repeated Corwin wasn’t active

This is just the same repeated recycled bullshit to avoid talking BBT
Because what you said isn't consistent.
But it is?

Posted: Mon Jul 18, 2022 5:06 pm
by T-Bone
Okay how can you say that "of course Corwin looks like he's posting for two people because he is" and then now say "it's established Corwin wasn't active". That's a problem for me because you said he wasn't active and yet you also said he was making an active effort to support DNA?

Posted: Mon Jul 18, 2022 5:08 pm
by T-Bone
Also tbh, your lack of concern that your Hood partner, who in theory is not confirmed to you, broke his post restriction also concerns me!

I'll leave it there though for now.

Posted: Mon Jul 18, 2022 5:09 pm
by MathBlade
In post 8069, T-Bone wrote:Okay how can you say that "of course Corwin looks like he's posting for two people because he is" and then now say "it's established Corwin wasn't active". That's a problem for me because you said he wasn't active and yet you also said he was making an active effort to support DNA?
I think you fail to understand

Corwin had RL and had to post for two people and trying to figure out his own reads.

Sort of like when I opened and hard pushed Bell when I first came in. That was mostly DNA and I saw a post and thought I could see it and pushed

Posted: Mon Jul 18, 2022 5:11 pm
by MathBlade
In post 8070, T-Bone wrote:Also tbh, your lack of concern that your Hood partner, who in theory is not confirmed to you, broke his post restriction also concerns me!

I'll leave it there though for now.
I have a rule about worry:

If it’s within your control fix it and don’t worry
If it’s not within your control then there is no use in worrying
If it’s possibly within your control and unsure worry and try

The past isn’t within my control.

Posted: Mon Jul 18, 2022 5:14 pm
by MathBlade
Like I will be anxious as fuck but I then focus on other things but devoting worry is something I won’t do

Posted: Mon Jul 18, 2022 5:16 pm
by ProfessorDrapion
In post 7943, Taly wrote:i shouldve been in bed 30 minutes ago so im not doing a huge post here

needless to say, my reads have been wrong at every point so far, so im confident that im being misted somewhere.

it's very likely scum were on both sides of the gladiate, and i wonder if
ceph
was the elimination due to having better reads outside of his push onto me.

rad/pooky/dp/csf/luke
are townreads, many others are leans, majority in the PoE.

>
Johnny
I haven't heard a thing from you during the gladiate other than me being town, I'm going to need some convincing to believe that read at the moment.
>
Math
, why did you spend a whole back-and-forth trying to gauge for justification to vote
ceph
and then pivot back to me when
Luke
gave reasoning?
>
RCE
you were very similar in the regard of changing votes off little provocation, I want you to justify your votes.
>
Gamma
, remind me why you chose to push
Bell
!scum when it wasn't an opportunity? What happened to that read in light of
Enchant
!scum?
>
Pooky
, what is your read on
T-Bone
?
>
Drap
, walk me through that wolf PoE.
>
Bella
, I don't remember a thing from your posts, what are your reads?
>
Roden/Dwlee
, have you guys had the chance to interact with each other much?
>
Titus
, are you feeling better? How would you read the VCA of
Taly V Ceph
? I'm also failing to see the connection of
BBT
-scum, but my brain is tired at the moment.
>
T-Bone
, why do a gloat post when 3 town are dead?
>
Mislim Bait
, where are you at with the catch-up? Do you need any help in following this hell of a game thread?

VOTE: Mathblade

vote's best served here,
frogs
was my other strongest scumread.
luke
sharing that feels like a genuine mindmeld. this makes the most sense.

Yeah I was the person who pushed on Frog to hardest and really thought Cephrir was trying to save them.

I also pushed to save you and it succeed, I think your town based on what I have seen from you so far so you better be town lol.