Page 34 of 51

Posted: Fri Aug 10, 2012 3:55 pm
by Shamrock
More DeasVail votes please.

IceGuy, MattP, thoughts on DV? I think you two are the only ones who haven't weighed in.

I really would prefer a DV lynch but if we reeeeally don't have the votes we could always revert to the DCL wagon which is a decent lynch and which we clearly do have the votes for (shamrock jarvis mattp iceguy chaos michel)

@Jarvis: As I said, I didn't have time that day to read/post in both games. I needed to catch up in the other one since I hadn't made any substantive posts there yet.

pedit: "The speed of his [DV's] wagon"? The wagon that hasn't broken 4 people yet?

Posted: Fri Aug 10, 2012 3:56 pm
by Shamrock
Also, "doesn't seem to be much reason behind it," are you even reading the thread wtf

Posted: Fri Aug 10, 2012 4:22 pm
by Jarvis
lol those reads are so contrived

Posted: Fri Aug 10, 2012 4:56 pm
by DCLXVI
Jarvis wrote:lol those reads are so contrived


Why do you think they are contrived?

Posted: Fri Aug 10, 2012 5:01 pm
by DCLXVI
Shamrock wrote:And yes, DV is L-1 now.

Shamrock wrote:pedit: "The speed of his [DV's] wagon"? The wagon that hasn't broken 4 people yet?

Posted: Fri Aug 10, 2012 5:02 pm
by DCLXVI
Yeah, shamrock is a good wagon, flip flopping on his reasoning just to take a cheap dig at me.

Posted: Fri Aug 10, 2012 5:04 pm
by Shamrock
I miscounted the number of votes on DV, then the mod posted a votecount and so I used the correct number, that is your idea of a "flip flop"?? ROFL WHAT

Posted: Fri Aug 10, 2012 5:07 pm
by DCLXVI
Well, I'm sorry that I believed your first post, but my point is that you shouldn't be going after me for YOUR mistake.

Posted: Fri Aug 10, 2012 5:16 pm
by Shamrock
There is a vote count literally two posts above your "reads", but even if there wasn't, the fact that you're referring to my correcting a counting error as "flip flopping on [my] reasoning" is hilarious.

Posted: Fri Aug 10, 2012 5:42 pm
by DCLXVI
I'll make my point more clear than.

You were mistaken about the vote count.
Yet you bash me for being mistaken about how big the wagon got.

Hypocrisy 101 right here.

Posted: Fri Aug 10, 2012 6:24 pm
by DeasVail
DCLXVI wrote:I'll make my point more clear than.

You were mistaken about the vote count.
Yet you bash me for being mistaken about how big the wagon got.

Hypocrisy 101 right here.

Is that scummy?

Posted: Fri Aug 10, 2012 6:26 pm
by Bitmap
DeasVail wrote:
DCLXVI wrote:I'll make my point more clear than.

You were mistaken about the vote count.
Yet you bash me for being mistaken about how big the wagon got.

Hypocrisy 101 right here.

Is that scummy?

Probably not. It could even be a slight town tell because scum would want to make sure their vote counts are right and measure everything carefully.

Posted: Fri Aug 10, 2012 9:30 pm
by IceGuy
Shamrock wrote:
IceGuy, MattP, thoughts on DV? I think you two are the only ones who haven't weighed in.


I think I already have, somewhere a few pages back. I think he's town and that hasn't changed.

Posted: Sat Aug 11, 2012 1:51 am
by Shamrock
@DCL: I was just correcting your incorrect assertion that the DV wagon had grown quickly. You are the one who decided to turn this into an accusation of "flip flopping", presumably to distract from the fact that you have no other argument for DV being town.

@IceGuy: Why? I could have missed it but I skimmed the bottom of your ISO and didn't see it anywhere.

Posted: Sat Aug 11, 2012 1:57 am
by IceGuy
Shamrock wrote:
@IceGuy: Why? I could have missed it but I skimmed the bottom of your ISO and didn't see it anywhere.


You're right, I didn't, confused him with Michel.

Posted: Sat Aug 11, 2012 8:56 am
by Jarvis
IceGuy, are you deliberately avoiding giving an opinion?

Bitmap, you've done barely anything recently, and now you pop in to answer a question directed at another player. Are you taking the piss?

DCLXVI, your reads are contrived because they're really obviously crafted to fit around those you've been calling scum. You act like its PoE, but it's no coincidence. Your reasoning for your townread on DV is really bad, and has been shown to be so. Likewise for your null reads on myself and Michel

The best part is how you claim to have the scum by PoE, but have two null reads right above them. It's almost as if those are
confident null reads
. Like as in you're confident they're not scum. Otherwise you wouldn't be able to eliminate them as you infer. But you don't have them as town.

THAT is why they're contrived as fuck.

In fact, that's basically a confession as far as I'm concerned. DV can wait.

VOTE: DCLXVI

This is 100% going through this time.

Posted: Sat Aug 11, 2012 9:02 am
by Staeg
Seeing as deadline's in 3 days
unvote
Vote: 666

Posted: Sat Aug 11, 2012 9:08 am
by DCLXVI
Jarvis wrote:DCLXVI, your reads are contrived because they're really obviously crafted to fit around those you've been calling scum. You act like its PoE, but it's no coincidence. Your reasoning for your townread on DV is really bad, and has been shown to be so. Likewise for your null reads on myself and Michel


So my reads are bad because their consistant with whom I've been calling town and scum. and that is a bad thing?

Posted: Sat Aug 11, 2012 9:09 am
by DCLXVI
and you sheep him onto that staeg...

Posted: Sat Aug 11, 2012 9:11 am
by DCLXVI
But seriously Jarvis, I give reads which are consistent with what I have been saying, and then you like OMG you must be scum.

I bet if I had given reads that weren't consistent with what I had said earlier you would have also called me scum for that.

Posted: Sat Aug 11, 2012 9:14 am
by Staeg
DCLXVI wrote:and you sheep him onto that staeg...

No, Jarvis has generally had bad reasoning for everything this game - it's just that I find you to be a good lynch on the overall scale of things.

Posted: Sat Aug 11, 2012 9:14 am
by Nexus
ChaosOmega is being prodded.

Posted: Sat Aug 11, 2012 9:18 am
by Staeg
Staeg wrote:
DCLXVI wrote:and you sheep him onto that staeg...

No, Jarvis has generally had bad reasoning for everything this game - it's just that I find you to be a good lynch on the overall scale of things.

Okay, well, "everything" is a bid of an overstatement, but still.

Posted: Sat Aug 11, 2012 9:26 am
by Bitmap
UNVOTE:

Posted: Sat Aug 11, 2012 9:31 am
by Shamrock
Yeah after that exchange I'm even more on board than I was before, let's do this.

UNVOTE: DeasVail
VOTE: DCLXVI