Page 34 of 158

Posted: Fri Jan 31, 2014 12:47 pm
by borkjerfkin
Votecount 1.8


[5] mastin2 (Cephrir, pieguyn, Cabd, Metal Sonic, Varsoon)
[3] Cephrir (Angry Frat BROs, ActionDan, mastin2)
[2] Metal Sonic (Venmar, Kazekirimaru)
[2] Aegor (macmollie, Skullduggery)
[1] Brian Skies (Brian Skies)
[1] Flandre Scarlet (zMuffinMan)
[1] Kazekirimaru (Aegor)
[1] Skullduggery (orcinus_theoriginal)

[4] Not Voting (Kagami, Flandre Scarlet, MafiaSSK, sangres)

With 20 alive, it is 11 to lynch.

Let me know if you see any problems.

Deadline is in (expired on 2014-02-09 21:00:00)

Posted: Fri Jan 31, 2014 12:48 pm
by Varsoon
In post 825, borkjerfkin wrote:salad
THIS IS NOT BEEFY

Posted: Fri Jan 31, 2014 12:48 pm
by Kazekirimaru
Getting the entire playerlist to do anything within even a sizable time-window is going to be difficult.

Posted: Fri Jan 31, 2014 12:50 pm
by Varsoon
People who don't participate can be policy lynched or something.

It's half-cocked, but it could work.
Maybe I should try it in a smaller game setting.

Posted: Fri Jan 31, 2014 1:05 pm
by ActionDan
btw we won that game of LoL AP

Posted: Fri Jan 31, 2014 1:33 pm
by zMuffinMan
afb wrote:Oh right, zMuffin is still hillariously scum. Anyone want to quicklynch that?
he doesn't look like scum to me, and he's not _that_ hilarious

Posted: Fri Jan 31, 2014 1:36 pm
by macmollie
I AGREE WITH MUFFINA IN THAT HE IS NOT THAT HILARIOUS

Posted: Fri Jan 31, 2014 1:39 pm
by zMuffinMan
stop buddying me

Posted: Fri Jan 31, 2014 1:42 pm
by macmollie
<3

Posted: Fri Jan 31, 2014 2:36 pm
by Brian Skies
In post 363, Kazekirimaru wrote:But for what purpose would you join your own wagon? I don't get it. You're basically contributing to your own possible lynch.
I wanted to see what would happen and make people uncomfortable. Think about it this way: if every game starts the same way or in a similar fashion, then people can just imitate their usual reactions.

Also, I felt that MS/others were trolling me so I wanted to reciprocate.

If I had actually gotten speedlynched, I probably would have raged in the Dead QT and moved on.
In post 372, Skullduggery wrote:Including your own? Because if so, that would be a contradiction to what you said in 118, where you listed Scum as anyone on your wagon that you weren't familiar with (Flandre, Kagami, Metal Sonic, and Varsoon). Do you think your wagon was primarily Town-driven or Scum-driven? It can't be both, but that's what it sounds like you're saying.
I lack the confidence and awareness to say whether it was primarily town-driven or scum-driven, because quite frankly, I don't know. Personally, I would want that wagon to be scum-driven, except town can just as easily drive an early wagon up (and they do do this).

My early reads list was what I had at the time. I pulled out whatever players I thought could be town, commented on the two that I thought were weird, and placed all the others into the scum-pile out of spite. Town piling onto large wagons isn't something I considered until Bro brought it up later.
In post 374, Skullduggery wrote:I'm not sure what game you're referring to. Open 537?
Yes, actually. Apparently I had Desp and Varsoon mixed up.

Posted: Fri Jan 31, 2014 3:43 pm
by Brian Skies
Mostly Fluff

Spoiler:
In post 411, Kazekirimaru wrote:
In post 408, macmollie wrote:<3

then we won't have a problem
This and the entire preceding exchange makes me uneasy.
It's because you're missing context-specific information. Just be glad you're more blessed than me right now.
In post 415, ActionDan wrote:there isn't a problem lol
Lool. Not a problem regarding the moderator.

*The Pieguyn posting time was weird, but I don't think it has any merit.
In post 435, macmollie wrote:Imagegodly oneImage
Hahaha.

Never leave this site mollie.
In post 439, Aegor wrote:Mastin's posts are at best counterproductive.
Maybe, but it looks like his townposting to me.
In post 439, Aegor wrote:Seriously; is no one reading Skull's posts?
I am reading them. So, what's the issue?
In post 460, Metal Sonic wrote:private and confidential

but this playerlist is good :]
With the exception of me. But that's okay. Every players list needs "that one guy."
In post 464, Angry Frat BROs wrote:^ You can distance all you guys want, Angry P is still going to shoot you in the face tonight.
Oh, you're not a bulletproof this game?
In post 470, zMuffinMan wrote:it is largely a meta-based read. there are differences in how he plays as scum and town, and i am pretty sure this is his scum game. i don't really expect anyone to be convinced by me saying this, but you can compare and contrast how he talks in games he's town yourself (
if you're any good at reading tone and attitude, and i don't think you are based on your current reads, so maybe it's a long shot you'll actually be able to do this
)
I don't know how to do this, which is why I don't bother meta-diving (also, I just don't like to invest the time/energy into it).
In post 477, ActionDan wrote:In case there was any confusion I'm playing this game by myself. At least for a while
?

