Page 34 of 72

Posted: Tue Nov 12, 2013 9:18 am
by Marquis
but mario's voting me now and ahhhhhhhhhhhhhh i really want to vote him again because it's so shitty...... ahhhhh

Posted: Tue Nov 12, 2013 9:19 am
by Sakura Hana
In post 824, Marquis wrote:hi there i could have easily jumped on the mario wagon as an easy and the biggest alternative to mine but i didn't because i'm town ok bye
What's the reason behind this statement?

Posted: Tue Nov 12, 2013 9:22 am
by Marquis
whenever i'm town i just look for my name and when i'm scum i look for no-risk wagons so idk what boro is talking about there

mara you're grasping at straws and i hate you now

nah jk ilu kinda but idk your alignment even more than i idk'ed it earlier

pedit sakura i am in class and figured it was a good time to prod dodge but then i started reading things and wow babbling is fun

Posted: Tue Nov 12, 2013 9:33 am
by Sakura Hana
In post 827, Marquis wrote:sakura i am in class and figured it was a good time to prod dodge but
then i started reading things and wow babbling is fun
That doesn't answer the question. In fact, it shows that you do have a reason because of the bolded.

Posted: Tue Nov 12, 2013 9:53 am
by Marquis
the statement you quoted was something i thought of while reading the boro-neo back and forth and i was like "hey i should say that... it'll make me look town or something!!"

if you really want me to give a reason for the bolded it was because real life was more boring than posting for once

Posted: Tue Nov 12, 2013 10:13 am
by Sakura Hana
In post 829, Marquis wrote:i was like "hey i should say that... it'll make me look town or something!!"
Why is looking town more important than finding scum?

Posted: Tue Nov 12, 2013 10:37 am
by Marquis
considering how a few people were all like "yeah that read doesn't matter cuz we're lynching marquis anyway today" i found it concerning

Posted: Tue Nov 12, 2013 11:38 am
by BoroPhil
yeah dry probably needs to explain that one.

a lot of people are making noise in this thread without actually backing up their actions. noise and no action is a bad combination.

Posted: Tue Nov 12, 2013 11:42 am
by Neonizer
Seriously phil saying someone is the scummiest isn't a reason. Give me a reason for why you thought I was scummiest. You call me lazy but you are just fluff and no content.

That's not attaching. You are so blatantly going for me with no real reasoning that it's coming across as bussing. So that if you flip scum your buddies get a mislynch of me through your attachment to me

Posted: Tue Nov 12, 2013 1:14 pm
by Ms Marangal
In post 805, startfromtheheart wrote:
In post 788, Ms Marangal wrote:
In post 732, Marquis wrote:Mara if you're town you should be able to read the meta here and if you're scum then here's your chance to bus for towncred.
this is shitty, and a really weird appeal

VOTE: Marquis
Con Mafia Marquis who you townread correctly and won a sigbet through (NACHO WAS THE LOSER HA *don't tell him I said that and look at his avatar ;)*) vs. Open 534 Marquis

Discuss!
Wrong bet!

we avi-betted on the alignments of Rach/Marquis

the sigbet was on him being town

link to 534?

Posted: Tue Nov 12, 2013 1:26 pm
by Marquis

Posted: Tue Nov 12, 2013 1:28 pm
by Ms Marangal
In post 791, Nachomamma8 wrote:
Sure.
In post 789, Ms Marangal wrote:if Notsci is scum, I can't see these sequences of posts coming from scum

I can't really see them coming from scum, even if notsci was town

this reeks of genuine confusion
He's probably genuinely confused, yeah. I don't see why that makes him town.
I can't see him being open about his confusion on why Notsci wasn't lynch as scum.
if he was scum and NS was scum, and he believed in Plurality, he probably would have bussed since his partner is going down anyway. If they were scum together, I can't see him doing this kind of thing.

if he was scum, with Notsci town, I think he would be a little bit more cautious on expressing confusion to why town wasn't lynched even if he does believe in plurality
In post 793, Marcrell wrote:
In post 789, Ms Marangal wrote:
In post 762, Mario4 wrote:Can someone explain to me why nobody was lynched? I am really confused
In post 764, Mario4 wrote:i still don't get it, why wouldnt notscience have been lynched since he has the most votes on him?
In post 767, Mario4 wrote:I don't get why thats the rules. Every time i have played this game you don't need a majority you just need one guy with the most votes. but whatever I guess it technically helps us out.
if Notsci is scum, I can't see these sequences of posts coming from scum

I can't really see them coming from scum, even if notsci was town

this reeks of genuine confusion
They can look that way. Someone who was hopelessly confused early on in my last game turned out to be scum flying under the radar the whole time. It could go both ways as being confused happens regardless of alignment.
Hmm...

link?

