Page 34 of 89

Posted: Mon Dec 09, 2013 2:40 pm
by Kazekirimaru
Fuck it

VOTE: Rufflig

Give me a body to analyze.

Posted: Mon Dec 09, 2013 2:47 pm
by orcinus_theoriginal
In post 824, Tammy wrote:You know what's funny and what makes me feel like I'm even more right? This fake, let me dig up Tammy's partners. You're not inexperienced. You know that making partner analysis before a flip is bunk. You know that reading people off a read that could be completely incorrect is a horrible way of scumhunting, but yet you're doing it because you need a fake means of scumhunting.
meh it helps in situational cases

like at lylo or if you're playing with like mastin or someone who has a known method of interaction with scumbuddies

Posted: Mon Dec 09, 2013 4:04 pm
by The Rufflig
In post 819, TheFuzzylogic99 wrote:@ Ruff
Are you claiming that you are part of a third part mason or something bc that is what i am getting from your post
No, I'm not part of a mason group.

---
In post 824, Tammy wrote:You know what's bothering me? The "Tammy is known to occ soon ally..." Which is again you trying to act like you know anything about me when you don't.
I looked you up.

Posted: Mon Dec 09, 2013 4:09 pm
by Tammy
In post 827, The Rufflig wrote:
In post 819, TheFuzzylogic99 wrote:@ Ruff
Are you claiming that you are part of a third part mason or something bc that is what i am getting from your post
No, I'm not part of a mason group.

---
In post 824, Tammy wrote:You know what's bothering me? The "Tammy is known to occ soon ally..." Which is again you trying to act like you know anything about me when you don't.

I looked you up.
Cool. What games? What did you learn from them?

Posted: Mon Dec 09, 2013 4:10 pm
by Tammy
In post 826, orcinus_theoriginal wrote:
In post 824, Tammy wrote:You know what's funny and what makes me feel like I'm even more right? This fake, let me dig up Tammy's partners. You're not inexperienced. You know that making partner analysis before a flip is bunk. You know that reading people off a read that could be completely incorrect is a horrible way of scumhunting, but yet you're doing it because you need a fake means of scumhunting.
meh it helps in situational cases

like at lylo or if you're playing with like mastin or someone who has a known method of interaction with scumbuddies
Sometimes. Pointing out potential relational tells is a thing. Seeing how people read your scum read for future purposes in case you're right. But early day one? No, that's fake as hell.

Posted: Mon Dec 09, 2013 4:20 pm
by The Rufflig
GOD DAMN IT!!!

I need to talk to the mod.

I apologize to everyone for my utter stupidity in linking that quote.

Posted: Mon Dec 09, 2013 4:25 pm
by Cabd
Offending quote deleted; it was a link to an ongoing game.

Posted: Mon Dec 09, 2013 4:32 pm
by Tammy
Okay I've been super confused, but you should probably delete it from my post too.

Posted: Mon Dec 09, 2013 5:00 pm
by TheFuzzylogic99
Ruff is at L-1 so please place your intent to hammer before placing a vote on Ruff

@Ruff......
Your at the ropes end.... better makes your case why you are town and should not be lynched......

Posted: Mon Dec 09, 2013 5:09 pm
by Minami no Hana
Why isn't Rufflig dead yet?

Posted: Mon Dec 09, 2013 5:19 pm
by TheFuzzylogic99
Ok read through Ruff ISO and I have not seen anything scummy....... Please can somebody state the case against Ruff bc I am not seeing it.

@ tammy
You seem absouletly sure (well as sure as is possible in Mafia) that Ruff is scum


@ town
Supposing Ruff is lynched and flip scum.....would that clear Tammy in your opinion.

Posted: Mon Dec 09, 2013 9:02 pm
by Kazekirimaru
UNVOTE:

On second thought, there's still plenty of Day left, yeah?

Posted: Mon Dec 09, 2013 9:03 pm
by Kazekirimaru
In post 835, TheFuzzylogic99 wrote: @ town
Supposing Ruff is lynched and flip scum.....would that clear Tammy in your opinion.
Bussing is a thing.

Posted: Mon Dec 09, 2013 11:09 pm
by pitoli
Tammy is still town but I'm experiencing some cogdis with respect to Rufflig so I don't think I want to vote him yet.

VOTE: Nachomamma

Posted: Tue Dec 10, 2013 12:24 am
by Nachomamma8
In post 810, Kazekirimaru wrote:Why this vote? Why now?
Felt good. Wanted to back off Rufflig.

Posted: Tue Dec 10, 2013 12:25 am
by Nachomamma8
In post 811, Tammy wrote:
In post 767, orcinus_theoriginal wrote:Ok um

Dude :(

Not a scum meltdown UNVOTE:

Why wasn't it? I feel like I'm one of the more sensitive and temperamental players on this site and I can't understand that flip out.
The towniest meltdowns tend to be the ones that make the least sense.

Posted: Tue Dec 10, 2013 12:33 am
by Nachomamma8
In post 838, pitoli wrote:Tammy is still town but I'm experiencing some cogdis with respect to Rufflig so I don't think I want to vote him yet.

VOTE: Nachomamma
This was underwhelming.

Posted: Tue Dec 10, 2013 12:37 am
by pitoli
That's okay. I really just want to know why you voted me because I didn't feel any conviction behind it.

Posted: Tue Dec 10, 2013 12:38 am
by pitoli
Like I understand the reservations people have towards me and I even like Mac's push on me but you idk what is going on

Posted: Tue Dec 10, 2013 12:39 am
by orcinus_theoriginal
Hi nacho

Posted: Tue Dec 10, 2013 12:42 am
by Nachomamma8
In post 842, pitoli wrote:That's okay. I really just want to know why you voted me because I didn't feel any conviction behind it.
oh there isn't conviction behind it
why did you vote me instead of ask me why?

Posted: Tue Dec 10, 2013 12:42 am
by Nachomamma8
hi orc! how is reading the game going?

Posted: Tue Dec 10, 2013 12:42 am
by Nachomamma8
instead of ask me why i voted you :/

Posted: Tue Dec 10, 2013 12:44 am
by Nachomamma8
pitoli please don't make me wait that long i literally feel like my eyes are glazing over

Posted: Tue Dec 10, 2013 12:47 am
by pitoli
In post 845, Nachomamma8 wrote:
In post 842, pitoli wrote:That's okay. I really just want to know why you voted me because I didn't feel any conviction behind it.
oh there isn't conviction behind it
why did you vote me instead of ask me why?
Because omgus can get you places? "There isn't conviction behind it" is not really the explanation I was looking for, btw