Posted: Fri Jan 31, 2014 3:48 pm
by sangres
VOTE: Flandre

Posted: Fri Jan 31, 2014 3:52 pm
by sangres
In post 810, Kazekirimaru wrote:
In post 744, sangres wrote:goddamnit.

Ok. moving you to leaning town.

but I think you're wrong about pieguyn.
Mind telling me about pie for a sec? I'm not very good at reading him, and I don't see how the supposed RQ makes him town.
I'm waffling about pieguy's sincerity, mostly because of how fast he changed his mind. But, that's putting me in his shoes, which doesn't really work.

But, by nature of his claim he will be sorted sooner by nightkill or later by town suspicion so I'm not going to worry about him right now.

Posted: Fri Jan 31, 2014 4:03 pm
by Brian Skies
In post 491, Cabd wrote:
In post 488, Angry Frat BROs wrote:
In post 484, Cabd wrote:This is not a natural progression of reads.
In post 482, macmollie wrote:mastin how the hell did you townread us off one freakin' post holy shit? that's a cause for concern.
Image
Well between Mac, Myself, and You, we have a 2/3rds majority so your veto can go eat shit.
Not if I join AP in his veto.

Posted: Fri Jan 31, 2014 4:08 pm
by ActionDan
In post 836, sangres wrote:
VOTE: Flandre
no please why

Posted: Fri Jan 31, 2014 4:09 pm
by ActionDan
RUBEDO

Posted: Fri Jan 31, 2014 4:09 pm
by ActionDan
SING TO ME SET ME FREEE

Posted: Fri Jan 31, 2014 4:16 pm
by Kazekirimaru
In post 837, sangres wrote: I'm waffling about pieguy's sincerity, mostly because of how fast he changed his mind. But, that's putting me in his shoes, which doesn't really work.

But, by nature of his claim he will be sorted sooner by nightkill or later by town suspicion so I'm not going to worry about him right now.
But what if it doesn't get sorted out?

My problem is: I still think pie is scum. And I don't think he'd claim Bodyguard as scum unless he could play it off later in the game and explain his survival. But I'm not sure what play that would be, if that makes sense.

I just can't let it go and I'm afraid to just "let it sort itself out".

Posted: Fri Jan 31, 2014 4:23 pm
by sangres
In post 839, ActionDan wrote:
In post 836, sangres wrote:
VOTE: Flandre
no please why
Are you townreading him?

Posted: Fri Jan 31, 2014 4:33 pm
by sangres
In post 842, Kazekirimaru wrote:
In post 837, sangres wrote: I'm waffling about pieguy's sincerity, mostly because of how fast he changed his mind. But, that's putting me in his shoes, which doesn't really work.

But, by nature of his claim he will be sorted sooner by nightkill or later by town suspicion so I'm not going to worry about him right now.
But what if it doesn't get sorted out?

My problem is: I still think pie is scum. And I don't think he'd claim Bodyguard as scum unless he could play it off later in the game and explain his survival. But I'm not sure what play that would be, if that makes sense.

I just can't let it go and I'm afraid to just "let it sort itself out".
I feel pretty sure that in this player list it will get sorted out pretty soon.

I had him around null prior to his post that freaked me out a little. I felt like the level of aggression to the people suspecting him looked a little over the top. But on the other hand it was all of the form: "you know my game, you know how I play, you can't possibly be scumreading me here if you're town" which tends to come from town more than from scum all things equal (which they never are). Then the post he made about zmuffin working to inflluence/taint my read kinda blew me away because of how heavy the implicit assumption that I'm town is. And it bothered me because I can't really fathom why he thinks zmuffin would have that kind of influence on my reads of other players in the first place. But, underneath all that, it was an incredibly paranoid thing to say.
All of that gets refined down, and I still have a null read, now with a ton of footnotes the first of which reads "wtf is with the ott?"

Posted: Fri Jan 31, 2014 5:58 pm
by Brian Skies
In post 714, Kazekirimaru wrote:Why do you always think ragequits are town?
He does? I should add it to my scum-game. Although, personally, I prefer to just PM the mod when I decide to replace out.

Posted: Fri Jan 31, 2014 6:02 pm
by borkjerfkin
Prodding Kagami.

Posted: Fri Jan 31, 2014 6:04 pm
by zMuffinMan
kagami lurks as scum

called it first

Posted: Fri Jan 31, 2014 6:11 pm
by Cabd
In post 847, zMuffinMan wrote:kagami lurks as scum

called it first
Ya think so? Lemme go check something.

Posted: Fri Jan 31, 2014 6:13 pm
by Cabd
Maybe. Town kagami was pretty active in the games i've played with her or modded for her.