Pedit: thanks marquis

Posted: Tue Nov 12, 2013 1:29 pm
by Ms Marangal
OH 534 IS THIS GAME

HERPADERP

Posted: Tue Nov 12, 2013 1:32 pm
by Ms Marangal
The appeal is still weird though

I mean, you're trying to work with me, but kinda think I am scum but at the same time, Boxing what I "should" be doing, and how I "should" act, and what I "should" know and making those expectations beyond what is reality?

what Kind of Meta should I be seeing? I'm not exactly the expert in reading you.

Posted: Tue Nov 12, 2013 1:38 pm
by Marquis
I like you as a person so maybe I'm just really reluctant to scumread you

And by should I meant follow my vote because it was the best option

Speaking of which

VOTE: notscience

Posted: Tue Nov 12, 2013 1:53 pm
by Ms Marangal
WHY

Posted: Tue Nov 12, 2013 1:54 pm
by Ms Marangal
and don't ignore my question

Posted: Tue Nov 12, 2013 2:01 pm
by notscience
To whoever asked me-

It's a mixture of feeling like a total asshole towards ETL and not wanting to turn this game into another 1436 (where I hardtunnel town and basically fuck the whole game over).

I'm voting for Mario because that's who Nacho is voting.

Posted: Tue Nov 12, 2013 2:54 pm
by Dry-fit
In post 831, Marquis wrote:considering how a few people were all like "yeah that read doesn't matter cuz we're lynching marquis anyway today" i found it concerning
In post 832, BoroPhil wrote:yeah dry probably needs to explain that one.

a lot of people are making noise in this thread without actually backing up their actions. noise and no action is a bad combination.
That's my feeling about the state of the town right now. I think Marquis will end up getting lynched. I've expressed suspicion of him the whole game so I don't know what you want me to explain.

Here's a bonus though:
Marquis wrote:what
the
fuck
This feels very fake.

Posted: Tue Nov 12, 2013 3:04 pm
by Marquis
oh thanks for your feels

Posted: Tue Nov 12, 2013 5:06 pm
by Marcrell
Link is here: http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=31040
As for scum hunting I was thinking I was going to do it today but I was super busy and didn't get to. Hopefully tomorrow. And Marquis looks suspicious to me hit since there was a wagon on him yesterday this probàbly looks rather bandwagony. Actual information tomorrow(hopefully).

Posted: Tue Nov 12, 2013 8:38 pm
by BoroPhil
In post 833, Neonizer wrote:Seriously phil saying someone is the scummiest isn't a reason. Give me a reason for why you thought I was scummiest. You call me lazy but you are just fluff and no content.

That's not attaching. You are so blatantly going for me with no real reasoning that it's coming across as bussing. So that if you flip scum your buddies get a mislynch of me through your attachment to me
I've explained it enough now. I know you don't like it because you are scum but I'm not going round in circles with you. I'll leave it to the others to decide who is scummiest.

and I'll ask again:

what is this scum meta you think you have noticed
which of my scumbuddies were on this mario wagon

you talk about fluff, yet the irony is you are zero content yourself. it's all noise.

Posted: Tue Nov 12, 2013 8:40 pm
by BoroPhil
In post 843, Dry-fit wrote:
In post 831, Marquis wrote:considering how a few people were all like "yeah that read doesn't matter cuz we're lynching marquis anyway today" i found it concerning
In post 832, BoroPhil wrote:yeah dry probably needs to explain that one.

a lot of people are making noise in this thread without actually backing up their actions. noise and no action is a bad combination.
That's my feeling about the state of the town right now. I think Marquis will end up getting lynched. I've expressed suspicion of him the whole game so I don't know what you want me to explain.


Here's a bonus though:
Marquis wrote:what
the
fuck
This feels very fake.
my point was (and marquis's as well I think) was that you seemed to be saying I was a better lynch but you were resigned to lynching marquis. which seemed odd considering the time left.

Posted: Tue Nov 12, 2013 8:41 pm
by BoroPhil
and neo, what?

let me get this straight. I'm sacrificing myself so we can get a mislynch of you tomorrow? Do you realise how preposterous a defence that is?

Posted: Tue Nov 12, 2013 8:46 pm
by Neonizer
You've explained nothing. You're explanation is you think a scum is on that wagon and so you picked me but there's no substance to why.

I then have a theory that it must be because you're scum buddies are on the wagon. I have no substance to say which are those buddies so I won't pick a random one like you have here.

Who said you're sacrificing today? Just in this game you've attached it so when you get lynched. Could be today could be 3 days away