↑I have no creativity wrote:i got an idea for everyone: how about we mass flavor claim
I know your flavor, and baboon's
Posted: Mon Sep 08, 2014 9:09 am
by Nashville Dreams
Why those players also:
@tammy:
She was playing Cinderella
She was riding her first bike
Bouncing on the bed looking for a pillow fight
Runnin' through the sprinkler with a big popsicle grin
Dancin with her dad, lookin up at him
If he gives me a hard time
I can't blame the fellow
I'm the one who's stealing - cinderella
Posted: Mon Sep 08, 2014 9:11 am
by The Fonz
↑Csareo wrote:
It confirms whether you're a liar or not.
Since you told the truth, you weren't.
Scum wouldn't claim their honest flavor, because once the theme is discovered, it is pretty clear who's claim is town and scum.
You're not acting very smart.
In a game where the mod has put this role in, scum are obviously going to be able to claim their own flavour without giving away their alignment.
↑I have no creativity wrote:i got an idea for everyone: how about we mass flavor claim
I know your flavor, and baboon's
STOP TALKING. NOW. JESUS.
Posted: Mon Sep 08, 2014 9:12 am
by Csareo
↑The Fonz wrote:
Terrible idea: it's not going to give away alignment to town, because that's game-breaking, but what it might do is give away power/non-power to scum.
I've played games where town won solely on flavor.
Posted: Mon Sep 08, 2014 9:13 am
by Csareo
Fonz isn't saying his flavor, because he has something to hide. I know it though
Posted: Mon Sep 08, 2014 9:16 am
by The Fonz
Just to be clear here, if csareo is town, he's played this horribly.
In confirming that Shark's rolename is Georgio, there was absolutely no need to also add 'action star.' This is info which might help scum work out his role.
Also, it would have been much better to keep under wraps exactly whose flavour he did or didn't have.
Posted: Mon Sep 08, 2014 9:17 am
by The Fonz
↑Csareo wrote: Fonz isn't saying his flavor, because he has something to hide. I know it though
↑Csareo wrote: Fonz isn't saying his flavor, because he has something to hide. I know it though
You're a moron.
Well, you obviously tipped off your role to me.
I'm 80% certain you are town now.
WHAT PART OF SHUT UP ARE YOU NOT GETTING?
Posted: Mon Sep 08, 2014 9:22 am
by Nashville Dreams
Shush
Posted: Mon Sep 08, 2014 9:23 am
by Csareo
WHAT PART OF SHUT UP ARE YOU NOT GETTING?
The part where you don't confirm your flavor.
A mass soft flavor claim seems like a good idea at this point.
Posted: Mon Sep 08, 2014 9:25 am
by Cutty Shark
Dude just stop. We've confirmed your role is legitimate and it tells us nothing about your alignment.
Have you read any of the game? Reads?
-b
Posted: Mon Sep 08, 2014 10:03 am
by Natirasha
Posted: Mon Sep 08, 2014 10:49 am
by Anatole Kuragin
Now Nelly get the hype on first site like, white on whites
(Big boy) them three quarters them lows they all tight
(Big boy) the only problem they only good for one night
(Big boy) 'cause once you scuff um you fucked up your whole night
~AK
Posted: Mon Sep 08, 2014 11:02 am
by gossamer wings
↑Baboon Pride wrote:Also, I think it was Falcon who brought it up, but I dont particularly care about wether or not 5-off has played mafia before ms, he is new
here
and that means he is new to a whole different level of mafia. I had two years experience prior to coming on here, i have made it known, and I always had a confident scum-game but it doesnt change the genuine tone that happened when he assumed everyone else had the same info in their pm that hr had in his, and it closely matches tje genuineness I had when claiming scum in wingate mansion (not sure if you read that game, but you can run it by tammy)
I don't follow. 5-Off's genuineness here matches your genuineness as scum in Wingate so you think 5-Off is town?
~ F-16
Posted: Mon Sep 08, 2014 11:05 am
by gossamer wings
↑Lissa wrote:Second thing - here is what I am thinking.
On 531 - I don't think their certainty is excessively high. It makes sense to me - they are reading me as town, they are thinking 5-Off is telling the truth, that leaves you if there is indeed scum in the neighborhood. I'm not entirely sure if that's included in their reasoning, but my reasoning includes some of that. Stuff like the supposed plagarism thing is not why I scumread you - I think you should have mentioned that Baboon first said what you said (and I thought it was odd that you hadn't seen it), but I don't think it's inherently scummy that you didn't.
On 537 - I don't really think her read on you is that bad. It's a weak case, yes. But I am not sure that's scummy in itself.
On 576 - not really sure what to think of this post. I don't see much of relevance in it that you hadn't said before.
I will see if I can fully explain my Baboon townread tomorrow. (weekends like to make me lazy and it's late now, sorry.) And if I can't explain it, I will reevaluate. Because Four, I'm actually feeling like you're kind of making a decent case right now.
You just refuted or dismissed everything he said as irrelevant, non-alignment revealing, and null. What is this "decent case" in your eyes?
~ F-16
Posted: Mon Sep 08, 2014 11:15 am
by Lissa
Not really sure why Csareo thought it was a good idea to claim now. But alright then.
↑Lissa wrote:Second thing - here is what I am thinking.
On 531 - I don't think their certainty is excessively high. It makes sense to me - they are reading me as town, they are thinking 5-Off is telling the truth, that leaves you if there is indeed scum in the neighborhood. I'm not entirely sure if that's included in their reasoning, but my reasoning includes some of that. Stuff like the supposed plagarism thing is not why I scumread you - I think you should have mentioned that Baboon first said what you said (and I thought it was odd that you hadn't seen it), but I don't think it's inherently scummy that you didn't.
On 537 - I don't really think her read on you is that bad. It's a weak case, yes. But I am not sure that's scummy in itself.
On 576 - not really sure what to think of this post. I don't see much of relevance in it that you hadn't said before.
I will see if I can fully explain my Baboon townread tomorrow. (weekends like to make me lazy and it's late now, sorry.) And if I can't explain it, I will reevaluate. Because Four, I'm actually feeling like you're kind of making a decent case right now.
You just refuted or dismissed everything he said as irrelevant, non-alignment revealing, and null. What is this "decent case" in your eyes?
~ F-16
The "decent case" was not for Baboon being scum, it just made me wonder why I had a townread on them, because right now I can't quite remember. That's why last night after that post I felt I should reevaluate to see why I was reading Baboon as town. I know I had good reasons to think that but for some reason I can't recall what they were at this point and I need to find them and possibly reassess.
Posted: Mon Sep 08, 2014 11:58 am
by Nashville Dreams
Not sure why, but the way csearo is going about that feels town and the fronz reaction feels OTT and forced.
~M
Posted: Mon Sep 08, 2014 12:00 pm
by Nashville Dreams
Also Tammy I think you have figured out who I am and I just want to say I apologize when things got out of hand.
~M
That I'm not a princess, this ain't a fairy tale,
I'm not the one you'll sweep off her feet,
Lead her up the stairwell.
Posted: Mon Sep 08, 2014 12:10 pm
by Nashville Dreams
Now this nation that I love
Has fallen under attack
A mighty sucker punch came flyin’ in
From somewhere in the back
Soon as we could see clearly
Through our big black eye
Man, we lit up your world
Like the 4th of July
ika, we need to get the fuzzy logic out this thread. Csareo has shown plenty of historical differences that make no sense. My other head will not let me vote Tammy and is isnane here. She has let me reach out to you. We should take him to the school of the insane.
VOTE: Csareo
For the rest of you, compare this game to his only game on site.